Re: ftello loosing upper 32 bits via _lseek64

On Tue, 18 Nov 2003, Corinna Vinschen wrote: > On Tue, Nov 18, 2003 at 08:59:57AM -0600, Brian Ford wrote: > > I know this doesn't belong on cygwin-patches anymore, but is > > cygwin-developers, or just plain cygwin more appropriate? > > This is a newlib problem with a newlib patch. I don't see a

Re: ftello loosing upper 32 bits via _lseek64

On Tue, Nov 18, 2003 at 08:59:57AM -0600, Brian Ford wrote: > I know this doesn't belong on cygwin-patches anymore, but is > cygwin-developers, or just plain cygwin more appropriate? This is a newlib problem with a newlib patch. I don't see a reason to bother a Cygwin list with it. Corinna --

ftello loosing upper 32 bits via _lseek64

I know this doesn't belong on cygwin-patches anymore, but is cygwin-developers, or just plain cygwin more appropriate? On Mon, 17 Nov 2003, J. Johnston wrote: > Brian Ford wrote: > > On Mon, 17 Nov 2003, Brian Ford wrote: > >>On Mon, 17 Nov 2003, Corinna Vinschen wrote: > >>>On Mon, Nov 17, 2003