Igor Pechtchanski writes: > Probably, but a successful build of the Cygwin HTML documentation relies > on texi2html being present.
Ah. > It would have been nice to at least announce that texi2html is no > longer packaged, and/or package it separately. I don't see that in > your tetex-3.0.0 announcements. IMO, that's what announcements are > *for*. It wasn't dropped intentionally, as it wasn't even supposed to be in 2.0.x. >> Fwiw, my last tetex-2.0.2-15 mknetrel script also has >> --without-texi2html. > > This seems to contradict > <http://cygwin.com/cgi-bin2/package-cat.cgi?file=tetex-bin%2Ftetex-bin-2.0.2-15&grep=bin%2Ftexi2html>. Indeed. I'm not sure what that means, maybe the --without-texi2html switch was broken in 2.0.x. > To reiterate -- I don't want this e-mail to come off as a demand for > something. It didn't. I'll try building with --with-texi2html, and see if that works. If it's not too much trouble, texi2html will be in the next release. Jan. -- Jan Nieuwenhuizen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | GNU LilyPond - The music typesetter http://www.xs4all.nl/~jantien | http://www.lilypond.org -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
