----Original Message----
>From: Jan Just Keijser
>Sent: 03 May 2005 16:33
> It's a shame though, coz this seems to be the only issue that stops that
> nifty socat from working... all tests pass except those tests that use ``
> or $() ...
Well, if it's only failing a couple of tests, and those failures aren't
any fault in socat but a side-effect of the cygwin shell, then I don't think
this issue actually does stop socat from working - why don't you just go
ahead and use it?
cheers,
DaveK
--
Can't think of a witty .sigline today....
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
