RE: Cygwin version 1.3.20

2003-07-23 Thread Igor Pechtchanski
On Mon, 21 Jul 2003, Henry Da Costa wrote: > Larry Hall wrote: > > Why do you only have the executable? Also, why can't the provider of > > this executable give you with the support you need? Strictly > > speaking, if the provider hasn't purchased a commercial license from > > Red Hat, they are

Re: Cygwin version 1.3.20

2003-07-22 Thread Peter A. Castro
On Mon, 21 Jul 2003, Max Bowsher wrote: > Henry Da Costa wrote: > > Hello Mr. Faylor, > > You have sent this message to a public mailing list. > > > I hope you can help me. I'm looking for a complete Cygwin version 1.3.20 > > set of packages but have so far been unable to find it. > > The phrase "

RE: Cygwin version 1.3.20

2003-07-21 Thread Henry Da Costa
Larry Hall wrote: > Why do you only have the executable? Also, why can't the provider of > this executable give you with the support you need? Strictly > speaking, if the provider hasn't purchased a commercial license from > Red Hat, they are legally bound by the GPL. If they aren't providing >

Re: Cygwin version 1.3.20

2003-07-21 Thread Larry Hall
Henry Da Costa wrote: Elfyn McBratney wrote: I will add this though: If you have a program that worked on 1.3.20* which does not work on 1.3.22* it's more productive to try and find out the cause of the problem rather than going back in time. If it turns out to be a problem in the Cygwin DLL, m

RE: Cygwin version 1.3.20

2003-07-21 Thread Henry Da Costa
Elfyn McBratney wrote: > I will add this though: If you have a program that worked on 1.3.20* which does > not work on 1.3.22* it's more productive to try and find out the cause of the > problem rather than going back in time. If it turns out to be a problem in the > Cygwin DLL, matbe the royal we

RE: Cygwin version 1.3.20

2003-07-21 Thread Elfyn McBratney
On Mon, 21 Jul 2003, Henry Da Costa wrote: > Max Bowsher wrote: > > You have sent this message to a public mailing list. > > Thanks for replying. I didn't realize that the "Christopher Faylor" link > at http://www.cygwin.com/ led to the cygwin mailing list. I should have > been more vigilant. Per

RE: Cygwin version 1.3.20

2003-07-21 Thread Henry Da Costa
Max Bowsher wrote: > You have sent this message to a public mailing list. Thanks for replying. I didn't realize that the "Christopher Faylor" link at http://www.cygwin.com/ led to the cygwin mailing list. I should have been more vigilant. > The phrase "complete Cygwin version 1.3.20 set of packag

Re: Cygwin version 1.3.20

2003-07-21 Thread Max Bowsher
Henry Da Costa wrote: > Hello Mr. Faylor, You have sent this message to a public mailing list. > I hope you can help me. I'm looking for a complete Cygwin version 1.3.20 > set of packages but have so far been unable to find it. The phrase "complete Cygwin version 1.3.20 set of packages" is meani