On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 03:55:50PM +0530, paritosh chandragupta wrote:
>Hi folks ,
>
>I am hitting the following problem while using gmake :-
>
>617 [exiting thread] gmake 9576 cygthread::stub: erroneous thread
>activation , name is NULL .
>
>Now I am indeed using an old cygwin version and can not
On 11/18/2010 2:25 AM, paritosh chandragupta wrote:
Hi folks ,
I am hitting the following problem while using gmake :-
617 [exiting thread] gmake 9576 cygthread::stub: erroneous thread
activation , name is NULL .
Now I am indeed using an old cygwin version and can not update it due to
dependen
On Sun, Feb 13, 2005 at 12:09:21PM -0500, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 14, 2005 at 01:17:03AM +1000, Nick Coghlan wrote:
> >Nick Coghlan wrote:
> >Command lines looked like (with thread and file counts filled in): $
> >python /lib/python2.4/test/test_threadedtempfile.py -t -f
> >
> >
>
Christopher Faylor wrote:
On Mon, Feb 14, 2005 at 01:12:53PM +1000, Nick Coghlan wrote:
I can't say for sure if it's a regression, since I never got 1.5.12 to work
properly at all (and hence didn't back up the bin directory before dropping
the snapshot binaries into it). At the moment, I'm curiou
On Mon, Feb 14, 2005 at 01:12:53PM +1000, Nick Coghlan wrote:
>Christopher Faylor wrote:
>>On Mon, Feb 14, 2005 at 01:17:03AM +1000, Nick Coghlan wrote:
>>>Command lines looked like (with thread and file counts filled in):
>>>$ python /lib/python2.4/test/test_threadedtempfile.py -t -f
>>>
>>>
>>I
Christopher Faylor wrote:
On Mon, Feb 14, 2005 at 01:17:03AM +1000, Nick Coghlan wrote:
Command lines looked like (with thread and file counts filled in):
$ python /lib/python2.4/test/test_threadedtempfile.py -t -f
Is this a regression? Was this also problem with 1.5.12?
Unless there are pipes
On Mon, Feb 14, 2005 at 01:17:03AM +1000, Nick Coghlan wrote:
>Nick Coghlan wrote:
>>Christopher Faylor wrote:
>>Of course, I don't actually know if this is a related problem or not.
>>I'm hoping Chris can check it easily, since it happens with the standard
>>Cygwin Python, not just with the vers
Nick Coghlan wrote:
Christopher Faylor wrote:
Of course, I don't actually know if this is a related problem or not.
I'm hoping Chris can check it easily, since it happens with the standard
Cygwin Python, not just with the version I built from Python's current CVS.
I took the obvious step of runni
Christopher Faylor wrote:
To help preserve my tenuous grasp on sanity, please reply to *this
thread* when reporting problems. Please don't start a new thread. Just
reply here so that mailing list threading is preserved and I can easily
check for all success or error reports. As before, any kind
Christopher Faylor wrote:
I'm not claiming that it is right now. I haven't tried a "make -j" test
yet. I just thought it was time to release another try on the world
again:
http://cygwin.com/snapshots/
To help preserve my tenuous grasp on sanity, please reply to *this
thread* when reporting probl
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On my machine my own test case, and the make -j2 test case, have been
running now for more than an hour, no problem so far.
You seem to be on the right track :)
Thanks for your efforts
On Wed, Feb 09, 2005 at 12:27:34PM -0500, Rolf Campbell wrote:
>Rolf Campbell wrote:
>>This test does fail (in the same way) on non-hyperthreaded machines
>>(Win2000Pro on a PIII). But, this is a regression from 1.5.12 (that
>>test runs fine on the non-HT machine with 1.5.12. There was (maybe
Rolf Campbell wrote:
This test does fail (in the same way) on non-hyperthreaded machines
(Win2000Pro on a PIII). But, this is a regression from 1.5.12 (that
test runs fine on the non-HT machine with 1.5.12. There was (maybe
still is) a problem with running "make -j" without the max task counte
> -Original Message-
> From: cygwin-owner On Behalf Of Corinna Vinschen
> Sent: 08 February 2005 08:48
> On Feb 8 09:31, J?rg Schaible wrote:
> > Brian Gallew wrote on Monday, February 07, 2005 2:18 PM:
> > > Christopher Faylor wrote:
> > >> Fixing that seems to have fixed my hyperthreadi
Christopher Faylor wrote:
On Mon, Feb 07, 2005 at 08:17:52AM +0100, Volker Bandke wrote:
Which system configuration did you use to recreate the problem?
I got enough donations to purchase the following:
Motherboard: ASUS P4P800SE
Memory: 1G
CPU: CPU P4/3.0EGHz 800M 478P/1MB HT RT
HD: Samsung 1
On Feb 8 09:31, J?rg Schaible wrote:
> Brian Gallew wrote on Monday, February 07, 2005 2:18 PM:
> > Christopher Faylor wrote:
> >> Fixing that seems to have fixed my hyperthreading problems. I have
> >> run three invocations of the scripts for four days without a hiccup.
> >> Previously, I had pr
Brian Gallew wrote on Monday, February 07, 2005 2:18 PM:
> Christopher Faylor wrote:
>> Fixing that seems to have fixed my hyperthreading problems. I have
>> run three invocations of the scripts for four days without a hiccup.
>> Previously, I had problems within minutes.
>
> Go, you! Someone s
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Christopher,
thanks for the explanation (I read, and even understood it) Good
job (Explanation and partial fix).
With kind Regards|\
e-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Christopher Faylor
> Sent: Monday, February 07, 2005 2:44 PM
> To: cygwin@cygwin.com
> Subject: Re: hyperthreading fix, try #1
>
> On Mon, Feb 07, 2005 at 08:17:52AM +0100, Volker Bandke wrote:
> >W
Dave Korn wrote:
I thought you meant CGF should be promoted to Sherriff!
Oh no! He's much to mean for being promoted to Sherriff.
Think of the children!
But those gold stars are more then well deserved. Thanks cgf!
Regards
mks
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
P
On Mon, Feb 07, 2005 at 08:17:52AM +0100, Volker Bandke wrote:
>Which system configuration did you use to recreate the problem?
I got enough donations to purchase the following:
Motherboard:ASUS P4P800SE
Memory: 1G
CPU:CPU P4/3.0EGHz 800M 478P/1MB HT RT
HD: Sa
On Mon, 7 Feb 2005, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 07, 2005 at 09:32:09AM -0500, Igor Pechtchanski wrote:
> >On Mon, 7 Feb 2005, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> >>On Feb 7 08:17, Brian Gallew wrote:
> >>>Christopher Faylor wrote:
> Fixing that seems to have fixed my hyperthreading problems.
> -Original Message-
> From: cygwin-owner On Behalf Of CV
> Sent: 07 February 2005 18:54
> CV hotmail.com> writes:
> > Another vote for the silver star !
>
> Oops, I meant the gold star of course !
>
> Cheers CV
>
I thought you meant CGF should be promoted to Sherriff!
cheers
CV hotmail.com> writes:
> Another vote for the silver star !
Oops, I meant the gold star of course !
Cheers CV
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:
Christopher Faylor cygwin.com> writes:
> I'm not naive enough to think that I've solved all of the hyperthreading
> problems but I would like people to try today's snapshot (or any
> snapshot newer than today's) and report on whether it solves the problem
> or not. If it doesn't, please provide
Volker Bandke wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Rolf,
a) Your test case fails on my machine as well, right at the
beginning
b) I seem to remember that there was/is a separate problem with "make
- -j", even on non-hyperthreasd machines. Unfortunately I cannot
search
On Mon, Feb 07, 2005 at 09:32:09AM -0500, Igor Pechtchanski wrote:
>On Mon, 7 Feb 2005, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>>On Feb 7 08:17, Brian Gallew wrote:
>>>Christopher Faylor wrote:
Fixing that seems to have fixed my hyperthreading problems. I have run
three invocations of the scripts for fou
On Mon, 7 Feb 2005, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> On Feb 7 08:17, Brian Gallew wrote:
> > Christopher Faylor wrote:
> > >Fixing that seems to have fixed my hyperthreading problems. I have run
> > >three invocations of the scripts for four days without a hiccup.
> > >Previously, I had problems within
On Feb 7 08:17, Brian Gallew wrote:
> Christopher Faylor wrote:
> >Fixing that seems to have fixed my hyperthreading problems. I have run
> >three invocations of the scripts for four days without a hiccup.
> >Previously, I had problems within minutes.
>
> Go, you! Someone should give you a gold
Christopher Faylor wrote:
Fixing that seems to have fixed my hyperthreading problems. I have run
three invocations of the scripts for four days without a hiccup.
Previously, I had problems within minutes.
Go, you! Someone should give you a gold star for this.
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygw
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Rolf,
a) Your test case fails on my machine as well, right at the
beginning
b) I seem to remember that there was/is a separate problem with "make
- -j", even on non-hyperthreasd machines. Unfortunately I cannot
search the mailing list ri
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
FWIW, the test case I have been using is now running for 12 ours,
and has done several million iterations. From that point of view the
problem seems to be fixed. Now to run the "real" test case -
building Hercules
Which system configuration did
Christopher Faylor wrote:
[...]
Anyway, I took a look at the pipe handling code for the 457th time and
this time I saw a couple of obvious flaws in my logic. The
synchronization was all off.
Fixing that seems to have fixed my hyperthreading problems. I have run
three invocations of the scripts fo
On Sun, Feb 06, 2005 at 07:22:48PM +0100, Volker Bandke wrote:
>I have started my test script about half an hour ago, and it is still
>running. It never managed to do that before. This could be a good
>sign. Now, the snapshot DLL is far larger than the standard dll (I
>would ASSume because of de
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I have started my test script about half an hour ago, and it is still
running. It never managed to do that before. This could be a good
sign. Now, the snapshot DLL is far larger than the standard dll (I
would ASSume because of debug info). Can t
Christopher Faylor wrote:
However, here is one of the times I repeated that I
don't want to do this over the internet:
[...]
Fixing this problem will be difficult. Dealing with
race conditions like this always is difficult.
Indeed, as an embedded software designer I know this
first hand.
I don't
On Tue, Feb 01, 2005 at 11:01:11PM +0100, Joris van der Sande wrote:
>Larry Hall wrote:
>>Chris has already answered that question earlier in the discussion. He
>>needs physical access to the machine to resolve this problem. Remote
>>access isn't enough.
>
>Forgive my ignorance, but I read the ar
On Tue, 1 Feb 2005, Joris van der Sande wrote:
> Larry Hall wrote:
> > Chris has already answered that question earlier in
> > the discussion. He needs physical access to the
> > machine to resolve this problem. Remote access isn't
> > enough.
>
> Forgive my ignorance, but I read the archives ba
Larry Hall wrote:
Chris has already answered that question earlier in
the discussion. He needs physical access to the
machine to resolve this problem. Remote access isn't
enough.
Forgive my ignorance, but I read the archives back to
1 jan 2004 but found no explanation why remote access
doesn't h
At 07:45 PM 1/30/2005, you wrote:
>The hyperthreading problem reproduces perfectly on my Hush ATX 2.8 GHz P4
>(www.hush-pc.com): building my application fails consistent (within 1 minute)
>with hyperthreading enabled.
>
>Since my machine is on-line 24/7, would it help if I gave Christopher (or
>
On Mon, Jan 10, 2005 at 12:20:23PM -0500, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>On Mon, Jan 10, 2005 at 09:53:55AM +0100, Volker Bandke wrote:
>>I really want that "hyperthreading problem" with Cygwin resolved. Does
>>the following suggestion make any sense:
>>
>>(I assume cfg is in the US, if not, make the
On Mon, Jan 10, 2005 at 08:49:20PM +, Adrian Cox wrote:
>On Mon, 2005-01-10 at 12:20 -0500, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>>The last time I tried to duplicate the problem, I ran a test for three
>>days, tying up a machine that I use for other purposes. I'd previously
>>tried other variations as we
On Mon, 2005-01-10 at 12:20 -0500, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> The last time I tried to duplicate the problem, I ran a test for three
> days, tying up a machine that I use for other purposes. I'd previously
> tried other variations as well. The system is an SMP system so there
> should have been
On Mon, Jan 10, 2005 at 09:53:55AM +0100, Volker Bandke wrote:
>I really want that "hyperthreading problem" with Cygwin resolved. Does
>the following suggestion make any sense:
>
>(I assume cfg is in the US, if not, make the necessary changes)
>
>a: Someone (close by to cfg) demonstrates that the
I've been on XP for a while but IIRC I was seeing it with hyperthread on 2000.
> -Original Message-
> From: Stéphane Donzé [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, January 10, 2005 8:41 AM
> To: Mike Marchywka; Volker Bandke; Cygwin
> Subject: RE: Hyperthreading
x27; error.
Regards,
Stephane Donze
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf
> Of Mike Marchywka
> Sent: lundi 10 janvier 2005 12:42
> To: Volker Bandke; Cygwin
> Subject: RE: Hyperthreading Problem - suggestion
>
>
> This
This just caught my attention this morning, don't know if it has been a
continuing discussion of not but let me contribute the following:
> a: Someone (close by to cfg) demonstrates that the
> bug/problem/issue appears on his machine
I have many annoying problems ( erroneous thread activation fr
At 04:08 PM 1/1/2005, you wrote:
>Brian Bruns wrote:
>>
>>
>>I think you really really really need to reevaluate what you say
>>before you hit send.
>>
>>The open source/free software developers that I communicate with/work
>>with wrote the stuff they did because they needed an
>>application/librar
Brian Bruns wrote:
If you guys want cygwin to be used by real people, in real life
production or development environments, you should go a bit further
than "I don't have the problem on my computer, so fix it yourself".
If you don't want to or are not able to pay attention to "real
world" bugs, cygw
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Sitting in Germany makes it difficult for me to physically send you a machine.
What I can do, though, is to virtually hand over the machine to you via the
net. I have an ADSL connection with 3 megabits/sec download and 512
kilobit/sec download
On Tue, Dec 28, 2004 at 05:29:10PM -0800, Brian Dessent wrote:
>Stephane Donze wrote:
>>If you guys want cygwin to be used by real people, in real life
>>production or development environments, you should go a bit further
>>than "I don't have the problem on my computer, so fix it yourself". If
>>y
Stephane Donze wrote:
> If you guys want cygwin to be used by real people, in real life
> production or development environments, you should go a bit further than
> "I don't have the problem on my computer, so fix it yourself". If you
> don't want to or are not able to pay attention to "real world
On Tuesday, December 28, 2004 5:31 PM [EST], Stephane Donze wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Thank you for your reply. You are right, I did not look at the
> code, and I certainly do not pretend to be able to fix this problem.
>
> I am sorry to have to say that, but your message is a very good
> example of the fu
On Tue, Dec 28, 2004 at 11:31:00PM +0100, Stephane Donze wrote:
>I am sorry to have to say that, but your message is a very good example
>of the fundamental difference between a project that is useable and
>reliable, and a project that "almost works" and will never do more that
>that.
>
>[snip]
> If you guys want cygwin to be used by real people, in real life
> production or development environments, you should go a bit
> further than
> "I don't have the problem on my computer, so fix it yourself".
OK. So, if he's unable to reproduce the problem, you want him
to... do what? Make ran
> multiprocessor machines and nobody seems to care about it. You cannot
> just expect people to "wait until you someday have a system
> that shows
> the problem" everytime they encounter a bug.
Actually since Cygwin is a free project this is a reasonable
expectation. If you want this fixed send
Hi,
Thank you for your reply. You are right, I did not look at the code, and
I certainly do not pretend to be able to fix this problem.
I am sorry to have to say that, but your message is a very good example
of the fundamental difference between a project that is useable and
reliable, and a pro
On Fri, Dec 24, 2004 at 09:01:17AM +0100, St?phane Donz? wrote:
>we have encountered random hangs and crashes in cygwin (see output of
>cygcheck attached to this message) on a dual-processor server running
>Windows Server 2003. IMHO, the so-called "hyperthreading problems" reported
>recently on thi
04 05:11 PM
Please respond to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To
Pablo Ruiz Garcia <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
cc
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject
Re: HyperThreading
On Wed, 27 Oct 2004, Pablo Ruiz Garcia wrote:
> - Original Message -
> From: "Brian Ford"
> To: "Pablo Ruiz Garc
On Wed, 27 Oct 2004, Pablo Ruiz Garcia wrote:
> - Original Message -
> From: "Brian Ford"
> To: "Pablo Ruiz Garcia"
> Cc:
I'm sure you don't care, but...
http://cygwin.com/acronyms/index.html#PCYMTNQREAIYR
> Sent: Wednesday, October 2
- Original Message -
From: "Brian Ford" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Pablo Ruiz Garcia" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, October 27, 2004 8:47 PM
Subject: Re: HyperThreading
On Wed, 27 Oct 2004, Pablo Ruiz Garcia wrote:
On Wed, 27 Oct 2004, Pablo Ruiz Garcia wrote:
> Well I found a minor workaround.. set Affinity of proccess to only use
> one CPU (Thread).
Threads and CPUs are not remotely the same things, so I don't know why you
have that in parenthesis.
But, I guess it's nice to know that you found a workarou
ll" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Pablo Ruiz Garcia" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, October 27, 2004 3:38 PM
Subject: RE: HyperThreading
AFAIK there was some kind of problem with hyperthreading on cygwin,
do anyone know if this problems has be
On Wed, 27 Oct 2004, Pablo Ruiz Garcia wrote:
> I'm having some problems with hyperthreading machines and cygwin.
>
> AFAIK there was some kind of problem with hyperthreading on cygwin,
> do anyone know if this problems has been fixed?
It'd be much more helpful if you actually tried to describe t
>AFAIK there was some kind of problem with hyperthreading on cygwin,
>do anyone know if this problems has been fixed?
No. And they won't be fixed until someone sends a system or enough
money to buy a system with to CGF.
http://www.cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2004-09/msg00082.html
http://www.cygwin.com
65 matches
Mail list logo
