On Sun, Apr 07, 2002 at 09:12:46AM +1000, Robert Collins wrote: >Anyway, should I take this as "No, cygwin gcc doesn't need FASTCALL"?
You can take it as a "I'm not really interested in making another 2.95 release". I would also rather not maintain local tweaks if I can help it. cgf -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
