Richard Foulk wrote:
> We use perl a lot and are looking into building a standard routine for
> the beginning of each script that will add to the path where necessary.
> And perhaps even remove from the path if two or more instances of the
> key libraries are found.
I don't understand how this wo
Running cygwin on a number of diverse machines, accessability of
cygwin1.dll and others can be a problem.
We use perl a lot and are looking into building a standard routine for
the beginning of each script that will add to the path where necessary.
And perhaps even remove from the path if two or m
Billinghurst, David (CRTS) wrote:
>
> You can build gnat on cygwin. See
> - http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2002-06/msg00161.html
> - http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/2002-09/msg01212.html
Wonderful, marvellous !!!
That's the right way to solve the problem !...
Thanks a lot to you David for the
On Wed, Oct 09, 2002 at 01:04:01PM +0200, Jerry van Dijk wrote:
>Christopher Faylor writes:
>>We do have a buy-out license but I don't see how it applies here.
>
>So I get free licenses
You can use the software for free. The GPL says that you just have to
provide your customers with source.
>an
Christopher Faylor writes:
> We do have a buy-out license but I don't see how it applies here.
So I get free licenses and support for my paying customers ? Anyway, this is
not the place to repeat business discussions from the past. I prefer looking
to the future. And my main concern now is g
On Tue, Oct 08, 2002 at 08:06:04PM -0400, Igor Pechtchanski wrote:
>On Tue, 8 Oct 2002, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>> [snip]
>>
>> Anyway, Cygwin is obviously freely available and people are obviously
>> building programs with it using gcc. We are obviously not asking for
>> money from each of...
On Tue, 8 Oct 2002, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> [snip]
>
> Anyway, Cygwin is obviously freely available and people are obviously
> building programs with it using gcc. We are obviously not asking for
> money from each of...
>
> Hey, wait a minute. Nevermind.
>
> Listen up, everyone! You all ow
You can build gnat on cygwin. See
- http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2002-06/msg00161.html
- http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/2002-09/msg01212.html
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation: http://cy
On Tue, Oct 08, 2002 at 09:05:56PM +0200, Jerry van Dijk wrote:
>Christopher Faylor writes:
>>Could I have some clarification on this? Why would the GPL make it
>>impossible to build a cygwin-based release? It seems like gcc is
>>licensed under the GPL and cygwin is licensed under the GPL, so...
On Wed, 2002-10-09 at 05:05, Jerry van Dijk wrote:
>
> Christopher Faylor writes:
>
> > Could I have some clarification on this? Why would the GPL make it
> > impossible to build a cygwin-based release? It seems like gcc is
> > licensed under the GPL and cygwin is licensed under the GPL, so
Christopher Faylor writes:
> Could I have some clarification on this? Why would the GPL make it
> impossible to build a cygwin-based release? It seems like gcc is
> licensed under the GPL and cygwin is licensed under the GPL, so...
No doubt someone will at some point port GNAT to cygwin. T
On Tue, Oct 08, 2002 at 09:16:58AM +0200, Pierre Habraken wrote:
>>Since the Cygwin license makes it impossible for ACT to build a cygwin
>>based public GNAT release, you will need to find X11 libraries that
>>work with mingw and use these for linking with GNAT.
Could I have some clarification on
Thanks Jerry for your advice.
I suspected something like that (though I don't know what is mingw).
I presume that the only thing I can do is to re-build Gnat from source
using ACT binaries and gcc 2.8.1 sources.
Has anyone already done this sort of thing ?
Pierre
Jerry van Dijk wrote:
>
> Pier
13 matches
Mail list logo
