On Tue, Nov 18, 2003 at 08:59:57AM -0600, Brian Ford wrote: > I know this doesn't belong on cygwin-patches anymore, but is > cygwin-developers, or just plain cygwin more appropriate?
This is a newlib problem with a newlib patch. I don't see a reason to bother a Cygwin list with it. Corinna -- Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to Cygwin Developer mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Red Hat, Inc. -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/