Re: mount -X and FAQ [Attn: FAQ Maintainer, tcl maintainer]

2005-09-18 Thread Christopher Faylor
On Sun, Sep 18, 2005 at 03:49:15PM -0700, Yitzchak Scott-Thoennes wrote: >On Sun, Sep 18, 2005 at 02:21:51PM -0400, Christopher Faylor wrote: >> On Sun, Sep 18, 2005 at 10:59:55AM -0700, Yitzchak Scott-Thoennes wrote: >> >On Fri, Sep 16, 2005 at 01:22:10PM -0700, Joshua Daniel Franklin wrote: >> >>

Re: mount -X and FAQ [Attn: FAQ Maintainer, tcl maintainer]

2005-09-18 Thread Yitzchak Scott-Thoennes
On Sun, Sep 18, 2005 at 02:21:51PM -0400, Christopher Faylor wrote: > On Sun, Sep 18, 2005 at 10:59:55AM -0700, Yitzchak Scott-Thoennes wrote: > >On Fri, Sep 16, 2005 at 01:22:10PM -0700, Joshua Daniel Franklin wrote: > >>On 9/16/05, Eric Blake wrote: > >>>According to Williams, Gerald S (Jerry) on

Re: mount -X and FAQ [Attn: FAQ Maintainer, tcl maintainer]

2005-09-18 Thread Christopher Faylor
On Sun, Sep 18, 2005 at 10:59:55AM -0700, Yitzchak Scott-Thoennes wrote: >On Fri, Sep 16, 2005 at 01:22:10PM -0700, Joshua Daniel Franklin wrote: >>On 9/16/05, Eric Blake wrote: >>>According to Williams, Gerald S (Jerry) on 9/15/2005 10:48 AM: The FAQ (http://www.cygwin.com/faq/faq_3.html) ment

Re: mount -X and FAQ [Attn: FAQ Maintainer, tcl maintainer]

2005-09-18 Thread Yitzchak Scott-Thoennes
On Fri, Sep 16, 2005 at 01:22:10PM -0700, Joshua Daniel Franklin wrote: > On 9/16/05, Eric Blake wrote: > > According to Williams, Gerald S (Jerry) on 9/15/2005 10:48 AM: > > > The FAQ (http://www.cygwin.com/faq/faq_3.html) mentions > > > using this idiom for strace and cygcheck, but not for > > >

Re: mount -X and FAQ [Attn: FAQ Maintainer, tcl maintainer]

2005-09-16 Thread Christopher Faylor
On Fri, Sep 16, 2005 at 01:33:18PM -0700, Joshua Daniel Franklin wrote: >On 9/16/05, Christopher Faylor wrote: >> On Fri, Sep 16, 2005 at 01:22:10PM -0700, Joshua Daniel Franklin wrote: >> >On 9/16/05, Eric Blake wrote: >> >> According to Williams, Gerald S (Jerry) on 9/15/2005 10:48 AM: >> >> > Th

Re: mount -X and FAQ [Attn: FAQ Maintainer, tcl maintainer]

2005-09-16 Thread Joshua Daniel Franklin
On 9/16/05, Christopher Faylor wrote: > On Fri, Sep 16, 2005 at 01:22:10PM -0700, Joshua Daniel Franklin wrote: > >On 9/16/05, Eric Blake wrote: > >> According to Williams, Gerald S (Jerry) on 9/15/2005 10:48 AM: > >> > The FAQ (http://www.cygwin.com/faq/faq_3.html) mentions > >> > using this idiom

Re: mount -X and FAQ [Attn: FAQ Maintainer, tcl maintainer]

2005-09-16 Thread Brian Dessent
Brian Dessent wrote: > FAQ -- currently just tclsh84. (and wish84) -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/

Re: mount -X and FAQ [Attn: FAQ Maintainer, tcl maintainer]

2005-09-16 Thread Brian Dessent
Joshua Daniel Franklin wrote: > OK. Maybe I'll take a stab at creating a script to find exe's in /bin/ > not linked to cygwin1.dll and put that in the FAQ instead. In the past I've done this with something like: find /bin -name \*.exe -type f | (while read FN; do cygcheck $FN | \ gre

Re: mount -X and FAQ [Attn: FAQ Maintainer, tcl maintainer]

2005-09-16 Thread Christopher Faylor
On Fri, Sep 16, 2005 at 01:22:10PM -0700, Joshua Daniel Franklin wrote: >On 9/16/05, Eric Blake wrote: >> According to Williams, Gerald S (Jerry) on 9/15/2005 10:48 AM: >> > The FAQ (http://www.cygwin.com/faq/faq_3.html) mentions >> > using this idiom for strace and cygcheck, but not for >> > Tcl/T

Re: mount -X and FAQ [Attn: FAQ Maintainer, tcl maintainer]

2005-09-16 Thread Joshua Daniel Franklin
On 9/16/05, Eric Blake wrote: > According to Williams, Gerald S (Jerry) on 9/15/2005 10:48 AM: > > The FAQ (http://www.cygwin.com/faq/faq_3.html) mentions > > using this idiom for strace and cygcheck, but not for > > Tcl/Tk. Perhaps these should be noted as well? > > Now that strace and cygcheck w

Re: mount -X and FAQ [Attn: FAQ Maintainer, tcl maintainer]

2005-09-16 Thread Christopher Faylor
On Fri, Sep 16, 2005 at 06:23:38AM -0600, Eric Blake wrote: >-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- >Hash: SHA1 > >According to Williams, Gerald S (Jerry) on 9/15/2005 10:48 AM: >> >> Finally got around to trying that one, but it broke the >> tkinfo (Tcl/Tk) script I use regularly. Some experimenting

Re: mount -X and FAQ [Attn: FAQ Maintainer, tcl maintainer]

2005-09-16 Thread Eric Blake
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 According to Williams, Gerald S (Jerry) on 9/15/2005 10:48 AM: > > Finally got around to trying that one, but it broke the > tkinfo (Tcl/Tk) script I use regularly. Some experimenting > revealed that I had to add the following to make it work: > > mo