David Christensen wrote:
Andrew DeFaria wrote:
[...]
We cannot debug your environment because we don't have your
environment.
I didn't ask for help debugging my environment, TYVM. I was attempting to help
zip184 with a problem I've faced in the past, and it turned into a huge exercise
in ne
Andrew DeFaria wrote:
> ... Additionally, if say run from cron,
Thanks for the reminder -- cron was another issue/ test case that drove me
towards the solution I posted.
> Since you were obviously having difficulties there is still something
> wrong with *your* environment ...
> and as such I kn
On 31 August 2007 13:10, Eric Blake wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> According to Andrew DeFaria on 8/30/2007 11:58 PM:
>> I'm always amazed how little people know about their own startup
>> environments and the reluctance to learn more about them thus improving
>> the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
According to Andrew DeFaria on 8/30/2007 11:58 PM:
> I'm always amazed how little people know about their own startup
> environments and the reluctance to learn more about them thus improving
> their environment and productivity. The -l option to bash
David Christensen wrote:
Steve Holden wrote:
Well there's no need to be so defensive. A simple "that doesn't
work", preferably with a following "because ..." would have been
quite adequate. Now I have seen your reply to Andrew DeFaria I am
somewhat better informed.
If my tone put you off, I ap
Steve Holden wrote:
> Well there's no need to be so defensive. A simple "that doesn't
> work", preferably with a following "because ..." would have been
> quite adequate. Now I have seen your reply to Andrew DeFaria I am
> somewhat better informed.
If my tone put you off, I apologize. Understand
David Christensen wrote:
Steve Holden wrote:
I posted alternative content for the batch script that would save you
from putting two unnecessary lines in the shell script. Or so I
thought.
The -l (or --login) option has bash read its usual startup files,
thereby avoiding the need four the course
Steve Holden wrote:
> I posted alternative content for the batch script that would save you
> from putting two unnecessary lines in the shell script. Or so I
> thought.
> The -l (or --login) option has bash read its usual startup files,
> thereby avoiding the need four the course (".") commands at
Andrew DeFaria wrote:
> I think he was saying that this:
>$ cat ssh-backup-all.bat
>C:\cygwin\bin\bash ./ssh-backup-all
>$ cat ssh-backup-all
>#! /bin/sh
>. /etc/profile
>. /home/dpchrist/.bash_profile
># do backup stuff
> could be reduced to this:
>$ cat ssh-bac
David Christensen wrote:
I wrote:
$ cat ssh-backup-all.bat
C:\cygwin\bin\bash ./ssh-backup-all
Steve Holden wrote:
Wouldn't it be possible to omit the first two executable lines and
have the batch script read
c:\cygwin\bin\bash -l ./ssh-backup-all
I posted a sample shell session
David Christensen wrote:
I wrote:
$ cat ssh-backup-all.bat
C:\cygwin\bin\bash ./ssh-backup-all
Steve Holden wrote:
Wouldn't it be possible to omit the first two executable lines and
have the batch script read
c:\cygwin\bin\bash -l ./ssh-backup-all
I posted a sample shell session. The "$ cat ss
I wrote:
> $ cat ssh-backup-all.bat
> C:\cygwin\bin\bash ./ssh-backup-all
Steve Holden wrote:
> Wouldn't it be possible to omit the first two executable lines and
> have the batch script read
> c:\cygwin\bin\bash -l ./ssh-backup-all
I posted a sample shell session. The "$ cat ssh-bac
Gary Johnson wrote:
The first time you do that, windows will complain it doesn't know what to do
with a sh file, and offer you the choice of looking up on the web or selecting
from a list which program you want to open .sh files with; choose the
select-from-a-list option, when the list appears
David Christensen wrote:
zip184 wrote:
I have some scripts I'd like to run without starting cygwin and
typing in their paths. Is there a way to make windows recognize that
a file is a bash/python script and run them like as if I ran them in
cygwin? I'd like to just be able to doubleclick them
zip184 wrote:
> I have some scripts I'd like to run without starting cygwin and
> typing in their paths. Is there a way to make windows recognize that
> a file is a bash/python script and run them like as if I ran them in
> cygwin? I'd like to just be able to doubleclick them in windows
> explore
On 2007-08-29, Dave Korn wrote:
> On 29 August 2007 17:59, zip184 wrote:
>
> > I have some scripts I'd like to run without starting cygwin and typing in
> > their paths. Is there a way to make windows recognize that a file is a
> > bash/python script and run them like as if I ran them in cygwin?
On 29 August 2007 17:59, zip184 wrote:
> I have some scripts I'd like to run without starting cygwin and typing in
> their paths. Is there a way to make windows recognize that a file is a
> bash/python script and run them like as if I ran them in cygwin? I'd like
> to just be able to doubleclick
17 matches
Mail list logo
