On Wed, Oct 7, 2015 at 12:12 AM, David Stacey wrote:
>
> On 06/10/15 18:51, Ken Brown wrote:
(snip)
>>
>>
>> What about the following scenario: Package P links against library L.
>> Library L is rebuilt to use the new ABI. Isn't it possible that package P
>> will then have to be rebuilt as we
On 06/10/15 17:26, Christian Franke wrote:
cyg Simple wrote:
On 9/30/2015 7:36 PM, David Stacey wrote:
On 30/09/15 23:34, JonY wrote:
On 10/1/2015 00:05, David Stacey wrote:
On 30/09/15 12:15, JonY wrote:
gcc-5.2.0-1 has been uploaded for 32bit and 64bit Cygwin.
This is the first series of
On 06/10/15 18:51, Ken Brown wrote:
On 10/6/2015 12:26 PM, Christian Franke wrote:
cyg Simple wrote:
On 9/30/2015 7:36 PM, David Stacey wrote:
On 30/09/15 23:34, JonY wrote:
On 10/1/2015 00:05, David Stacey wrote:
On 30/09/15 12:15, JonY wrote:
gcc-5.2.0-1 has been uploaded for 32bit and 64
On 10/6/2015 12:26 PM, Christian Franke wrote:
cyg Simple wrote:
On 9/30/2015 7:36 PM, David Stacey wrote:
On 30/09/15 23:34, JonY wrote:
On 10/1/2015 00:05, David Stacey wrote:
On 30/09/15 12:15, JonY wrote:
gcc-5.2.0-1 has been uploaded for 32bit and 64bit Cygwin.
This is the first series
cyg Simple wrote:
On 9/30/2015 7:36 PM, David Stacey wrote:
On 30/09/15 23:34, JonY wrote:
On 10/1/2015 00:05, David Stacey wrote:
On 30/09/15 12:15, JonY wrote:
gcc-5.2.0-1 has been uploaded for 32bit and 64bit Cygwin.
This is the first series of the 5.x releases, and should be considered
a
On 10/6/2015 6:38 AM, JonY wrote:
Yes, I am aware that something weird is going on in the x86 binutils but
can't seem to pin it down anywhere. gcc builds hang when using the new
nm (or perhaps build very very slowly).
I'd be interested on your findings.
OK, I've started a new thread for this,
On 10/6/2015 02:54, Ken Brown wrote:
> On 9/30/2015 7:15 AM, JonY wrote:
>>
>> gcc-5.2.0-1 has been uploaded for 32bit and 64bit Cygwin.
>>
>> This is the first series of the 5.x releases, and should be considered
>> as experimental as such.
>
> Just a HEADSUP for package maintainers who might wan
On 9/30/2015 7:15 AM, JonY wrote:
gcc-5.2.0-1 has been uploaded for 32bit and 64bit Cygwin.
This is the first series of the 5.x releases, and should be considered
as experimental as such.
Just a HEADSUP for package maintainers who might want to try this: I
installed this by clicking the Exp
On 9/30/2015 7:36 PM, David Stacey wrote:
> On 30/09/15 23:34, JonY wrote:
>> On 10/1/2015 00:05, David Stacey wrote:
>>> On 30/09/15 12:15, JonY wrote:
gcc-5.2.0-1 has been uploaded for 32bit and 64bit Cygwin.
This is the first series of the 5.x releases, and should be considered
>>
On 30/09/15 23:34, JonY wrote:
On 10/1/2015 00:05, David Stacey wrote:
On 30/09/15 12:15, JonY wrote:
gcc-5.2.0-1 has been uploaded for 32bit and 64bit Cygwin.
This is the first series of the 5.x releases, and should be considered
as experimental as such.
Have you managed to work around the
On 10/1/2015 00:05, David Stacey wrote:
> On 30/09/15 12:15, JonY wrote:
>> gcc-5.2.0-1 has been uploaded for 32bit and 64bit Cygwin.
>>
>> This is the first series of the 5.x releases, and should be considered
>> as experimental as such.
>
> Excellent - looking forward to trying this.
>
> Have y
On 30/09/15 12:15, JonY wrote:
gcc-5.2.0-1 has been uploaded for 32bit and 64bit Cygwin.
This is the first series of the 5.x releases, and should be considered
as experimental as such.
Excellent - looking forward to trying this.
Have you managed to work around the ABI change in gcc-5 [1], or
gcc-5.2.0-1 has been uploaded for 32bit and 64bit Cygwin.
This is the first series of the 5.x releases, and should be considered
as experimental as such.
*** CYGWIN-ANNOUNCE UNSUBSCRIBE INFO ***
If you want to unsubscribe from the cygwin-announce mailing list, look
at the "List-Un
13 matches
Mail list logo
