On Sun, Sep 22, 2002 at 07:08:21PM -0700, Tim Prince wrote: >> SEEMS STRANGE to have one and not the other. DOES IT MATTER? >Since vfork is not a standard C function, no one says there need be such a >header. There are bigger isssues with vfork on Windows, see the list archive.
I'm not aware of any issues with vfork on Windows. vfork should be much faster than fork. cgf -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
