On Sat, Oct 10, 2009 at 07:30:10AM -0400, Charles Wilson wrote: >Christopher Faylor wrote: >>I'm sorry. I haven't been giving this my full attention since I have a >>working version of gdb and insight and thought you were asking insight >>questions. > >'salright. > >>I'm wondering if it would just be best for me to continue in this vein. >>It probably won't be worthwhile to be splitting responsibilities >>because, frankly, I REALLY don't want to be debugging your end of >>things along with my own. This probably sounds mean but I don't mean >>it to be. I just don't want to have to devote double the amount of >>brain power to figuring out my own gdb issues along with yours and then >>coordinating with you every time I find a problem. > >Fair enough. I was anticipating only minimal interaction, after this >initial hurdle -- basically, I'd've grabbed whatever patches you were >using for gdb-7.0 and otherwise stayed out of your hair.
With all due respect, Chuck, when are interactions with you ever *minimal*? Nearly every message you send is a slightly longer retelling of War and Peace. :-) I appreciate that you are trying to help but I do have the technical acumen to deal with these issues myself. However, if I decide to give up gdb maintainership, you'll be first on my list of people to contact. cgf -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
