Christopher Faylor writes:
> Could I have some clarification on this? Why would the GPL make it > impossible to build a cygwin-based release? It seems like gcc is > licensed under the GPL and cygwin is licensed under the GPL, so... No doubt someone will at some point port GNAT to cygwin. Two years ago I could not, since it required the payment of a license fee for every user. That may or may not have changed, but it was the situation at the time the decision had to be made. -- -- Jerry van Dijk | email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Leiden, Holland | web: users.ncrvnet.nl/gmvdijk -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
