On Fri, Jul 06, 2007 at 06:31:23AM -0600, Eric Blake wrote:
>Although in GPLv3, there is a new clause in section 2 that does not have a
>[snip]
>
>IANAL, but [snip...]
I'd hoped that this rathole discussion would disappear but apparently
it's hard to resist the lure of the "IANAL but".
The OP has
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dave Korn
> Sent: Thursday, July 05, 2007 11:48 AM
> To: cygwin@cygwin.com
> Subject: RE: Interference between instances on MS-Windows
>
> On 05 July 2007 16:33, Bob McConne
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
According to Dave Korn on 7/5/2007 10:30 AM:
>> Sending a copy of it to one support tech to
>> debug that vendor's library does not constitute distribution, AFAICT.
>
> Utterly comprehensively wrong. Sorry.
>
> The only thing that "does not cons
Dave Korn wrote:
On 05 July 2007 17:17, Bob McConnell wrote:
Sending a copy of it to one support tech to
debug that vendor's library does not constitute distribution, AFAICT.
Utterly comprehensively wrong. Sorry.
Really?
"You may convey covered works to others for the sole purpose of hav
On 05 July 2007 17:17, Bob McConnell wrote:
> All of the timing is based on the serial data being exchanged with the
> host system. Without that interaction, there is nothing left to examine.
Without testing it you have no way of knowing whether that is important or
not. It could be that there
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dave Korn
> Sent: Thursday, July 05, 2007 11:48 AM
> To: cygwin@cygwin.com
> Subject: RE: Interference between instances on MS-Windows
>
> On 05 July 2007 16:33, Bob McConne
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dave Korn
> Sent: Thursday, July 05, 2007 11:47 AM
> To: cygwin@cygwin.com
> Subject: RE: Interference between instances on MS-Windows
>
> On 05 July 2007 16:16, Bob McConn
On 05 July 2007 16:33, Bob McConnell wrote:
> If I read this right, you are saying there are no reported conflicts in
> pthread resources between multiple processes. That is all I wanted to
> know. I don't like to waste time diagnosing known problems and then be
> told much later that there is an
On 05 July 2007 16:16, Bob McConnell wrote:
>> But unless you can http://cygwin.com/acronyms#PPAST, you're
>> just holding up
>> a black box and saying "There's magic stuff in here and it's
>> broke, does
>> anyone know why", to which the only answer is of course "Depends what the
>> magic stuff
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Christopher Faylor
> Sent: Thursday, July 05, 2007 10:59 AM
> To: cygwin@cygwin.com
> Subject: Re: Interference between instances on MS-Windows
>
> On Thu, Jul 05, 2007
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dave Korn
> Sent: Thursday, July 05, 2007 10:54 AM
> To: cygwin@cygwin.com
> Subject: RE: Interference between instances on MS-Windows
>
> On 05 July 2007 15:11, Bob McCo
On Thu, Jul 05, 2007 at 10:10:36AM -0400, Bob McConnell wrote:
>Good morning,
>
>I have a POS emulation program written in C. It uses two threads, two
>condition variables and a mutex. One thread receives from a serial port,
>the other sends. The condition variables and mutex are used to create a
>
On 05 July 2007 15:11, Bob McConnell wrote:
> Good morning,
>
> I have a
complex system with multiple interactions that a rough overview of is
utterly inadequate to attempt to diagnose complicated interlocking or race
problems.
> Is this a known issue?
What, your program having a bug? No
13 matches
Mail list logo
