On Tue, Jan 01, 2002 at 11:59:21AM -0500, Chris Faylor wrote: > On Tue, Jan 01, 2002 at 03:24:49PM +0100, Ralf Habacker wrote: > >Then search cygdll.a after those symbols and extract only the relevant > >d000xxx.o from cygdll.a to a newly created import library named > >libpthread.a or other revelant name. > > And, here is where I don't understand your confusion. You don't need to > search cygdll.a. You already have a text file available to you which > contains all of the exports from the cygwin DLL -- cygwin.def.
Which results in some missing symbols in libc.a, namely the symbols from $(LIBCOS). The change to have different link libs have let me think that we could drop -lcygwin from the gcc specs file in favour of -lc. But that's impossible w/o $(LIBCOS) linked to libc.a. Did I missunderstood something here? Corinna -- Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to Cygwin Developer mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Red Hat, Inc. -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
