A lot of the weirdness in configure and make is due to the weird
non-autoconf configure script used at the top level. I'm working on
autoconfiscating it, though it takes a while. This probably accounts for
the missubstitution in the Makefile, and some of the false negatives.
--Nathanael Nerode
On Sun, Sep 22, 2002 at 07:08:21PM -0700, Tim Prince wrote:
>> SEEMS STRANGE to have one and not the other. DOES IT MATTER?
>Since vfork is not a standard C function, no one says there need be such a
>header. There are bigger isssues with vfork on Windows, see the list archive.
I'm not aware o
On Sunday 22 September 2002 17:20, you wrote:
> IN THE VERY FIRST COMPILER TEST, I get these:
>
> ignoring nonexistent directory "../../include/w32api"
> ^^^
> GNU CPP version 3.2 20020912 (prerelease) (cpplib) (80386, BSD syntax)
> GNU C version 3.2 20020912 (prerelease) (i686
The first surprise was that everything (configure, make-bootstrap,
make-check) worked! That's a surprise because it was consistantly
failing only a few days ago and I didn't notice anything changing except
the phase of the moon.
The following observations may not be bugs (except the first).
4 matches
Mail list logo
