> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf
> Of Corinna Vinschen
> Sent: Wednesday, January 02, 2002 11:05 AM
> To: Cygwin
> Subject: Re: duplicate regexec/regcomp functions detected
>
>
> On Wed, Jan 02, 2002 at 12:5
On Wed, Jan 02, 2002 at 12:57:25AM +0100, Ralf Habacker wrote:
> Thanks for this hints. While porting kdelibs I have had to explicity closed and
>delete the
> socket file before I can bound to it (which wasn't used under other ported os) and
>as I found
> the decribed code in the bind() function
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf
> Of Corinna Vinschen
> Sent: Tuesday, January 01, 2002 4:07 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: duplicate regexec/regcomp functions detected
>
>
> On Mon, Dec 31, 200
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf
> Of Christopher Faylor
> Sent: Tuesday, January 01, 2002 5:59 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: duplicate regexec/regcomp functions detected
>
>
> On Tue, Jan 01, 200
On Tue, Jan 01, 2002 at 06:52:07PM +0100, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>On Tue, Jan 01, 2002 at 11:59:21AM -0500, Chris Faylor wrote:
>> On Tue, Jan 01, 2002 at 03:24:49PM +0100, Ralf Habacker wrote:
>> >Then search cygdll.a after those symbols and extract only the relevant
>> >d000xxx.o from cygdll.a
On Tue, Jan 01, 2002 at 11:59:21AM -0500, Chris Faylor wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 01, 2002 at 03:24:49PM +0100, Ralf Habacker wrote:
> >Then search cygdll.a after those symbols and extract only the relevant
> >d000xxx.o from cygdll.a to a newly created import library named
> >libpthread.a or other revel
On Tue, Jan 01, 2002 at 03:24:49PM +0100, Ralf Habacker wrote:
>After thinking about this problem a while I had an idea how to solve
>such problems instead of using simple links from libcygwin.a to
>libpthread.a and other. The idea was to use the cygwin1.dll as used
>currently, but to build only
On Mon, Dec 31, 2001 at 07:53:28PM +0100, Ralf Habacker wrote:
> > >- unix domain socket - The above mentioned os supports creating unix
> > >domain sockets with previous existing files. On cygwin the unix domain
> > >sockets couldn't be bound on existing files, so it has to be removed
> > >first
> From: "Ralf Habacker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >
> > No, only the symbols, which are defined in pthread.o, called the
> "reflib" in speclib.
>
> That will be an incomplete list of symbols then, as I've been removing
> them from pthread.o - there is (a minor) performance hit with the
> redirection,
- Original Message -
From: "Ralf Habacker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> No, only the symbols, which are defined in pthread.o, called the
"reflib" in speclib.
That will be an incomplete list of symbols then, as I've been removing
them from pthread.o - there is (a minor) performance hit with the
- Original Message -
From: "Ralf Habacker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> I'm thinking about, what you are meaning. Could it be, that you don't
recognized the [..] as
> optional part ?
> So the real line could be
> gcc -o test main.o -lpthread
> or
> gcc -o test main.o -lpthread -lcygwin
On Mon, Dec 31, 2001 at 07:59:15PM +0100, Ralf Habacker wrote:
>> Why would you infer that? You ran 'nm' over cygdll.a. Does that mean that all of
>the
>> symbols from cygdll.a were part of libpthread.a?
>>
>No, only the symbols, which are defined in pthread.o, called the "reflib" in speclib.
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf
> Of Christopher Faylor
> Sent: Monday, December 31, 2001 6:18 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: duplicate regexec/regcomp functions detected
>
>
> On Mon, Dec 31, 200
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf
> Of Christopher Faylor
> Sent: Sunday, December 30, 2001 7:45 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: duplicate regexec/regcomp functions detected
>
>
> On Sun, Dec 30, 200
On Mon, Dec 31, 2001 at 10:28:52AM +0100, Ralf Habacker wrote:
>> -Original Message-
>> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf
>> Of Christopher Faylor
>> Sent: Sunday, December 30, 2001 8:37 PM
>> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> Su
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf
> Of Christopher Faylor
> Sent: Sunday, December 30, 2001 8:37 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: duplicate regexec/regcomp functions detected
>
>
> On Sat, Dec 29, 200
On Sun, Dec 30, 2001 at 02:56:43PM -0500, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>On Sun, Dec 30, 2001 at 02:37:23PM -0500, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>>On Sat, Dec 29, 2001 at 08:21:43PM +0100, Ralf Habacker wrote:
>>>Ralf Habacker wrote
The patch for creating libpthread.a is appended. It contains a script
On Sun, Dec 30, 2001 at 02:37:23PM -0500, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>On Sat, Dec 29, 2001 at 08:21:43PM +0100, Ralf Habacker wrote:
>>Ralf Habacker wrote
>>>The patch for creating libpthread.a is appended. It contains a script names
>"speclib" and an
>>additional rule >in the src/winsup/cygwin/Ma
On Sat, Dec 29, 2001 at 08:21:43PM +0100, Ralf Habacker wrote:
>Ralf Habacker wrote
>>The patch for creating libpthread.a is appended. It contains a script names
>"speclib" and an
>additional rule >in the src/winsup/cygwin/Makefile.in.
>
>I have recognized yet a little problem with the speclib sc
On Sun, Dec 30, 2001 at 02:18:56PM +0100, Ralf Habacker wrote:
>>Again, the above link line does not make sense.
>
>It's a faulty example. It should look like this:
>
> gcc -o test main.o -lpthread [-lcygwin]
Ok. I'm officially tired of this discussion now. If we've been
arguing for three m
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf
> Of Christopher Faylor
> Sent: Sunday, December 30, 2001 2:39 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: duplicate regexec/regcomp functions detected
>
>
> On Sat, Dec 29, 200
On Sat, Dec 29, 2001 at 07:58:49PM +0100, Ralf Habacker wrote:
>> I could be wrong, but I think this is the first complaint I've heard
>> about libpthread.a. The same complaint could be levelled at libm.a.
>> The simple fact of life is that library inclusion order does matter.
>> Cygwin is not th
Ralf Habacker wrote
>The patch for creating libpthread.a is appended. It contains a script names "speclib"
>and an
additional rule >in the src/winsup/cygwin/Makefile.in.
I have recognized yet a little problem with the speclib script. I have checked this
from the
cygwin build dir without any err
> The above command line is just bogus. The -lpthread before the main.o
> is wrong. If you are going to choose an example choose one that makes
> sense.
This was a real example, I've found in the qt library and has the intention to show
... ups, this sentence should have an e
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf
> Of Christopher Faylor
> Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 6:50 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: duplicate regexec/regcomp functions detected
>
>
> On Fri, Dec 28, 200
On Fri, Dec 28, 2001 at 12:14:04PM +0100, Ralf Habacker wrote:
>> >gcc -o test -lpthread main.o [-lcygwin]
>> >
>> >This will result in multiple defined symbols for WinMain (expected that
>> >main.o contains a main function). You can say don't do this, but what
>> >about bigger packages like qt.
- Original Message -
From: "Ralf Habacker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > >gcc -o test -lpthread main.o [-lcygwin]
> > >
> > >This will result in multiple defined symbols for WinMain (expected
that
> > >main.o contains a main function). You can say don't do this, but
what
> > >about bigger pack
>
> On Thu, Dec 27, 2001 at 06:22:43PM +0100, Ralf Habacker wrote:
> >> -Original Message-
> >> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf
> >> Of Corinna Vinschen
> >> Sent: Friday, December 14, 2001 11:36 AM
> >> To:
On Thu, Dec 27, 2001 at 06:22:43PM +0100, Ralf Habacker wrote:
>> -Original Message-
>> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf
>> Of Corinna Vinschen
>> Sent: Friday, December 14, 2001 11:36 AM
>> To: cygwin
>> Subject: Re: duplicat
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf
> Of Corinna Vinschen
> Sent: Friday, December 14, 2001 11:36 AM
> To: cygwin
> Subject: Re: duplicate regexec/regcomp functions detected
>
>
> On Thu, Dec 13, 2001 at 09:18:39PM
On Thu, Dec 13, 2001 at 09:18:39PM +0100, Ralf Habacker wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> kde needs the regexp functions regexec and regcomp.
>
> The cygwin lib contains the System V8 function call style, while the pcre package
>(pcreposix)
> provides another style (the system V style I guess). The problem
31 matches
Mail list logo
