On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 07:05:56PM -0400, Larry Hall (Cygwin) wrote:
>On 6/18/2013 2:23 PM, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>> On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 01:07:56PM -0500, Ren? Berber wrote:
>>> On 6/18/2013 9:37 AM, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>>>
> There was a project out there many years ago which did
On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 11:07 AM, René Berber wrote:
> Here's another: http://atratus.org/
Aha. That's by Mike McCormack, a Codeweavers/Wine alum, who also did
http://ring3k.org/
I wonder how far atratus is from running wine.
At which point one could try running cygwin on wine on atratus on win
On 6/18/2013 2:23 PM, Christopher Faylor wrote:
On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 01:07:56PM -0500, Ren? Berber wrote:
On 6/18/2013 9:37 AM, Christopher Faylor wrote:
There was a project out there many years ago which did this. You could
run simple linux binaries on Windows. I offered to host the deve
On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 01:07:56PM -0500, Ren? Berber wrote:
>On 6/18/2013 9:37 AM, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>
>>> There was a project out there many years ago which did this. You could
>>> run simple linux binaries on Windows. I offered to host the development
>>> on sourceware.org (aka cygwin.
On 6/18/2013 9:37 AM, Christopher Faylor wrote:
There was a project out there many years ago which did this. You could
run simple linux binaries on Windows. I offered to host the development
on sourceware.org (aka cygwin.com) but, IIRC, the developer never
responded.
I don't remember what the
On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 10:33:08AM -0400, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 12:17:06PM +0200, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>>On Jun 18 10:56, Fedin Pavel wrote:
>>> [...]
>>> P.S. I have got even more crazy idea, perhaps deserving a separate topic...
>>> BSD systems have Linux binary c
On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 12:17:06PM +0200, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>On Jun 18 10:56, Fedin Pavel wrote:
>> [...]
>> P.S. I have got even more crazy idea, perhaps deserving a separate topic...
>> BSD systems have Linux binary compatibility layer. Could we have one ?
>> Technically this depends on ab
On Jun 18 16:06, Fedin Pavel wrote:
> Hello!
>
> While waiting for the Big Thing to finish compiling, another crazy idea
> visited my damaged brain. ;-) I wonder if it has some practical value...
>
> > That's not quite correct. The problem is not utilizing the native NT
> > functions to creat
Hello!
While waiting for the Big Thing to finish compiling, another crazy idea
visited my damaged brain. ;-) I wonder if it has some practical value...
> That's not quite correct. The problem is not utilizing the native NT
> functions to create a process image, the problem is that the Win32
>
Hello!
> > P.P.S. Perhaps the answer to (*) is NO, otherwise we would have fast
> > fork()...
>
> That's not quite correct. The problem is not utilizing the native NT
> functions to create a process image,
Wow, interesting...
I wonder if i could get a ELF with some plain hardcoded Windows s
On Jun 18 10:56, Fedin Pavel wrote:
> [...]
> P.S. I have got even more crazy idea, perhaps deserving a separate topic...
> BSD systems have Linux binary compatibility layer. Could we have one ?
> Technically this depends on ability to construct process image manually in
> Windows (*). Is it possi
Hello!
> > 1. Cygwin misses linux/types.h
>
> I have been trying to get this fixed upstream for quite some time
> without success:
>
> https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/6/11/604
> https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/10/15/608
> https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/4/28/84
Looks like Linux developers have taken over
On 2013-06-17 08:24, Fedin Pavel wrote:
In order to cross-compile Linux kernel i have to patch host-side tools a
little bit. Current problems are:
1. Cygwin misses linux/types.h
I have been trying to get this fixed upstream for quite some time
without success:
https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/
On 6/17/2013 11:18 AM, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
On Jun 17 17:24, Fedin Pavel wrote:
Hello!
In order to cross-compile Linux kernel i have to patch host-side tools a
little bit. Current problems are:
1. Cygwin misses linux/types.h
2. Cygwin defines the following ELF macros according to hos
On Jun 17 17:24, Fedin Pavel wrote:
> Hello!
>
> In order to cross-compile Linux kernel i have to patch host-side tools a
> little bit. Current problems are:
> 1. Cygwin misses linux/types.h
> 2. Cygwin defines the following ELF macros according to host machine:
> ELF_ST_BIND, ELF_ST_TYPE, ELF
15 matches
Mail list logo
