Shaddy Baddah writes:
> Otherwise, Debian has a whole package just for that script... is it
> untrendy to follow suit?
It's either that, or pull in 10Mb of tetex just for a script. If you
want to package texi2html, please mail to cygwin-apps. If not, I
intend to include it in the next tetex upl
Hi again,
Shaddy Baddah wrote:
> I just found this all out the hard way. I noticed the switch in the
> mknetrel file for 3.0.0-3, and knowing that the executable was included
> in 2.0.x, I wondered about the rationale of its' inclusion.
Oh, I forgot to mention that there seems to be a number of p
Hi,
Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote:
>>Probably, but a successful build of the Cygwin HTML documentation relies
>>on texi2html being present.
>
>
> Ah.
Nice one of me to come into the discussion a week late, but I've been
doing something recently that required texi2html.
Not wanting to gripe or anythi
On 8/4/05, Igor Pechtchanski wrote:
> I like the way the new FAQ looks. One question, however: is DocBook
> easily installable on Cygwin? Can the FAQ be built with the default
> settings of Cygwin's DocBook package? If so, this package should be
> listed as a prerequisite for building the Cygwi
On Thu, 4 Aug 2005, Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote:
> Igor Pechtchanski writes:
>
> > Probably, but a successful build of the Cygwin HTML documentation relies
> > on texi2html being present.
>
> Ah.
>
> > It would have been nice to at least announce that texi2html is no
> > longer packaged, and/or packag
Igor Pechtchanski writes:
> Probably, but a successful build of the Cygwin HTML documentation relies
> on texi2html being present.
Ah.
> It would have been nice to at least announce that texi2html is no
> longer packaged, and/or package it separately. I don't see that in
> your tetex-3.0.0 anno
On Thu, 4 Aug 2005, Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote:
> Igor Pechtchanski writes:
>
> > Incidentally, tetex-3.0.0 seems to be missing the texi2html executable
> > (it was present in tetex-2.0.2). Jan, any comments?
>
> teTeX bundles a whole lot of stuff, like libpng, texinfo, zlib, ncurses,
> whatnot. I
Igor Pechtchanski writes:
> Incidentally, tetex-3.0.0 seems to be missing the texi2html executable (it
> was present in tetex-2.0.2). Jan, any comments?
teTeX bundles a whole lot of stuff, like libpng, texinfo, zlib,
ncurses, whatnot. I think that sane, independent packages like these
had bette
On Wed, 3 Aug 2005, Joshua Daniel Franklin wrote:
> I'm tired of tip-toeing around the texinfo source for the FAQ just to make
> sure links to the numbered questions work
FYI, "makeinfo --html" will have named anchors (with names being section
headers), and so will "texi2html --node-files" (I als
9 matches
Mail list logo
