On Mon, Mar 04, 2002 at 10:56:50AM -0500, Jason Tishler wrote: > Corinna, > > On Sun, Mar 03, 2002 at 03:58:18PM +0000, Rui Carmo wrote: > > On Sat, Mar 02, 2002 at 09:47:19PM -0500, Jason Tishler wrote: > > > > I was under the impression that recv() bugs had been twiddled in > > > > 1.3.10... Or did the changes in recv() not address MSG_PEEK? > > > > > > Hmm, I will look into this. It would be great if my patch just became > > > obsolete. > > > > The release notes (post by Cristopher: > > http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/2002-02/msg01350.html) mention recv() > > explicitly: > > > > > - Implement socket read/write using recv/send. (corinna) > > > > Bit vague, though, so I don't know if Corinna tackled the MSG_PEEK > > issue. > > Could you comment as to whether or not the above changes would have any > positive affects on the following? > > http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/2001-08/msg00628.html
No. The above change is sort of a code cleanup. I don't know how we could workaround that Winsock problem in Cygwin. It doesn't know from where you got the `n' parameter and it's perfectly legal for a read() call to return a number of bytes < n. Corinna -- Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to Cygwin Developer mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Red Hat, Inc. -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
