Hi.
I've set up cygwin's sshd on a couple of boxes and
it's working fine. All boxes are using local password
database to authenticate users. Today I installed
sshd on a 2000 server that is a member server in an
active directory. I followed all the same steps as I
did when I installed and succes
> setup should probably *never* suggest either going backwards or uninstalling.
Never say never? Suppose a showstopper bug is found in a released
package - say one which could result in filestore or configuration
corruption. The quickest solution would be to revert to the
previous version, and
Hi all,
I've been trying to find out about 'lpr' . There doesn't seem to be
any '
--help with the exe or man pages or info pages. I see from the mailing list
that it has only just been added to Cygwin (Cygutil package, I think). I
searched on Author ( Rick Rankin ) , still in the dark.
> -Original Message-
> From: Cliff Hones [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Saturday, April 06, 2002 7:03 PM
> Never say never? Suppose a showstopper bug is found in a
> released package - say one which could result in filestore or
> configuration corruption. The quickest solution
From: "Robert Collins" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: RE: Should setup suggests to downgrade? [WAS: Lillypond for cygwin]
> > From: Cliff Hones [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Saturday, April 06, 2002 7:03 PM
>
> > Never say never? Suppose a showstopper bug is found in a
> > released packa
> -Original Message-
> From: Cliff Hones [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Sunday, April 07, 2002 12:07 AM
Thanks for the feedback.. I'll have a look in the logs tomorrow.
> [I've already mentioned I'm not happy with the current
> download mode - I think it loses a lot of its potent
> From: "Robert Collins" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Saturday, April 06, 2002 3:10 PM
>
> > From: Cliff Hones [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Sunday, April 07, 2002 12:07 AM
>
> Thanks for the feedback.. I'll have a look in the logs tomorrow.
Oops - please ignore the last attachment - I mi
Greetings,
I have encountered a problem in "rm" when used with the "-f" and "-r"
options and a busy and hence unremovable file is encountered.
When "rm -fr" encounters a busy and hence unremovable file, it goes into an
infinite loop consuming as much CPU time as it can get until it is forcibly
> Greetings,
>
> I have encountered a problem in "rm" when used with the "-f" and "-r"
> options and a busy and hence unremovable file is encountered.
>
> When "rm -fr" encounters a busy and hence unremovable file, it goes into
an
> infinite loop consuming as much CPU time as it can get until it i
Chris,
At 09:26 2002-04-06, Chris January wrote:
> > Greetings,
> >
> > I have encountered a problem in "rm" when used with the "-f" and "-r"
> > options and a busy and hence unremovable file is encountered.
> >
> > When "rm -fr" encounters a busy and hence unremovable file, it goes into an
> > i
> > > Greetings,
> > >
> > > I have encountered a problem in "rm" when used with the "-f" and "-r"
> > > options and a busy and hence unremovable file is encountered.
> > >
> > > When "rm -fr" encounters a busy and hence unremovable file, it goes
into an
> > > infinite loop consuming as much CPU t
Chris,
OK. Here's more information. Possibly even interesting information.
I tried this as a test:
% mkdir tstdir
% cd tstdir
% cat >tstdir &
[1]+ Stopped cat >target
% rm target
# No complaint!
% ls -l
ls: target: Permission denied
% rm target
rm: cannot remove `target': Per
> Now I do this:
>
> % mkdir subdir
> % java Writer subdir/target Now is the time
>
>
> In a separate Cygwin window:
>
> % cd tstdir
> % rm -fr subdir
>
>
> And the symptom is manifest: rm sits there, churning away, awaiting its
death at the hands of a merciless signal.
What output do you get wit
> Chris,
>
> OK. Here's more information. Possibly even interesting information.
>
Another question - which shell are you using? Can you reproduce the problem
using bash?
Chris
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Chris,
I'm using BASH.
I'll let you know what the strace experiment turns up when I have some time
to give that a try.
Randall
At 10:25 2002-04-06, you wrote:
> > Chris,
> >
> > OK. Here's more information. Possibly even interesting information.
>
>Another question - which shell are you usin
Hi all,
I'm using the cygwin devel libtool for a helper library for
the kde-cygwin port.
With the libtool-devel-20020202-1 I had a problem with the
cxx configuration, which prohibits linking of shared
libraries.
The message was:
libtool: link: warning: undefined symbols not allowed in
i686-pc-cy
Hi,
I'm in trouble porting a socket base utility from my own between mulptiple
OS.
The goal is to maintain as much as possible the same code, since this
utility
do not use advanced features (I DO NOT WANT TO CODE AN HTTP SERVER !!)
For MS plateform I hope in cygwin environment, but despite the
Chris,
OK. I ran the strace test as you requested.
Here's the invocation of strace I used in place of the unadorned "rm -fr
subdir" invocation from my earlier report:
% strace -d -n -S 1 -w -o rm-fr-strace-out rm -fr subdir
I waited a few seconds then closed the sub-window.
A Bzip2-compress
I've been trying to compile the latest cygwin, but I couldn't. I even tried
using the CVS version, but it didn't work too.
These is the error messages. Any clues ?
Best Regards,
Steve Howe
---
howe@ANGLA ~/cygwin-1.3.10-1/winsup/cygwin
$ make
g++ -c -gstabs+ -O2 -MM
Hi Chris,
Christopher Faylor wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 05, 2002 at 10:01:36PM -0600, Dave Trollope wrote:
> >Since it exists on Linux and Solaris, I figured that this was new to
> >Cygwin and its applications. The question is, for what was it
> >introduced to both Linux and Solaris, and shouldn't
On Sat, Apr 06, 2002 at 04:31:06PM -0600, Dave Trollope wrote:
>Christopher Faylor wrote:
>>On Fri, Apr 05, 2002 at 10:01:36PM -0600, Dave Trollope wrote:
>>>Since it exists on Linux and Solaris, I figured that this was new to
>>>Cygwin and its applications. The question is, for what was it
>>>in
Dave Trollope writes:
>>
>
>I would willingly create a patch myself, but I don't currently understand
>what this error code is for, I was hoping someone would know.
http://www-ccs.ucsd.edu/c/errno.html#EILSEQ
HTH
Norman
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug r
> Chris,
>
> OK. I ran the strace test as you requested.
>
> Here's the invocation of strace I used in place of the unadorned "rm -fr
> subdir" invocation from my earlier report:
>
> % strace -d -n -S 1 -w -o rm-fr-strace-out rm -fr subdir
>
>
> I waited a few seconds then closed the sub-window.
>
Chris,
would you accept a patch to give cygwin gcc FASTCALL support?
Rob
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
> > > On Fri, Apr 05, 2002 at 10:01:36PM -0600, Dave Trollope wrote:
> > > >Since it exists on Linux and Solaris, I figured that this was new to
> > > >Cygwin and its applications. The question is, for what was it
> > > >introduced to both Linux and Solaris, and shouldn't it be introduced
to
> >
On Sun, Apr 07, 2002 at 09:01:18AM +1000, Robert Collins wrote:
>would you accept a patch to give cygwin gcc FASTCALL support?
Um, talk to Danny about this. I think he's already got something along
these lines.
cgf
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reportin
> -Original Message-
> From: Christopher Faylor [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Sunday, April 07, 2002 9:07 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: fastcall for gcc
>
>
> On Sun, Apr 07, 2002 at 09:01:18AM +1000, Robert Collins wrote:
> >would you accept a patch to give cygwin gc
On Sun, Apr 07, 2002 at 09:08:28AM +1000, Robert Collins wrote:
>
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Christopher Faylor [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>> Sent: Sunday, April 07, 2002 9:07 AM
>> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> Subject: Re: fastcall for gcc
>>
>>
>> On Sun, Apr 07, 2002 at 09:01:18AM
> -Original Message-
> From: Christopher Faylor [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Sunday, April 07, 2002 9:12 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: fastcall for gcc
>
>
> On Sun, Apr 07, 2002 at 09:08:28AM +1000, Robert Collins wrote:
> >
> >
> >> -Original Message-
> >>
The current made setup.exe file does not do all i need it to do.
I have spent some time looking @ this list and what the setup.exe does
so far the best help i have found so far is someone post
The final script will be setup so it will add a user/group to 2k/xp
and also make the additions t
Hallo ioda,
Am 2002-04-06 um 20:59 schriebst du:
[..]
> do not use advanced features (I DO NOT WANT TO CODE AN HTTP SERVER !!)
You have coded a HTTP server;)
[...]
> You may get a page saying hello WORLD !
Hello world!
That is all I get if I view the source in Opera connecting from
the
I've installed the latest sshd under 2000 server SP2
and I can't get any userId's to authenticate. sshd is
installed as a service
When I run the service with '-d' instead of '-D' to
enable debugging to the logfile I see the following
error.
"user fztm49 is not allowed because shell /bin/bash is
Just a quick note to say I managed to fix my sshd
problem. The original message is below. The problem
was actually an NTFS file permission issue. The
volume had 'authenticated users' as a file permission.
When I added 'everyone' with 'read/execute' access to
the cygwin directory sshd was able
On Sun, Apr 07, 2002 at 09:12:46AM +1000, Robert Collins wrote:
>Anyway, should I take this as "No, cygwin gcc doesn't need FASTCALL"?
You can take it as a "I'm not really interested in making another 2.95
release".
I would also rather not maintain local tweaks if I can help it.
cgf
--
Unsubsc
Greetings,
If anyone could tell me if the col command is
available for the cygwin environment, I would
appreciate it. I've looked through all of the
packages that would be likely canidates (ie.
cygutils), but have not found it. I also searched the
web and newsgroups via google.com for informati
35 matches
Mail list logo
