On Sun, Jul 04, 2010 at 10:07:50AM -0500, Ren? Berber wrote:
> Alex Leigh wrote:
>
> [snip]
> > I get the following error: "ReBaseImage
> > (/usr/bin/cygcrypt-0.dll) failed with last error = 6". Searching
> > around it seems error code 6 comes from the DLL being in use.
>
> Is that error code a W
On Sun, Jul 4, 2010 at 11:15 PM, Larry Hall (Cygwin) wrote:
> On 7/4/2010 3:20 AM, Alex Leigh wrote:
>>
>> On Sun, Jul 4, 2010 at 1:07 AM, Larry Hall (Cygwin) wrote:
>>>
>>> On 7/4/2010 1:01 AM, Alex Leigh wrote:
Hi,
I've been getting some STATUS_ACCESS_VIOLATION errors when run
On Sun, Jul 04, 2010 at 11:15:16PM -0400, Larry Hall (Cygwin) wrote:
>On 7/4/2010 3:20 AM, Alex Leigh wrote:
>> On Sun, Jul 4, 2010 at 1:07 AM, Larry Hall (Cygwin) wrote:
>>> On 7/4/2010 1:01 AM, Alex Leigh wrote:
I've been getting some STATUS_ACCESS_VIOLATION errors when running
bash and
On 7/4/2010 3:20 AM, Alex Leigh wrote:
On Sun, Jul 4, 2010 at 1:07 AM, Larry Hall (Cygwin) wrote:
On 7/4/2010 1:01 AM, Alex Leigh wrote:
Hi,
I've been getting some STATUS_ACCESS_VIOLATION errors when running
bash and some xwin programs, and after some searching I'm trying to
run rebaseall to
Alex Leigh wrote:
[snip]
> I get the following error: "ReBaseImage
> (/usr/bin/cygcrypt-0.dll) failed with last error = 6". Searching
> around it seems error code 6 comes from the DLL being in use.
Is that error code a Windows exit code? Then it means "The handle is
invalid." (i.e. running 'net
2010/7/4 Václav Haisman:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA256
>
> Alex Leigh wrote, On 4.7.2010 9:20:
>> On Sun, Jul 4, 2010 at 1:07 AM, Larry Hall (Cygwin) wrote:
>>> On 7/4/2010 1:01 AM, Alex Leigh wrote:
Hi,
I've been getting some STATUS_ACCESS_VIOLATION errors
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Alex Leigh wrote, On 4.7.2010 9:20:
> On Sun, Jul 4, 2010 at 1:07 AM, Larry Hall (Cygwin) wrote:
>> On 7/4/2010 1:01 AM, Alex Leigh wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I've been getting some STATUS_ACCESS_VIOLATION errors when running
>>> bash and some xwin p
On Sun, Jul 4, 2010 at 1:07 AM, Larry Hall (Cygwin) wrote:
> On 7/4/2010 1:01 AM, Alex Leigh wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I've been getting some STATUS_ACCESS_VIOLATION errors when running
>> bash and some xwin programs, and after some searching I'm trying to
>> run rebaseall to see if that would fix the
On 7/4/2010 1:01 AM, Alex Leigh wrote:
Hi,
I've been getting some STATUS_ACCESS_VIOLATION errors when running
bash and some xwin programs, and after some searching I'm trying to
run rebaseall to see if that would fix the problem. However, when
running rebaseall from ash, I get the following erro
At 02:48 PM 6/26/2004, you wrote:
>On Sat, 26 Jun 2004, Larry Hall wrote:
>> * ;-) Al this is an *attempt* at humor. Please don't take any of it
>> seriously.
>
>'kay. But who's "Al"? ;-)
Al's a good friend of mine. Here, let me introduce you. Al, I'd like you
to meet... Al? Where'd he
On Sat, Jun 26, 2004 at 02:39:20PM -0400, Igor Pechtchanski wrote:
>On Sat, 26 Jun 2004, Eric Hanchrow wrote:
>>[snip]
>>(But I don't regret reinstalling -- for some reason it's much faster
>>now, even though I'm using the same versions of all the DLLs)
>
>FWIW, ne simple explanation of the above i
On Sat, 26 Jun 2004, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 26, 2004 at 02:39:20PM -0400, Igor Pechtchanski wrote:
> >On Sat, 26 Jun 2004, Eric Hanchrow wrote:
> >>[snip]
> >>(But I don't regret reinstalling -- for some reason it's much faster
> >>now, even though I'm using the same versions of a
On Sat, 26 Jun 2004, Larry Hall wrote:
> At 01:45 PM 6/26/2004, you wrote:
> >[snip]
> >(But I don't regret reinstalling -- for some reason it's much faster
> >now, even though I'm using the same versions of all the DLLs)
>
> That's a little known secret of Cygwin. It gets faster every time
> you
At 01:45 PM 6/26/2004, you wrote:
>I've had rebaseall fail with error 6, even when (as far as I knew)
>there were no running processes that had any Cygwin DLL mapped. (I
>also made sure the DLL was writable). Out of frustration I
>completely uninstalled, then reinstalled, all of Cygwin, and that
On Sat, 26 Jun 2004, Eric Hanchrow wrote:
> [snip]
> (But I don't regret reinstalling -- for some reason it's much faster
> now, even though I'm using the same versions of all the DLLs)
FWIW, ne simple explanation of the above is that file fragmentation was
most likely greatly reduced with a comp
I've had rebaseall fail with error 6, even when (as far as I knew)
there were no running processes that had any Cygwin DLL mapped. (I
also made sure the DLL was writable). Out of frustration I
completely uninstalled, then reinstalled, all of Cygwin, and that
fixed the problem :-) I now suspect t
On Sat, 26 Jun 2004, Brian Dessent wrote:
> Mark Jaffe wrote:
> >
> > Yes, I understand the issue. However, one of the processes is
> > supporting ssh which is the ONLY way I have of reaching this machine at
> > all. Stopping the sshd will end my session.
>
> I suppose you could use Windows' AT co
Mark Jaffe wrote:
>
> Yes, I understand the issue. However, one of the processes is
> supporting ssh which is the ONLY way I have of reaching this machine at
> all. Stopping the sshd will end my session.
I suppose you could use Windows' AT command to schedule the rebase to
run 5 minutes from the
Mark Jaffe wrote:
> Yes, I understand the issue. However, one of the processes is
> supporting ssh which is the ONLY way I have of reaching this machine at
> all. Stopping the sshd will end my session.
>
Run it from the machine you used to install XP and Cygwin then.
--
Unsubscribe info:
Yes, I understand the issue. However, one of the processes is
supporting ssh which is the ONLY way I have of reaching this machine at
all. Stopping the sshd will end my session.
On Jun 25, 2004, at 9:41 PM, Larry Hall wrote:
At 11:48 PM 6/25/2004, you wrote:
I am working with a new installation
At 11:48 PM 6/25/2004, you wrote:
>I am working with a new installation on XP (wiped and reinstalled after infection.)
>When I try to run our build script I got this:
>
>C:\cygwin\bin\python2.3.exe (4000): *** unable to remap
>C:\cygwin\bin\cygssl-0.9.7.dll to same address as parent(0x74) !=
I am working with a new installation on XP (wiped and reinstalled after infection.) When I try to run our build script I got this:
C:\cygwin\bin\python2.3.exe (4000): *** unable to remap C:\cygwin\bin\cygssl-0.9.7.dll to same address as parent(0x74) != 0x75 4 [main] python 2620 sync_w
22 matches
Mail list logo
