Re: recv(..., MSG_PEEK) (was Re: fetchmail 5.9.8 and maildrop 1.3.7)

2002-03-05 Thread Jason Tishler
Corinna, On Tue, Mar 05, 2002 at 10:14:07AM +0100, Corinna Vinschen wrote: > On Mon, Mar 04, 2002 at 10:56:50AM -0500, Jason Tishler wrote: > > Could you comment as to whether or not the above changes would have any > > positive affects on the following? > > > > http://sources.redhat.com/ml/

Re: recv(..., MSG_PEEK) (was Re: fetchmail 5.9.8 and maildrop 1.3.7)

2002-03-05 Thread Corinna Vinschen
On Mon, Mar 04, 2002 at 10:56:50AM -0500, Jason Tishler wrote: > Corinna, > > On Sun, Mar 03, 2002 at 03:58:18PM +, Rui Carmo wrote: > > On Sat, Mar 02, 2002 at 09:47:19PM -0500, Jason Tishler wrote: > > > > I was under the impression that recv() bugs had been twiddled in > > > > 1.3.10... Or

recv(..., MSG_PEEK) (was Re: fetchmail 5.9.8 and maildrop 1.3.7)

2002-03-04 Thread Jason Tishler
Corinna, On Sun, Mar 03, 2002 at 03:58:18PM +, Rui Carmo wrote: > On Sat, Mar 02, 2002 at 09:47:19PM -0500, Jason Tishler wrote: > > > I was under the impression that recv() bugs had been twiddled in > > > 1.3.10... Or did the changes in recv() not address MSG_PEEK? > > > > Hmm, I will look