Re: More details about the tmux 2.0 regression

2015-06-10 Thread Corinna Vinschen
On Jun 9 14:23, Helmut Karlowski wrote: > Achim Gratz > Tue, 9 Jun 2015 11:18:40 + (UTC) > --- > > > Again, I just think procps is good enough for us as is, it is good enough > > for Linux anyway. > > :-) > > Would be great if the ps from procp

Re: More details about the tmux 2.0 regression

2015-06-09 Thread Helmut Karlowski
Achim Gratz Tue, 9 Jun 2015 11:18:40 + (UTC) --- > Again, I just think procps is good enough for us as is, it is good enough > for Linux anyway. > :-) Would be great if the ps from procps would work as the current ps, e.g. ps -W (with and witho

Re: More details about the tmux 2.0 regression

2015-06-09 Thread Achim Gratz
Corinna Vinschen cygwin.com> writes: > That requires to update procps and cygwin packages at the same time. I thought the raison d'être was that procps, by using the /proc interface, would not be intertwined with the kernel anymore... I didn't suggest to move it into another package, btw: the pro

Re: More details about the tmux 2.0 regression

2015-06-09 Thread Corinna Vinschen
On Jun 9 06:58, Achim Gratz wrote: > Corinna Vinschen cygwin.com> writes: > > > > On another front, I've recently uüstreamed a patch for a Perl distribution > > > to use /proc/pid/statm because ps from Cygwin doesn't implement a switch > > > to > > > show the vmsize information. The maintainer

Re: More details about the tmux 2.0 regression

2015-06-09 Thread Corinna Vinschen
On Jun 9 08:02, İsmail Dönmez wrote: > On Mon, Jun 8, 2015 at 11:07 PM, Corinna Vinschen > wrote: > > On Jun 8 19:18, Corinna Vinschen wrote: > >> On Jun 8 16:10, Achim Gratz wrote: > >> > Corinna Vinschen cygwin.com> writes: > >> > > > One question though, would it be possible to return execu

Re: More details about the tmux 2.0 regression

2015-06-08 Thread Achim Gratz
Corinna Vinschen cygwin.com> writes: > > On another front, I've recently uüstreamed a patch for a Perl distribution > > to use /proc/pid/statm because ps from Cygwin doesn't implement a switch to > > show the vmsize information. The maintainer of said distribution said he > > was expecting a BSD

Re: More details about the tmux 2.0 regression

2015-06-08 Thread İsmail Dönmez
On Mon, Jun 8, 2015 at 11:07 PM, Corinna Vinschen wrote: > On Jun 8 19:18, Corinna Vinschen wrote: >> On Jun 8 16:10, Achim Gratz wrote: >> > Corinna Vinschen cygwin.com> writes: >> > > > One question though, would it be possible to return executable name >> > > > instead of for non-Cygwin pro

Re: More details about the tmux 2.0 regression

2015-06-08 Thread Corinna Vinschen
On Jun 8 19:18, Corinna Vinschen wrote: > On Jun 8 16:10, Achim Gratz wrote: > > Corinna Vinschen cygwin.com> writes: > > > > One question though, would it be possible to return executable name > > > > instead of for non-Cygwin processes? > > > > > > That should work, it just needs implementin

Re: More details about the tmux 2.0 regression

2015-06-08 Thread Corinna Vinschen
On Jun 8 16:10, Achim Gratz wrote: > Corinna Vinschen cygwin.com> writes: > > > One question though, would it be possible to return executable name > > > instead of for non-Cygwin processes? > > > > That should work, it just needs implementing. > > > > However, I'm just mulling over another id

Re: More details about the tmux 2.0 regression

2015-06-08 Thread Achim Gratz
Corinna Vinschen cygwin.com> writes: > > One question though, would it be possible to return executable name > > instead of for non-Cygwin processes? > > That should work, it just needs implementing. > > However, I'm just mulling over another idea. It's probably even > possible to return the c

Re: More details about the tmux 2.0 regression

2015-06-08 Thread Corinna Vinschen
On Jun 8 18:25, İsmail Dönmez wrote: > On Mon, Jun 8, 2015 at 6:12 PM, İsmail Dönmez wrote: > > On Mon, Jun 8, 2015 at 4:21 PM, Corinna Vinschen > > wrote: > >> On Jun 8 14:41, Corinna Vinschen wrote: > >>> On Jun 6 12:58, İsmail Dönmez wrote: > >>> > Hi, > >>> > > >>> > I had a nice discussio

Re: More details about the tmux 2.0 regression

2015-06-08 Thread İsmail Dönmez
On Mon, Jun 8, 2015 at 6:12 PM, İsmail Dönmez wrote: > On Mon, Jun 8, 2015 at 4:21 PM, Corinna Vinschen > wrote: >> On Jun 8 14:41, Corinna Vinschen wrote: >>> On Jun 6 12:58, İsmail Dönmez wrote: >>> > Hi, >>> > >>> > I had a nice discussion with tmux maintainers over at >>> > https://github.c

Re: More details about the tmux 2.0 regression

2015-06-08 Thread İsmail Dönmez
On Mon, Jun 8, 2015 at 4:21 PM, Corinna Vinschen wrote: > On Jun 8 14:41, Corinna Vinschen wrote: >> On Jun 6 12:58, İsmail Dönmez wrote: >> > Hi, >> > >> > I had a nice discussion with tmux maintainers over at >> > https://github.com/tmux/tmux/issues/13 about the tmux 2.0 regression >> > on Cyg

Re: More details about the tmux 2.0 regression

2015-06-08 Thread Corinna Vinschen
On Jun 8 14:41, Corinna Vinschen wrote: > On Jun 6 12:58, İsmail Dönmez wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I had a nice discussion with tmux maintainers over at > > https://github.com/tmux/tmux/issues/13 about the tmux 2.0 regression > > on Cygwin. > > > > Long story short, tmux is trying to read /proc//cm

Re: More details about the tmux 2.0 regression

2015-06-08 Thread Corinna Vinschen
On Jun 6 12:58, İsmail Dönmez wrote: > Hi, > > I had a nice discussion with tmux maintainers over at > https://github.com/tmux/tmux/issues/13 about the tmux 2.0 regression > on Cygwin. > > Long story short, tmux is trying to read /proc//cmdline and > /proc//cwd for various reasons and for non-Cy

Re: More details about the tmux 2.0 regression

2015-06-06 Thread İsmail Dönmez
> set -g automatic-rename off Should be setw -g ... Also if there is an api to detect if a process is non-cygwin that would also help on tmux side. -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/doc