Re: OK to mention if it runs on cygwin

2002-01-13 Thread Robert Collins
=== - Original Message - From: "Tim Prince" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Robert Collins wrote: > > > If it's running on cygwin, I wouldn't object to it being discussed here. > > > > Rob > > > > > I'm sure others will object to my seizing upon your opening. No need to worry about others - I can

Re: OK to mention if it runs on cygwin

2002-01-13 Thread Charles Wilson
Christopher Faylor wrote: > On Sun, Jan 13, 2002 at 08:40:22AM -0800, Tim Prince wrote: > >>Robert Collins wrote: >> >>>If it's running on cygwin, I wouldn't object to it being discussed here. >>> >>> >>I'm sure others will object to my seizing upon your opening. I got struct >>running on cygw

Re: OK to mention if it runs on cygwin

2002-01-13 Thread Christopher Faylor
On Sun, Jan 13, 2002 at 08:40:22AM -0800, Tim Prince wrote: >Robert Collins wrote: >>If it's running on cygwin, I wouldn't object to it being discussed here. >> >I'm sure others will object to my seizing upon your opening. I got struct >running on cygwin yesterday, which demonstrates a significa

Re: OK to mention if it runs on cygwin

2002-01-13 Thread Tim Prince
Robert Collins wrote: > If it's running on cygwin, I wouldn't object to it being discussed here. > > Rob > > I'm sure others will object to my seizing upon your opening. I got struct running on cygwin yesterday, which demonstrates a significant improvement in Unix compatibility on cygwin.