Re: g++ 3.4.1

Brian Ford wrote: On Sun, 21 Nov 2004, Gerrit P. Haase wrote: Gerrit P. Haase wrote: gcc-3.4 has DWARF2 debug informations enabled, But not by default, correct? That is fine with me. You need to request it with -gdwarf-2 or -ggdb, with just -g you get the same as before, dbx (stabs). Gerrit -- =^.

Re: g++ 3.4.1

On Sun, 21 Nov 2004, Gerrit P. Haase wrote: > Gerrit P. Haase wrote: > > > No, it will be enabled, or better sjlj will not be enabled and the build > > defaults to dwarf2. > > I was wrong with this statement. > > To clarify this: > > gcc-3.4 has DWARF2 debug informations enabled, But not by defau

Re: g++ 3.4.1 (gold stars)

On Sat, 20 Nov 2004, Christopher Faylor wrote: > I believe that the current version of binutils at least supports dwarf-2 True, but it doesn't fully support gcc 3.4.x due to the .rdata alignment issue: http://www.cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2004-09/msg01263.html > Whatever we can do to make dwarf-2 th

Re: g++ 3.4.1 (gold stars)

On Sat, 20 Nov 2004, Christopher Faylor wrote: > [snip] > Oh, and I forgot, can we get two gold stars for Brian Ford for > spearheading the dwarf-2 effort for cygwin? I've been meaning to > suggest this for a long time. Done. Igor -- http://cs.nyu.edu/~pe

Re: g++ 3.4.1

Gerrit P. Haase schrieb: Gerrit P. Haase wrote: No, it will be enabled, or better sjlj will not be enabled and the build defaults to dwarf2. I was wrong with this statement. To clarify this: gcc-3.4 has DWARF2 debug informations enabled, but exception handling will stay to be SjLj exceptions and n

Re: g++ 3.4.1

Gerrit P. Haase wrote: No, it will be enabled, or better sjlj will not be enabled and the build defaults to dwarf2. I was wrong with this statement. To clarify this: gcc-3.4 has DWARF2 debug informations enabled, but exception handling will stay to be SjLj exceptions and not be DWARF2, because: -

Re: g++ 3.4.1

Reini Urban wrote: Gerrit P. Haase schrieb: I'm currently preparing an gcc update to gcc-3.4.2, if this is usable I will make this the default. So you may expect it to be released before Christmas 2004. with dwarf2? I don't know yet. Probably many packages need to be rebuild with this change? At

Re: g++ 3.4.1

Gerrit P. Haase schrieb: Reini Urban wrote: Gerrit P. Haase schrieb: Sam Steingold wrote: when will 3.4 become the default version? I'm currently preparing an gcc update to gcc-3.4.2, if this is usable I will make this the default. So you may expect it to be released before Christmas 2004. with dw

Re: g++ 3.4.1 (gold stars)

On Sat, Nov 20, 2004 at 02:03:44PM +0100, Gerrit P. Haase wrote: >Reini Urban wrote: >>Gerrit P. Haase schrieb: >>>Sam Steingold wrote: when will 3.4 become the default version? >>> >>>I'm currently preparing an gcc update to gcc-3.4.2, if this is usable I >>>will make this the default. So yo

Re: g++ 3.4.1

Reini Urban wrote: Gerrit P. Haase schrieb: Sam Steingold wrote: when will 3.4 become the default version? I'm currently preparing an gcc update to gcc-3.4.2, if this is usable I will make this the default. So you may expect it to be released before Christmas 2004. with dwarf2? I don't know yet.

Re: g++ 3.4.1

Gerrit P. Haase schrieb: Sam Steingold wrote: when will 3.4 become the default version? I'm currently preparing an gcc update to gcc-3.4.2, if this is usable I will make this the default. So you may expect it to be released before Christmas 2004. with dwarf2? -- Crime does not pay ... as well as p

Re: g++ 3.4.1

Sam Steingold wrote: when will 3.4 become the default version? I'm currently preparing an gcc update to gcc-3.4.2, if this is usable I will make this the default. So you may expect it to be released before Christmas 2004. Gerrit -- =^..^= -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe

Re: g++ 3.4.1

> * Reini Urban <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-11-17 17:19:33 +0100]: > > Sam Steingold schrieb: >>>* Igor Pechtchanski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-11-17 10:23:49 -0500]: when will 3.4 become the default version? >>>Sorry, can't answer that. >> who can? > > gerrit (the maintainer) can. Gerrit, could

Re: g++ 3.4.1

Sam Steingold schrieb: * Igor Pechtchanski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-11-17 10:23:49 -0500]: Secondly, gcc-3.4.1 is an experimental package, so you should select the "Exp" radio button on the "Select Packages" screen to get it. WFM. when will 3.4 become the default version? Sorry, can't answer that

Re: g++ 3.4.1

> * Christopher Faylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-11-17 10:24:21 -0500]: > > On Wed, Nov 17, 2004 at 09:58:47AM -0500, Sam Steingold wrote: >>when I use setup to upgrade, I still get gcc 3.3.3. >>when I try clicking "New" to get 3.4.1, "gcc-core" keeps jumping to >>"Keep". >> >>when will 3.4 become

Re: g++ 3.4.1

> * Igor Pechtchanski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-11-17 10:23:49 -0500]: > > On Wed, 17 Nov 2004, Sam Steingold wrote: > >> when I use setup to upgrade, I still get gcc 3.3.3. >> when I try clicking "New" to get 3.4.1, "gcc-core" keeps jumping to >> "Keep". > > Umm, first off, where did you find "New

Re: g++ 3.4.1

On Wed, 17 Nov 2004, Sam Steingold wrote: > when I use setup to upgrade, I still get gcc 3.3.3. > when I try clicking "New" to get 3.4.1, "gcc-core" keeps jumping to > "Keep". Umm, first off, where did you find "New" in setup? Secondly, gcc-3.4.1 is an experimental package, so you should select

Re: g++ 3.4.1

On Wed, Nov 17, 2004 at 09:58:47AM -0500, Sam Steingold wrote: >when I use setup to upgrade, I still get gcc 3.3.3. >when I try clicking "New" to get 3.4.1, "gcc-core" keeps jumping to >"Keep". > >when will 3.4 become the default version? Sometime within the next year. -- Unsubscribe info: h

Re: g++ 3.4.1

when I use setup to upgrade, I still get gcc 3.3.3. when I try clicking "New" to get 3.4.1, "gcc-core" keeps jumping to "Keep". when will 3.4 become the default version? -- Sam Steingold (http://www.podval.org/~sds) running w2k

Re: g++ 3.4.1

At 10:17 AM 11/16/2004, Mikael Åsberg wrote: "Martin Magnusson" wrote: I just tried upgrading from g++ 3.3.1 (which currently gives me an "internal compiler error" on my code) to the 3.4.1 version available from the Cygwin setup. After doing so, however, I get a flood of error messages about the m

Re: g++ 3.4.1

"Martin Magnusson" wrote: I just tried upgrading from g++ 3.3.1 (which currently gives me an "internal compiler error" on my code) to the 3.4.1 version available from the Cygwin setup. After doing so, however, I get a flood of error messages about the many templates I have (such as "template-id xx

g++ 3.4.1

I just tried upgrading from g++ 3.3.1 (which currently gives me an "internal compiler error" on my code) to the 3.4.1 version available from the Cygwin setup. After doing so, however, I get a flood of error messages about the many templates I have (such as "template-id xxx for yyy does not matc

g++-3.4.1 / CVS small cygwin cross compiler problems

Due to libtool/gcc related problems I tried building a cross compiler linux->cygwin. The C compiler works fine, but the c++ compiler has linux->three small problems * libstdc++-v3/crossconfig.m4 is missing an entry for cygwin * libstdc++-v3/configure.ac defines GCC_NO_EXECUTABLES, which