#x27;cygwin@cygwin.com'
> Subject: Re: echo "$(echo '\r')" oddity
>
> Jan Just Keijser wrote:
>
> > in interactive mode the command seems to work fine. What happens if
> > you build socat and then run the test script (./test.sh) ?
> Which te
Jan Just Keijser wrote:
> in interactive mode the command seems to work fine. What happens if you
> build socat and then run the test script (./test.sh) ? Which tests does it
> fail on?
test.sh fails on the openssl test for me too. I can't really follow
exactly what the testcase is doing though.
Hi Brian,
in interactive mode the command seems to work fine. What happens if you
build socat and then run the test script (./test.sh) ? Which tests does it
fail on?
What DOES fail for me is
$ socat -t 0.1 exec:'openssl s_server -accept 12002 -quiet -cert cacert.pem
-key privkey.pem' pipe &
$ ec
Jan Just Keijser wrote:
> socat (http://www.dest-unreach.org/socat/) is a multi-purpose relay tool
> that can be used to connect sockets to pipes and vice versa, or terminal
> pty's to TCP sockets etc etc. I have found it a very handy tool to build
> VPN-like things in a environment where you cann
jser
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Brian Dessent
> Sent: Tuesday, May 03, 2005 17:54
> To: 'cygwin@cygwin.com'
> Subject: Re: echo "$(echo '\r')" oddity
>
> Jan Just Keijser wrote:
&
Jan Just Keijser wrote:
> thx for the quick answer. Lemme guess: I am going to have to build my own
> version of bash that does not have this behaviour... what is going to break
> if I undo this patch from the bash source code?
>
> It's a shame though, coz this seems to be the only issue that sto
Original Message
>From: Jan Just Keijser
>Sent: 03 May 2005 16:33
> It's a shame though, coz this seems to be the only issue that stops that
> nifty socat from working... all tests pass except those tests that use ``
> or $() ...
Well, if it's only failing a couple of tests, and those
from working... all tests pass except those tests that use `` or
$() ...
Thx,
JJ
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf
> Of Brian Dessent
> Sent: Tuesday, May 03, 2005 17:31
> To: 'cygwin@cygwin.com'
> Subject: Re: ec
Jan Just Keijser wrote:
> I have just run into a Cygwin vs Linux oddity that I cannot explain. I've
> managed to trace the problem back to a very simple statement:
> echo "$(echo -e '\r')" | od -x
> on my W2K Cygwin install (Cygwin1.dll 2005/04/01), this produces
> 000 000a
> 001
> O
Hi,
I have just run into a Cygwin vs Linux oddity that I cannot explain. I've
managed to trace the problem back to a very simple statement:
echo "$(echo -e '\r')" | od -x
on my W2K Cygwin install (Cygwin1.dll 2005/04/01), this produces
000 000a
001
On Linux, this command produces:
Hi,
I have just run into a Cygwin vs Linux oddity that I cannot explain. I've
managed to trace the problem back to a very simple statement:
echo "$(echo -e '\r')" | od -x
on my W2K Cygwin install (Cygwin1.dll 2005/04/01), this produces
000 000a
001
On Linux, this command produces:
11 matches
Mail list logo