On Sat, May 31, 2014 at 02:29:30AM -0700, PolarStorm wrote:
>Hello,
>[snip]
Ok, there is no new information here. I'm declaring this off-topic for
the cygwin list and asking people to send any follow-ups to the
cygwin-talk.
--
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:
that and your developer egos.
Open your arms to new talent and fresh spirits. Let them prove that
they can do what they claim and let go.
I envy Mr.Penny for supporting this kind of verbal non-sense abuse and
in this case, he's right on all accounts. If it would have been me, I'd
simpl
Steven Penny wrote:
On Thu, May 29, 2014 at 7:04 PM, Chris J. Breisch wrote:
Do you?
https://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2014-05/msg00284.html
From the same thread. Amazing that you missed that.
You are out of your element, mate
https://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2014-05/msg00298.html
I think you sho
On Thu, May 29, 2014 at 05:49:53PM -0500, Steven Penny wrote:
>On Thu, May 29, 2014 at 08:12:46PM -0500, Steven Penny wrote:
>>On Thu, May 29, 2014 at 7:04 PM, Chris J. Breisch wrote:
>>>On Thu, May 29, 2014 at 12:11 PM, Christopher Faylor wrote:
So the bottom line is that git's status is: mis
On Thu, May 29, 2014 at 7:04 PM, Chris J. Breisch wrote:
> Do you?
>
> https://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2014-05/msg00284.html
>
> From the same thread. Amazing that you missed that.
You are out of your element, mate
https://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2014-05/msg00298.html
--
Problem reports: http://
Steven Penny wrote:
On Thu, May 29, 2014 at 12:11 PM, Christopher Faylor wrote:
So the bottom line is that git's status is: missing a maintainer, hoping
for someone to pick it up.
You have short term memory?
http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2014-05/msg00255.html
http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2014-05
On Thu, May 29, 2014 at 12:11 PM, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> So the bottom line is that git's status is: missing a maintainer, hoping
> for someone to pick it up.
You have short term memory?
http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2014-05/msg00255.html
http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2014-05/msg00279.html
--
P
On Thu, May 29, 2014 at 12:56:41PM -0400, David Conrad wrote:
>On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 11:04 AM, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>> On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 09:59:03AM -0500, Steven Penny wrote:
>>> . . .
>>
>> Funny how you're saying "We" as if you are actually contributing
>> anything other than critici
On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 11:04 AM, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 09:59:03AM -0500, Steven Penny wrote:
>> . . .
>
> Funny how you're saying "We" as if you are actually contributing
> anything other than criticism.
>
I started a thread, at one point, to ask about a newer versio
On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 06:26:01PM -0500, Steven Penny wrote:
>On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 5:51 PM, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>> I've taken the ball back. We don't need a new maintainer.
>
>You clearly do, as I have shown. You are just choosing not to take one
>on. That is your right of course. Let
On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 5:51 PM, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> I've taken the ball back. We don't need a new maintainer.
You clearly do, as I have shown. You are just choosing not to take one on. That
is your right of course. Let us continue the status quo.
--
Problem reports: http://cygwin.
On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 03:29:40PM -0400, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 01:00:24PM -0500, Steven Penny wrote:
>>On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 10:04 AM, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>>>Funny how you're saying "We" as if you are actually contributing
>>>anything other than criticism.
>>
>
On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 1:36 PM, Chris J. Breisch wrote:
> Of course, if you haven't yet successfully built the version of the package
> you want to maintain, haven't applied the necessary Cygwin patches, and
> haven't gotten it to successfully work on your machine, then it's a bit
> ludicrous to e
Eric Blake wrote:
On 05/11/2014 10:42 AM, Steven Penny wrote:
Can we get an update? I can create a build if needed.
I haven't relinquished maintainership of this package yet. It's still
on my list of things to build, when I get a moment (although free time
has been a bit sparse as of late with
On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 01:00:24PM -0500, Steven Penny wrote:
>On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 10:04 AM, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>>Funny how you're saying "We" as if you are actually contributing
>>anything other than criticism.
>
>You want me to contribute? Give me maintenance over one of the
>aforemen
On 05/13/2014 12:47 PM, Larry Hall (Cygwin) wrote:
>> Of course, if you haven't yet successfully built the version of the
>> package
>> you want to maintain, haven't applied the necessary Cygwin patches, and
>> haven't gotten it to successfully work on your machine, then it's a bit
>> ludicrous to
On 05/13/2014 02:36 PM, Chris J. Breisch wrote:
Steven Penny wrote:
On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 10:04 AM, Christopher Faylor wrote:
Funny how you're saying "We" as if you are actually contributing
anything other than criticism.
You want me to contribute? Give me maintenance over one of the aforem
Steven Penny wrote:
On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 10:04 AM, Christopher Faylor wrote:
Funny how you're saying "We" as if you are actually contributing
anything other than criticism.
You want me to contribute? Give me maintenance over one of the aforementioned
packages. Ball is in your court.
If you
On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 10:04 AM, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> Funny how you're saying "We" as if you are actually contributing
> anything other than criticism.
You want me to contribute? Give me maintenance over one of the aforementioned
packages. Ball is in your court.
--
Problem reports:
On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 09:59:03AM -0500, Steven Penny wrote:
>On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 7:46 AM, Peter Rosin wrote:
>>I'd rather have a maintainer that insulates me from \r-issues and says
>>"no" before they hit me, than have a maintainer that don't understand
>>why stripping every \r in sight isn't
On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 7:46 AM, Peter Rosin wrote:
> I'd rather have a maintainer
> that insulates me from \r-issues and says "no" before they hit me, than have a
> maintainer that don't understand why stripping every \r in sight isn't such a
> good idea.
We already have a system in place for thi
Steven Penny wrote:
These are major packages, not just "user X favorite package". Several people
including myself have offered to update them, only to be met with "Sorry, I am
maintainer not you. I will do it when I get time". It gets old after a while.
Well, if you don't want to wait, and you
On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 07:29:10AM -0500, Steven Penny wrote:
>These are major packages, not just "user X favorite package". Several people
>including myself have offered to update them, only to be met with "Sorry, I am
>maintainer not you. I will do it when I get time". It gets old after a while.
On 2014-05-13 14:29, Steven Penny wrote:
> On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 12:56 AM, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>> Frankly, please give MSYS2 another try. We'd all appreciate it.
>
> Look at the facts:
>
> coreutils
> newer version released 2 years ago
>
> bash
> newer version released 3 years ago
>
>
On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 12:56 AM, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> Frankly, please give MSYS2 another try. We'd all appreciate it.
Look at the facts:
coreutils
newer version released 2 years ago
bash
newer version released 3 years ago
git
newer version released 2 years ago
These are major packages
On Mon, May 12, 2014 at 04:33:06PM -0500, Steven Penny wrote:
>On Mon, May 12, 2014 at 9:52 AM, Eric Blake wrote:
>> I haven't relinquished maintainership of this package yet. It's still
>> on my list of things to build, when I get a moment (although free time
>> has been a bit sparse as of late w
On Mon, May 12, 2014 at 9:52 AM, Eric Blake wrote:
> I haven't relinquished maintainership of this package yet. It's still
> on my list of things to build, when I get a moment (although free time
> has been a bit sparse as of late with the birth of my daughter last month).
Frankly I dont see how
On 05/11/2014 01:10 PM, Thomas Wolff wrote:
>
> Am 11.05.2014 18:42, schrieb Steven Penny:
>> current Cygwin version is 8.15
>> http://cygwin.com/packages/x86_64/coreutils
>>
>> 8.16 was released over 2 years ago
>> http://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/coreutils
>>
>> MSYS2 is already using 8.22
>> http://githu
On 05/11/2014 10:42 AM, Steven Penny wrote:
> current Cygwin version is 8.15
> http://cygwin.com/packages/x86_64/coreutils
>
> 8.16 was released over 2 years ago
> http://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/coreutils
>
> MSYS2 is already using 8.22
> http://github.com/Alexpux/MSYS2-packages/blob/master/coreutils/PKG
29 matches
Mail list logo
