On Jun 8 16:10, Achim Gratz wrote: > Corinna Vinschen <corinna-cygwin <at> cygwin.com> writes: > > > One question though, would it be possible to return executable name > > > instead of <defunct> for non-Cygwin processes? > > > > That should work, it just needs implementing. > > > > However, I'm just mulling over another idea. It's probably even > > possible to return the comand line and cwd, as long as the calling > > process (cat) has permission to open a handle to the requested process. > > I'll toy around with this a bit... > > Does that mean that top would finally be able to show Windows > processes as well?
Looks like it. My patch seems to work nicely, it just needs some polish. > On another front, I've recently uüstreamed a patch for a Perl distribution > to use /proc/pid/statm because ps from Cygwin doesn't implement a switch to > show the vmsize information. The maintainer of said distribution said he > was expecting a BSD ps before anything else and didn't like the Linux /proc > interface a lot, but it seems we might want to move to a more modern ps > implementation (Linux ps uses /proc under the hood, AFAIK) when the > underlying functionality in Cygwin has that covered. Use procps? Corinna -- Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to Cygwin Maintainer cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Red Hat
pgpnkoGhOWIxO.pgp
Description: PGP signature
