On Sun, Jan 13, 2002 at 08:40:22AM -0800, Tim Prince wrote: >Robert Collins wrote: >>If it's running on cygwin, I wouldn't object to it being discussed here. >> >I'm sure others will object to my seizing upon your opening. I got struct >running on cygwin yesterday, which demonstrates a significant improvement in >Unix compatibility on cygwin. I have tried many times before, but this time >it was no different from setting it up for linux. struct is an old Unix >version 6 program which translates dirty old Fortran into a structured >Fortran-compatible form which resembles C (ratfor). Ratfor can in turn be >translated to g77 with indentation, using all the f90 extensions to avoid >goto's. If anyone has suggestions about how to translate my associated lex >pre-processor to flex, I'd be grateful.
And you think that a subject like "OK to mention if it runs on cygwin" will attract hordes of flex/lex hackers to your cause? For the record, generic flex/lex issues *are* off-topic. Surely you can get help in a more appropriate mailing list (or web page or newsgroup). cgf -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
