On Thu, Apr 9, 2009 at 3:23 AM, Atom Smasher wrote:
> ah, bash... i remember when that was the best shell...
No-one's claiming anything about "best", but since bash is the
*default* shell on Cygwin, it would have been helpful to mention in
the first place that you're using something else.
> ## cy
On Thu, 9 Apr 2009, Reini Urban wrote:
try this - http://www.smasher.org/zsh/zshrc-v0.147.gz
http://www.smasher.org/zsh/
like i said... i'm a *nix guy, and there are a few cygwin optimizations
in there that make cygwin/zsh feel much more like home.
## cygwin only: commands that auto-complet
Atom Smasher schrieb:
try this - http://www.smasher.org/zsh/zshrc-v0.147.gz
http://www.smasher.org/zsh/
like i said... i'm a *nix guy, and there are a few cygwin optimizations
in there that make cygwin/zsh feel much more like home.
## cygwin only: commands that auto-complete with and without
On Thu, 9 Apr 2009, Thorsten Kampe wrote:
what a mess, especially when i use auto-complete in my shell.
I can't reproduce that with bash
thors...@tkampe[~]$ ca
cabinet.dllcalcalwin32.dll cat.exe
cabview.dllcal.execapisp.dll catsrv.dll
cacls.exe calc.exe
* Atom Smasher (Thu, 9 Apr 2009 14:23:09 +1200 (NZST))
> i'm coming from a *nix background, but i'm finding that cygwin makes
> things suck less on windows.
>
> one of the things that really annoys me are the duplicate *.exe
> commands...
> cat & cat.exe
&
Larry Hall (Cygwin) wrote:
> Dave Korn wrote:
>> Larry Hall (Cygwin) wrote:
>>> Now, to anticipate your next question, '/usr/bin/cat.exe' and
>>> '/bin/cat.exe' are not duplicates either. See the results of typing
>>> 'mount'.
>>
>> That was the exact opposite of what you meant to say, wasn't it
Dave Korn wrote:
Larry Hall (Cygwin) wrote:
Now, to anticipate your next question, '/usr/bin/cat.exe' and
'/bin/cat.exe' are not duplicates either. See the results of typing 'mount'.
That was the exact opposite of what you meant to say, wasn't it? /usr/bin/*
and /bin/* absolutely are dupli
http://www.cygwin.com/cygwin-ug-net/using-specialnames.html#id318321
according to this, it looks like i should be fine deleting all "*.exe"
commands _from_my_command_hash_.
that's consistent with what i'm seeing on my system. if i'm wrong, someone
please let me know
--
...atom
Larry Hall (Cygwin) wrote:
Atom Smasher wrote:
ls -ilh `which cat cat.exe`
that tells me that the two commands are hard-linked; they share the
same inode.
I meant to respond to this as well, just in case it causes anyone some
confusion. The recipe you note above will indicate that the
Larry Hall (Cygwin) wrote:
> Now, to anticipate your next question, '/usr/bin/cat.exe' and
> '/bin/cat.exe' are not duplicates either. See the results of typing 'mount'.
That was the exact opposite of what you meant to say, wasn't it? /usr/bin/*
and /bin/* absolutely are duplicates of each oth
Atom Smasher wrote:
On Wed, 8 Apr 2009, Larry Hall (Cygwin) wrote:
There are no duplicate *.exe commands. All Cygwin executables contain
the exe extension as Windows prefers. Cygwin tries to make things
easier by mapping "cat" to "cat.exe", for example, which is why it m
On Wed, 8 Apr 2009, Larry Hall (Cygwin) wrote:
There are no duplicate *.exe commands. All Cygwin executables contain
the exe extension as Windows prefers. Cygwin tries to make things
easier by mapping "cat" to "cat.exe", for example, which is why it may
look to you li
Atom Smasher wrote:
i'm coming from a *nix background, but i'm finding that cygwin makes
things suck less on windows.
one of the things that really annoys me are the duplicate *.exe commands...
cat & cat.exe
awk & awk.exe
sed & sed.exe
what a mess, espe
i'm coming from a *nix background, but i'm finding that cygwin makes
things suck less on windows.
one of the things that really annoys me are the duplicate *.exe
commands...
cat & cat.exe
awk & awk.exe
sed & sed.exe
what a mess, especially when
14 matches
Mail list logo
