On Jun 9 14:23, Helmut Karlowski wrote:
> Achim Gratz
> Tue, 9 Jun 2015 11:18:40 + (UTC)
> ---
>
> > Again, I just think procps is good enough for us as is, it is good enough
> > for Linux anyway.
> > :-)
>
> Would be great if the ps from procp
Achim Gratz
Tue, 9 Jun 2015 11:18:40 + (UTC)
---
> Again, I just think procps is good enough for us as is, it is good enough
> for Linux anyway.
> :-)
Would be great if the ps from procps would work as the current ps,
e.g. ps -W (with and witho
Corinna Vinschen cygwin.com> writes:
> That requires to update procps and cygwin packages at the same time.
I thought the raison d'être was that procps, by using the /proc interface,
would not be intertwined with the kernel anymore... I didn't suggest to move
it into another package, btw: the pro
On Jun 9 06:58, Achim Gratz wrote:
> Corinna Vinschen cygwin.com> writes:
>
> > > On another front, I've recently uüstreamed a patch for a Perl distribution
> > > to use /proc/pid/statm because ps from Cygwin doesn't implement a switch
> > > to
> > > show the vmsize information. The maintainer
On Jun 9 08:02, İsmail Dönmez wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 8, 2015 at 11:07 PM, Corinna Vinschen
> wrote:
> > On Jun 8 19:18, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> >> On Jun 8 16:10, Achim Gratz wrote:
> >> > Corinna Vinschen cygwin.com> writes:
> >> > > > One question though, would it be possible to return execu
Corinna Vinschen cygwin.com> writes:
> > On another front, I've recently uüstreamed a patch for a Perl distribution
> > to use /proc/pid/statm because ps from Cygwin doesn't implement a switch to
> > show the vmsize information. The maintainer of said distribution said he
> > was expecting a BSD
On Mon, Jun 8, 2015 at 11:07 PM, Corinna Vinschen
wrote:
> On Jun 8 19:18, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>> On Jun 8 16:10, Achim Gratz wrote:
>> > Corinna Vinschen cygwin.com> writes:
>> > > > One question though, would it be possible to return executable name
>> > > > instead of for non-Cygwin pro
On Jun 8 19:18, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> On Jun 8 16:10, Achim Gratz wrote:
> > Corinna Vinschen cygwin.com> writes:
> > > > One question though, would it be possible to return executable name
> > > > instead of for non-Cygwin processes?
> > >
> > > That should work, it just needs implementin
On Jun 8 16:10, Achim Gratz wrote:
> Corinna Vinschen cygwin.com> writes:
> > > One question though, would it be possible to return executable name
> > > instead of for non-Cygwin processes?
> >
> > That should work, it just needs implementing.
> >
> > However, I'm just mulling over another id
Corinna Vinschen cygwin.com> writes:
> > One question though, would it be possible to return executable name
> > instead of for non-Cygwin processes?
>
> That should work, it just needs implementing.
>
> However, I'm just mulling over another idea. It's probably even
> possible to return the c
On Jun 8 18:25, İsmail Dönmez wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 8, 2015 at 6:12 PM, İsmail Dönmez wrote:
> > On Mon, Jun 8, 2015 at 4:21 PM, Corinna Vinschen
> > wrote:
> >> On Jun 8 14:41, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> >>> On Jun 6 12:58, İsmail Dönmez wrote:
> >>> > Hi,
> >>> >
> >>> > I had a nice discussio
On Mon, Jun 8, 2015 at 6:12 PM, İsmail Dönmez wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 8, 2015 at 4:21 PM, Corinna Vinschen
> wrote:
>> On Jun 8 14:41, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>>> On Jun 6 12:58, İsmail Dönmez wrote:
>>> > Hi,
>>> >
>>> > I had a nice discussion with tmux maintainers over at
>>> > https://github.c
On Mon, Jun 8, 2015 at 4:21 PM, Corinna Vinschen
wrote:
> On Jun 8 14:41, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>> On Jun 6 12:58, İsmail Dönmez wrote:
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > I had a nice discussion with tmux maintainers over at
>> > https://github.com/tmux/tmux/issues/13 about the tmux 2.0 regression
>> > on Cyg
On Jun 8 14:41, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> On Jun 6 12:58, İsmail Dönmez wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I had a nice discussion with tmux maintainers over at
> > https://github.com/tmux/tmux/issues/13 about the tmux 2.0 regression
> > on Cygwin.
> >
> > Long story short, tmux is trying to read /proc//cm
On Jun 6 12:58, İsmail Dönmez wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I had a nice discussion with tmux maintainers over at
> https://github.com/tmux/tmux/issues/13 about the tmux 2.0 regression
> on Cygwin.
>
> Long story short, tmux is trying to read /proc//cmdline and
> /proc//cwd for various reasons and for non-Cy
> set -g automatic-rename off
Should be setw -g ...
Also if there is an api to detect if a process is non-cygwin that
would also help on tmux side.
--
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/doc
16 matches
Mail list logo