On Feb 10 11:42, Norton Allen via Cygwin wrote:
> On 2/9/2023 4:09 PM, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> > On Feb 9 13:25, Norton Allen via Cygwin wrote:
> > > On 2/8/2023 4:05 PM, Norton Allen via Cygwin wrote:
> > > > [...]
> > > > The problem:
> > > >
> > > > $ chmod g+ws fails to set the 's' bit, and
On 2/9/2023 4:09 PM, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
Hi Norton,
On Feb 9 13:25, Norton Allen via Cygwin wrote:
On 2/8/2023 4:05 PM, Norton Allen via Cygwin wrote:
I briefly raised this issue months ago and am trying to resolve it again
now.
What I am trying to do is setup permissions so multiple us
Hi Norton,
On Feb 9 13:25, Norton Allen via Cygwin wrote:
> On 2/8/2023 4:05 PM, Norton Allen via Cygwin wrote:
> > I briefly raised this issue months ago and am trying to resolve it again
> > now.
> >
> > What I am trying to do is setup permissions so multiple users on one
> > machine can share
On 2/8/2023 4:05 PM, Norton Allen via Cygwin wrote:
I briefly raised this issue months ago and am trying to resolve it
again now.
What I am trying to do is setup permissions so multiple users on one
machine can share full control over a particular directory hierarchy.
On Linux I have usually
On 7/10/2022 10:33 PM, Eliot Moss wrote:
On 7/10/2022 10:17 PM, Chris Wagner wrote:
On 6/29/2022 9:18 AM, Norton Allen wrote:
On one machine I have, chmod g+s fails to set the sticky bit.
The >>> command
does not return any error, but ls -l continues to show the bit
not set.
$ mkdir foo
On 7/10/2022 10:17 PM, Chris Wagner wrote:
On 6/29/2022 9:18 AM, Norton Allen wrote:
On one machine I have, chmod g+s fails to set the sticky bit. The >>> command
does not return any error, but ls -l continues to show the bit not set.
$ mkdir foo
$ chgrp flight foo
$ chmod g+ws fo
On 6/29/2022 9:18 AM, Norton Allen wrote:
On one machine I have, chmod g+s fails to set the sticky bit. The
>>> command
does not return any error, but ls -l continues to show the bit not
set.
$ mkdir foo
$ chgrp flight foo
$ chmod g+ws foo
$ ls -ld foo
drwxrwxr-x+ 1 nor
Greetings, Norton Allen!
> On 6/29/2022 9:18 AM, Norton Allen wrote:
>> On 6/29/2022 7:39 AM, Andrey Repin wrote:
>>> Greetings, Norton Allen!
>>>
On one machine I have, chmod g+s fails to set the sticky bit. The >>>
command
does not return any error, but ls -l continues to show th
On 6/29/2022 9:18 AM, Norton Allen wrote:
On 6/29/2022 7:39 AM, Andrey Repin wrote:
Greetings, Norton Allen!
On one machine I have, chmod g+s fails to set the sticky bit. The
command
does not return any error, but ls -l continues to show the bit not set.
$ mkdir foo
$ chgrp flight f
On 6/29/2022 7:39 AM, Andrey Repin wrote:
Greetings, Norton Allen!
On one machine I have, chmod g+s fails to set the sticky bit. The command
does not return any error, but ls -l continues to show the bit not set.
$ mkdir foo
$ chgrp flight foo
$ chmod g+ws foo
$ ls -ld foo
Greetings, Norton Allen!
> On one machine I have, chmod g+s fails to set the sticky bit. The command
> does not return any error, but ls -l continues to show the bit not set.
> $ mkdir foo
> $ chgrp flight foo
> $ chmod g+ws foo
> $ ls -ld foo
> drwxrwxr-x+ 1 nort flight 0 Jun
On 2020-12-24 14:56, Ken Brown via Cygwin wrote:
Could the problem be that the owner and group are the same? You can
do that on unix, but I'm not sure the Windows security model allows
it. For example, what happens when you remove permissions of the
owner kaz while retaining the permissions of
On 12/24/2020 4:13 PM, Kaz Kylheku (Cygwin) via Cygwin wrote:
On 2020-10-10 09:32, Kaz Kylheku (Cygwin) via Cygwin wrote:
Hi all,
Running this Cygwin on a Windows 10 system:
0:DESKTOP-K8055OB:~$ uname -a
CYGWIN_NT-10.0-WOW DESKTOP-K8055OB 3.1.7(0.340/5/3) 2020-08-22 19:03
i686 Cygwi
When
On 2020-10-10 09:32, Kaz Kylheku (Cygwin) via Cygwin wrote:
Hi all,
Running this Cygwin on a Windows 10 system:
0:DESKTOP-K8055OB:~$ uname -a
CYGWIN_NT-10.0-WOW DESKTOP-K8055OB 3.1.7(0.340/5/3) 2020-08-22 19:03
i686 Cygwi
When a file is created, and permissions set as follows:
0:DESKTOP
On 2020-10-10 14:51, Brian Inglis wrote:
D/ACLs on the directory could restore/maintain the permissions:
could we please see the output from ls -l, getfacl, and icacls on the
directory
and file?
Thanks for your responses, Ken and Brian.
See what you can make of this:
0:DESKTOP-K8055OB:~$ ls
On 2020-10-10 13:41, Ken Brown via Cygwin wrote:
> On 10/10/2020 12:32 PM, Kaz Kylheku (Cygwin) via Cygwin wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> Running this Cygwin on a Windows 10 system:
>>
>> 0:DESKTOP-K8055OB:~$ uname -a
>> CYGWIN_NT-10.0-WOW DESKTOP-K8055OB 3.1.7(0.340/5/3) 2020-08-22 19:03 i686
>> Cy
On 10/10/2020 12:32 PM, Kaz Kylheku (Cygwin) via Cygwin wrote:
Hi all,
Running this Cygwin on a Windows 10 system:
0:DESKTOP-K8055OB:~$ uname -a
CYGWIN_NT-10.0-WOW DESKTOP-K8055OB 3.1.7(0.340/5/3) 2020-08-22 19:03 i686
Cygwi
When a file is created, and permissions set as follows:
0:
On Nov 30 09:23, Ben Altman wrote:
> On 11/28/2016 7:00 PM, L. A. Walsh wrote:
> > Ben Altman wrote: When I get a directory listing, it shows for each
> > > file "Unknown+User Unknown+Group" while on the desktop the same files
> > > show my user name that I logged in with and "Domain Users" as the
On 11/28/2016 7:00 PM, L. A. Walsh wrote:
Ben Altman wrote: When I get a directory listing, it shows for each
file "Unknown+User Unknown+Group" while on the desktop the same files
show my user name that I logged in with and "Domain Users" as the
group.
---
Is your laptop a member of the dom
Ben Altman wrote:
When I log in to my account at work I get access to a network location
accessed as a drive dedicated to me. I log in from 2 locations - my
laptop and desktop.
---
Were both setup by your company's IT department, or
if not, who? Are they both running the same version of
On Feb 10 11:59, Rainer Blome wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA256
>
> On 08.02.2016 15:29, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> > On Jan 31 21:24, Rainer Blome wrote:
> >> On 28.01.2016 21:40, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> > On a hunch, do you have old /etc/passwd and /etc/group
>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 08.02.2016 15:29, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> On Jan 31 21:24, Rainer Blome wrote:
>> On 28.01.2016 21:40, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> On a hunch, do you have old /etc/passwd and /etc/group
> files
There is no `/etc/group`, but `/etc/pass
On Jan 31 21:24, Rainer Blome wrote:
> On 28.01.2016 21:40, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> >>> On a hunch, do you have old /etc/passwd and /etc/group files by
> >>> any chance? Does moving them out of /etc (don't delete them for
> >>> now!), exiting from Cygwin and starting a new shell somehow fix
> >>
On 28.01.2016 21:40, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> On Jan 28 19:43, Rainer Blome wrote:
>>> Corinna Vinschen wrote 2016-01-28 18:22:
On Jan 28 17:06, Rainer Blome wrote:
> Corinna Vinschen wrote 2016-01-28 15-44: And then, what about
> this unknwon group with gid 213? What does
>
>>>
On Jan 28 19:43, Rainer Blome wrote:
> > Corinna Vinschen wrote 2016-01-28 18:22:
> > On Jan 28 17:06, Rainer Blome wrote:
> > > > Corinna Vinschen wrote 2016-01-28 15-44:
> > > > On Jan 28 15:24, Rainer Blome wrote:
> > > > the acl should always at least contain ACEs for the
> > > > default POSIX
> Corinna Vinschen wrote 2016-01-28 18:22:
> On Jan 28 17:06, Rainer Blome wrote:
> > > Corinna Vinschen wrote 2016-01-28 15-44:
> > > On Jan 28 15:24, Rainer Blome wrote:
> > > the acl should always at least contain ACEs for the
> > > default POSIX perms, plus a NULL ACE:
> > >
> > > foo NULL SID
On Jan 28 17:06, Rainer Blome wrote:
> > Corinna Vinschen wrote 2016-01-28 15-44:
> > On Jan 28 15:24, Rainer Blome wrote:
> >
> > The "In-Reply-To" is still missing in your mails, so you're invariably
> > breaking threading. T'would be nice if you could make your mailer
> > behave :)
>
> This is
> Corinna Vinschen wrote 2016-01-28 15-44:
> On Jan 28 15:24, Rainer Blome wrote:
>
> The "In-Reply-To" is still missing in your mails, so you're invariably
> breaking threading. T'would be nice if you could make your mailer
> behave :)
This is the first time that I have a mail to reply to,
hope
On Jan 28 15:24, Rainer Blome wrote:
> (Apologies for not using the reply feature, I was not
> subscribed when the last mail was sent. I am now subscribed.)
The "In-Reply-To" is still missing in your mails, so you're invariably
breaking threading. T'would be nice if you could make your mailer
beh
Rainer, please make sure your mailer doesn't break threading. I tweaked
the "In-Reply-To" now to return to the original thread on the mailing
list. Thank you.
On Jan 28 14:44, Rainer Blome wrote:
> Christopher Cobb wrote on Thu, 28 Jan 2016 01:27:16 +0100:
> > Or maybe chmod is broken, like it i
(Apologies for not using the reply feature, I was not
subscribed when the last mail was sent. I am now subscribed.)
> Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> On Jan 28 01:27, Christopher Cobb wrote:
>> Or maybe chmod is broken, like it is on my machine:
>> $ chmod 777 x
>> chmod: changing permissions of âxâ: In
On Feb 25 22:04, Houder wrote:
> > Hi Henri,
> >
> > On Feb 25 20:23, Houder wrote:
> >> Hi Corinna,
> >>
> >> Ref: https://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2015-02/msg00798.html
> >> - [ANNOUNCEMENT] TEST RELEASE: Cygwin 1.7.35-0.4
> >>
> >> Something for your list of things to think about ... and do later ;
> Hi Henri,
>
> On Feb 25 20:23, Houder wrote:
>> Hi Corinna,
>>
>> Ref: https://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2015-02/msg00798.html
>> - [ANNOUNCEMENT] TEST RELEASE: Cygwin 1.7.35-0.4
>>
>> Something for your list of things to think about ... and do later ;-)
>>
>> For a directory, the 'creator owner' sho
Hi Henri,
On Feb 25 20:23, Houder wrote:
> Hi Corinna,
>
> Ref: https://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2015-02/msg00798.html
> - [ANNOUNCEMENT] TEST RELEASE: Cygwin 1.7.35-0.4
>
> Something for your list of things to think about ... and do later ;-)
>
> For a directory, the 'creator owner' should have s
On 12/30/2013 2:23 PM, Nellis, Kenneth wrote:
From: bartels
On 12/30/2013 06:16 AM, Nithin Kurien wrote:
When I type the following sequence of commands:
cd ~; mkdir sample; chmod -R 0700 sample; stat -c "%a %u %g" sample;
rm -rf sample; mkdir sample; chmod -R 0755 sample; stat -c "%a %u %g"
sa
From: bartels
>
> On 12/30/2013 06:16 AM, Nithin Kurien wrote:
> > When I type the following sequence of commands:
> >
> > cd ~; mkdir sample; chmod -R 0700 sample; stat -c "%a %u %g" sample;
> > rm -rf sample; mkdir sample; chmod -R 0755 sample; stat -c "%a %u %g"
> > sample
> >
> > the output is
On 12/30/2013 06:16 AM, Nithin Kurien wrote:
When I type the following sequence of commands:
cd ~; mkdir sample; chmod -R 0700 sample; stat -c "%a %u %g" sample;
rm -rf sample; mkdir sample; chmod -R 0755 sample; stat -c "%a %u %g"
sample
the output is:
770 1001 513
775 1001 513
Why is chmod
Drew Adams writes:
> I have read various info regarding trying to make Cygwin's `chmod'
> work as (I) expected, including the Cygwin FAQ and user guide.
> I am using Windows 7 with an NTFS disk. My user and group are
> defined as they should be AFAIK.
>
> Two questions in this regard:
>
> . is
On 8/7/2013 2:33 PM, Drew Adams wrote:
I have read various info regarding trying to make Cygwin's `chmod'
work as (I) expected, including the Cygwin FAQ and user guide.
I am using Windows 7 with an NTFS disk. My user and group are
defined as they should be AFAIK.
Two questions in this regard:
On Apr 5 05:37, Karl M wrote:
> On Apr 5 14:25, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> > It works still fine for me if I don't use the same Windows group as
> > owner and as group of the file.
>
> Btw., there were no changes at all between 1.7.10 and 1.7.12 which
> would even remotely touch chmod or chown be
On Apr 5 14:25, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> On Apr 5 05:19, Karl M wrote:
> > > > + ls -al /etc/ssh_host_rsa_key
> > > > -rw-rw 1 Administrators root 1675 Apr 4 11:30 /etc/ssh_host_rsa_key
> > > >
> > > > This test was on a fresh (1.7.12) from this morning.
> > >
> > > There's your problem:
On Apr 5 14:25, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> On Apr 5 05:19, Karl M wrote:
> > > > + ls -al /etc/ssh_host_rsa_key
> > > > -rw-rw 1 Administrators root 1675 Apr 4 11:30 /etc/ssh_host_rsa_key
> > > >
> > > > This test was on a fresh (1.7.12) from this morning.
> > >
> > > There's your problem: T
On Apr 5 05:19, Karl M wrote:
> > > + ls -al /etc/ssh_host_rsa_key
> > > -rw-rw 1 Administrators root 1675 Apr 4 11:30 /etc/ssh_host_rsa_key
> > >
> > > This test was on a fresh (1.7.12) from this morning.
> >
> > There's your problem: The Administrators group and the root group
> > are just
> Date: Thu, 5 Apr 2012 11:46:07 +0200
> From: corinna
> To: cygwin
> Subject: Re: chmod problem
>
> On Apr 4 13:16, Karl M wrote:
> >
> >
> > Hi All...
> >
> >
> > On a recent Cygwin install on a new win7-64 machine, I ran into a pro
On Apr 4 13:16, Karl M wrote:
>
>
> Hi All...
>
>
> On a recent Cygwin install on a new win7-64 machine, I ran into a problem.
> The ssh service would not start because the protection on the
> /etc/ssh_host_rsa_key was too weak. (I use only the rsa host key.)
>
> If I chmod the file to 600
Sorry I didn't mean to cause a problem. I just paraphrased the msys welcome
doc. The more accurate text is:
"Welcome to the world of MSYS and MinGW. Minimal SYStem is a minimal POSIX
system used in the Win32 OS to accomplish configuration and making of
packages.
MSYS is a fork of Cygwin and i
On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 09:57:34AM +0100, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>On Feb 16 00:45, Andrew DeFaria wrote:
>> On 02/15/11 19:40, hardya wrote:
>> >MSYS is described as a fork of cygwin that's specially suited to being used
>> >with win32.
>> How would MSYS be any more "specially suited to being used
On Feb 16 00:45, Andrew DeFaria wrote:
> On 02/15/11 19:40, hardya wrote:
> >MSYS is described as a fork of cygwin that's specially suited to being used
> >with win32.
> How would MSYS be any more "specially suited to being used with
> win32" than Cygwin itself, is it already "specially suited to b
On 02/15/11 19:40, hardya wrote:
MSYS is described as a fork of cygwin that's specially suited to being used
with win32.
How would MSYS be any more "specially suited to being used with win32"
than Cygwin itself, is it already "specially suited to being used with
win32"?!?
Marketing people...
That clears it up then thanks. At least as far as my post here is concerned
any way.
MSYS is described as a fork of cygwin that's specially suited to being used
with win32. I guess I hadn't expected this particular problem to be related
to the fork.
Any way, as you rightly say, it is 'not' cyg
On Feb 15 11:27, hardya wrote:
>
> First let me appologise for the bad subject line and lack of explicit
> content. I realise the importance of following forum guidelines and I shall
> try to be clearer, at least within my ability.
>
> As mentioned at the beginning of my post, though perhaps not
On Sep 10 12:57, René Berber wrote:
> On 9/10/2010 11:18 AM, René Berber wrote:
> > On 9/10/2010 4:04 AM, Yohann wrote:
> >
> > [snip]
> >> Is there any way to check the proper permission configuration on windows
> >> XP or
> >> to restore it?
> >
> > Windows doesn't care about permissions, it
On 9/10/2010 11:18 AM, René Berber wrote:
> On 9/10/2010 4:04 AM, Yohann wrote:
>
> [snip]
>> Is there any way to check the proper permission configuration on windows XP
>> or
>> to restore it?
>
> Windows doesn't care about permissions, it uses 777 for everything, and
> that is the default (ev
On 9/10/2010 4:04 AM, Yohann wrote:
[snip]
> Is there any way to check the proper permission configuration on windows XP
> or
> to restore it?
Windows doesn't care about permissions, it uses 777 for everything, and
that is the default (everything has that permission, text, pictures,
music, zip
On 4/1/2010 11:18 AM, Christopher Faylor wrote:
On Thu, Apr 01, 2010 at 08:03:34AM -0700, Andrew DeFaria wrote:
On 04/01/2010 07:21 AM, Christopher Faylor wrote:
How could a specific error message, which tells you how to turn it off,
be construed as a bug?
Maybe a bug as in "this bothers me"
On Thu, Apr 01, 2010 at 08:03:34AM -0700, Andrew DeFaria wrote:
>
>On 04/01/2010 07:21 AM, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>>How could a specific error message, which tells you how to turn it off,
>>be construed as a bug?
>
>Maybe a bug as in "this bothers me".
By those criteria you classify as a bug.
On 04/01/2010 07:21 AM, Christopher Faylor wrote:
On Thu, Apr 01, 2010 at 02:09:29PM +0530, prakash babu wrote:
I am using cygwin 1.7.2-2 and chmod fails for MS-DOS style path with
the following error message.
eg: chmod 755 C:\\FileName
cygwin warning: MS-DOS style path detected: C:\FileName
On Thu, Apr 01, 2010 at 02:09:29PM +0530, prakash babu wrote:
>I am using cygwin 1.7.2-2 and chmod fails for MS-DOS style path with the
>following error message.
>
>eg: chmod 755 C:\\FileName
>
>cygwin warning: MS-DOS style path detected: C:\FileName
>Preferred POSIX equivalent is: /cygdrive/c/Fil
On Apr 1 14:09, prakash babu wrote:
> I am using cygwin 1.7.2-2 and chmod fails for MS-DOS style path with the
> following error message.
>
> eg: chmod 755 C:\\FileName
>
> cygwin warning: MS-DOS style path detected: C:\FileName
> Preferred POSIX equivalent is: /cygdrive/c/FileName
> CYGWIN en
>> I'm seeing an "Permission denied" failure when using chmod on a mapped
>> network drive. The problem doesn't occur on the local drive and if I use a
>> Windows-style backslash in the name, it works?!
>>
>> CYGWIN_NT-5.1 EHOLMBER-XP 1.7.1(0.218/5/3) 2009-12-07 11:48 i686 Cygwin
>>
>> $ echo $C
On 02/26/2010 01:38 PM, Holmberg, Eric wrote:
I'm seeing an "Permission denied" failure when using chmod on a mapped network
drive. The problem doesn't occur on the local drive and if I use a Windows-style
backslash in the name, it works?!
CYGWIN_NT-5.1 EHOLMBER-XP 1.7.1(0.218/5/3) 2009-12-07
http://cygwin.com/acronyms/#TOFU
On Jan 25 11:25, brassrat wrote:
>
> I agree that the having an R/O attribute conflicts with the concept of ACLS;
> however, it is not true that the chmod command does not change this flag.
> For example,
> if you chmod +w a file with the R/O flag 'set' the R/O
I agree that the having an R/O attribute conflicts with the concept of ACLS;
however, it is not true that the chmod command does not change this flag.
For example,
if you chmod +w a file with the R/O flag 'set' the R/O flag is reset.
(maybe this is a side-effect of the ACL-based processing withi
On Jan 25 07:55, brassrat wrote:
>
> The source control package i use at work is sensitive to the 'read-only'
> attribute of Windows files.
> prior to 1.7, the command 'chmod -w DIR/FILE' worked fine.
> now, with 1.7, chmod -w FILE no longer sets the read-only attribute - i
> guess because
> fort
On 01/06/2010 07:54 PM, Linda Armelle Nzumotcha Tchoumkam wrote:
My program is "ab.exe" included in "C:/Program Files/Flow"
I attempt with :
"chmod a+x /cygdrive/c/Program/flow" and "chmod a+x
/cygdrive/c/Program/flow/ab.exe",
Operator error. If "ab.exe" is in "C:/Program Files/Flow" then the
On 01/04/2010 06:03 PM, rmpbklyn wrote:
have you used chmod before or is it your first time?
this is determine what type of answer to post
give a screenshot link to further describe
Let's all give Linda a chance to absorb the responses so
far and follow-up with the list if more direction is ne
have you used chmod before or is it your first time?
this is determine what type of answer to post
give a screenshot link to further describe
Linda Armelle Nzumotcha Tchoumkam wrote:
>
>
>
> I am a new user of cygwin in windows xp.
> I want to run an executable program connected to cygwin.
>
Linda Armelle Nzumotcha Tchoumkam wrote:
>
> I am a new user of cygwin in windows xp.
> I want to run an executable program connected to cygwin.
> I use the command chmod as ( “[ugoa]*<[-+=]<[rwxXst]*|[ugo]>>+” write “chmod
> a+x /C/Program/flow”)
> But I don’t get to the executable program. I re
If it can be of any help, why don't you try to execute some other
programs instead of chmod and see if you get the same error,
for example instead of "chmod a+x /C/Program/flow" something like
"ls -d /C/Program/flow" and see if works.
If it does then we can say something can be wrong with chmod, i
On Jun 9 11:58, Fischer, Tilman wrote:
> Hello all, Hi Corinna,
>
> I get a 'Permission denied' for 'chmod' or 'chgrp' on a file using a
> standard windows user with full access ('ls -l' shows: '-rwx--+ 1 admin
> None'). According to 'getfacl' the user has the rwx-rights on the file and
> the
Thank you.
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/chmod%2C-ownership%2C-etc-tp21649645p21712842.html
Sent from the Cygwin list mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/proble
On Jan 25 01:04, timcygwin wrote:
> Problem is that the existing files in my Windows area have user ownership
> Administrators, group ownership None, e.g.,
> -rwxrwxrwx 1 Administrators None5513 Jul 20 2005
> set_from_reg.awk*
>
> whereas new files created under cygwin have owner t
- Original Message -
From: "Corinna Vinschen"
On Jul 7 17:12, Steven Hartland wrote:
I know its cheaky but I dont suppose you could shed any light on my
other thread regards 2008 support:-
"apache crashing on windows 2008 when listening on localhost"
Sorry, but no. There's other wo
On Jul 7 17:12, Steven Hartland wrote:
> I know its cheaky but I dont suppose you could shed any light on my
> other thread regards 2008 support:-
> "apache crashing on windows 2008 when listening on localhost"
Sorry, but no. There's other work I have to do and I'm also not keen on
debugging a m
On Jul 7 17:47, Dave Korn wrote:
> Steven Hartland wrote on 07 July 2008 17:12:
> > From: "Corinna Vinschen"
> >> The DLL has been build with VC++ due to the lack of a 64 bit capable gcc
> >> for Cygwin. As long as this is the case, rebaseall will have to be
> >> changed to skip cyglsa.dll and cy
Steven Hartland wrote on 07 July 2008 17:12:
> - Original Message -
> From: "Corinna Vinschen"
>>
>>> One thing I did notice is that rebaseall fails with:-
>>> /usr/bin/cyglsa64.dll: fixing bad relocations
>>> FixImage (/usr/bin/cyglsa64.dll) failed with last error = 13
>>>
>>> As a tempo
- Original Message -
From: "Corinna Vinschen"
This seems to work fine, is there anything I should be aware of if we
looked to use this in production environment?
The mount points are now stored in /etc/fstab and /etc/fstab.d/$USER
instead of in the system and user registry. There are a
On Jul 7 15:37, Steven Hartland wrote:
> - Original Message - From: "Steven Hartland"
>>> Other than that, maybe using the (not yet production) Cygwin 1.7 is
>>> an option for you. You can install a 1.7-based distro over your 1.5
>>> distro using another setup.exe: http://cygwin.com/setup
- Original Message -
From: "Steven Hartland"
Other than that, maybe using the (not yet production) Cygwin 1.7 is
an option for you. You can install a 1.7-based distro over your 1.5
distro using another setup.exe: http://cygwin.com/setup-1.7.exe
I'll give this a shot in a bit and let yo
- Original Message -
From: "Corinna Vinschen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
After further looking into this issue I fear I can't do anything against
that in Cygwin 1.5.25 anymore. There is a strange privilege issue when
using impersonation tokens starting with Windows Vista. The root of the
pro
On Jul 7 11:02, Steven Hartland wrote:
> - Original Message - From: "Corinna Vinschen"
>>> I've attached the output from whoami in both cases. A privaledege
>>> missing from the sshd_server user may be? Note: ssh was installed
>>> with a slightly older than latest version of cygwin so if t
- Original Message -
From: "Corinna Vinschen"
I've attached the output from whoami in both cases. A privaledege
missing from the sshd_server user may be? Note: ssh was installed
with a slightly older than latest version of cygwin so if this has
changed to support 2008 recently that could
On Jul 4 23:21, Steven Hartland wrote:
> Sorry seems I missed one critical element here. I thought I was doing
> all the tests under a cygwin prompt but in fact the chown's I was
> doing under an ssh'ed prompt. It works under a cygwin prompt on the
> desktop but fails when I'm ssh'ed in. So this a
- Original Message -
From: "Steven Hartland"
That's weird. Cygwin always enables the backup and restore privileges
if they are available. The whoami printout in your previous mail
shows that the privilege is in the token. But the above code shows
that the AdjustTokenPrivileges() call
- Original Message -
From: "Corinna Vinschen"
That's weird. Cygwin always enables the backup and restore privileges
if they are available. The whoami printout in your previous mail
shows that the privilege is in the token. But the above code shows
that the AdjustTokenPrivileges() call
On Fri, Jul 04, 2008 at 11:42:25AM -0500, Gary R. Van Sickle wrote:
>> From: Christopher Faylor
>>
>> On Thu, Jul 03, 2008 at 11:22:03PM +0100, Steven Hartland wrote:
>> > Hope this gets through the lists broken spam detection, and
>> helps id
>> > the issue.
>>
>> How to Win Friends and Influe
> From: Christopher Faylor
>
> On Thu, Jul 03, 2008 at 11:22:03PM +0100, Steven Hartland wrote:
> > Hope this gets through the lists broken spam detection, and
> helps id
> > the issue.
>
> How to Win Friends and Influence People...
>
> cgf
>
Please take such Cygwin-content-free snarking to
- Original Message -
From: "Christopher Faylor"
Wasn't meant to be derogatory or anything but having to send each mail
several times with slightly different wording, layout, subjects as they
keep bouncing due to being detected as spam is quite annoying.
I see two blocks from you in the
On Fri, Jul 04, 2008 at 09:47:47AM +0100, Steven Hartland wrote:
>cgf wrote:
>>On Thu, Jul 03, 2008 at 11:22:03PM +0100, Steven Hartland wrote:
>>>Hope this gets through the lists broken spam detection, and helps id
>>>the issue.
>>
>>How to Win Friends and Influence People...
>
>Wasn't meant to be
On Jul 3 23:22, Steven Hartland wrote:
> - Original Message - From: "Corinna Vinschen"
>> You could run this under strace and see what Win32 error message
>> you get. It could be helpful.
>
> Below is the full strace of this, but I think the issue lies where
> you suggested looking at:-
>
- Original Message -
From: "Christopher Faylor"
On Thu, Jul 03, 2008 at 11:22:03PM +0100, Steven Hartland wrote:
Hope this gets through the lists broken spam detection, and helps id the
issue.
How to Win Friends and Influence People...
Wasn't meant to be derogatory or anything b
On Jul 3 23:19, Steven Hartland wrote:
> - Original Message - From: "Corinna Vinschen"
>
>> Works fine for me on 2008 so I assume some local setting which
>> disallows this. Did you remove the "Back up privileg and directories"
>> privilege from the admin's account, by any chance?
>
> The
On Thu, Jul 03, 2008 at 11:22:03PM +0100, Steven Hartland wrote:
> Hope this gets through the lists broken spam detection, and helps id the
> issue.
How to Win Friends and Influence People...
cgf
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports: http://cy
- Original Message -
From: "Corinna Vinschen"
[EMAIL PROTECTED]/: grep testuser /etc/group
testuser:S-1-5-32-545:545:
Huh? Why did you do that? This is the entry for the Users group.
It doesn't seem to make sense to rename it for Cygwin.
Purely for compatibility reasons and has work
- Original Message -
From: "Corinna Vinschen"
Works fine for me on 2008 so I assume some local setting which
disallows this. Did you remove the "Back up privileg and directories"
privilege from the admin's account, by any chance?
The info from "whoami /all" indicates that you are c
On Jul 3 13:25, Steven Hartland wrote:
> Running chmod under 2008 simply doesnt seem to work here,
> which is really strange.
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]/: id
> uid=500(root) gid=513(None)
> groups=513(None),544(Administrators),545(testuser)
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]/tmp: touch test
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]/t
Marc Girod gmail.com> writes:
> I have a follow-up question to my protection problem,
> now trying to access pages under my ~/public_html directory.
I hacked now a work-around, but didn't really fix the error.
I created a new directory, and copied the previous contents there.
Then, I actually c
Hi again,
Marc Girod gmail.com> writes:
> This is on a different host than previously,
Just a couple of additions...
I do have admin rights on that box.
> Here is the symptom about which I hope to read an explanation:
> ~> ls -ld . .bashrc
> drwx--+ 8 Administrators Domain Users 0 Feb
Marc Girod wrote:
I now add the updated and uuencoded cygcheck.out:
begin 700 cygcheck.uue
I may have missed something in the recent conversation here or maybe it's
just my email client (Thunderbird) which doesn't automatically handle this
decoding but this is the first time the notion of
Dave Korn artimi.com> writes:
> I always set my basic CYGWIN settings in the windows system properties
> global environment.
Thanks. I did it now.
> If the remote drive supports proper NTFS ACLs, any file cygwin creates on it
> /while/ CYGWIN=smbntsec is in effect will have proper NTFS acce
1 - 100 of 200 matches
Mail list logo
