Christopher Faylor wrote:
> With all due respect, Chuck, when are interactions with you ever
> *minimal*? Nearly every message you send is a slightly longer retelling
> of War and Peace. :-)
Rgt. Wz trng t ly out al issuz to permnently nd subthrd wrt gdb/insight.
So no mor dscssn abt that.
> I
On Sat, Oct 10, 2009 at 07:30:10AM -0400, Charles Wilson wrote:
>Christopher Faylor wrote:
>>I'm sorry. I haven't been giving this my full attention since I have a
>>working version of gdb and insight and thought you were asking insight
>>questions.
>
>'salright.
>
>>I'm wondering if it would just
Christopher Faylor wrote:
> I'm sorry. I haven't been giving this my full attention since I have a
> working version of gdb and insight and thought you were asking insight
> questions.
'salright.
> I'm wondering if it would just be best for me to continue in this vein.
> It probably won't be wor
On Thu, Oct 08, 2009 at 05:25:20PM -0400, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>On Thu, Oct 08, 2009 at 05:23:11PM -0400, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>>I'm wondering if it would just be best for me to continue in this vein.
>
>"this vein" == continue to maintain insight and gdb.
But before I do that I'm gettin
On Thu, Oct 08, 2009 at 05:23:11PM -0400, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>I'm wondering if it would just be best for me to continue in this vein.
"this vein" == continue to maintain insight and gdb.
cgf
--
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com
On Thu, Oct 08, 2009 at 02:53:57PM -0400, Charles Wilson wrote:
>The existing cygwin gdb/insight 6.8-2 package has the following change:
>
>2007-11-30 Pedro Alves <...>
>
> * i386-tdep.c (struct i386_frame_cache): Rename saved_sp to
> prev_frame_sp. Add saved_sp_regnum field.
>
Christopher Faylor wrote:
> Use the insight mailing list, Luke. Keith Seitz is a friend and he does
> not hate Cygwin.
Since it was detailed in "gdb/ChangeLog.Cygwin" I figured it was
appropriate here. But...
http://www.cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-announce/2008-04/msg00011.html
"Unlike most cygwin pac
Charles Wilson wrote:
> (patch vs. "regular" gdb-6.8 attached).
Oops.
diff -urN old/insight-6.8/gdb/i386-tdep.c new/insight-6.8/gdb/i386-tdep.c
--- old/insight-6.8/gdb/i386-tdep.c 2008-03-04 14:49:39.0 -0500
+++ new/insight-6.8/gdb/i386-tdep.c 2008-03-22 18:24:36.0 -0400
@@ -296,6
On Thu, Oct 08, 2009 at 02:53:57PM -0400, Charles Wilson wrote:
>The existing cygwin gdb/insight 6.8-2 package has the following change:
>
>2007-11-30 Pedro Alves <...>
>
> * i386-tdep.c (struct i386_frame_cache): Rename saved_sp to
> prev_frame_sp. Add saved_sp_regnum field.
>
The existing cygwin gdb/insight 6.8-2 package has the following change:
2007-11-30 Pedro Alves <...>
* i386-tdep.c (struct i386_frame_cache): Rename saved_sp to
prev_frame_sp. Add saved_sp_regnum field.
(i386_alloc_frame_cache): Update.
(i386_analyze_stack_align
On Wed, Oct 07, 2009 at 05:46:56PM -0400, Charles Wilson wrote:
>Chris --
>
>Since gdb-7.0 was just released, I figure you'll probably be doing a
>cygwin package fairly soon. However, I know you long to drop insight --
>at least to separate it out from gdb proper.
>
>So, I've got a proposal for you
Chris --
Since gdb-7.0 was just released, I figure you'll probably be doing a
cygwin package fairly soon. However, I know you long to drop insight --
at least to separate it out from gdb proper.
So, I've got a proposal for you:
I'll do an insight-only build (sans gdb.exe, gdb-tui.exe) which inst
12 matches
Mail list logo
