On 8/12/2021 8:56 AM, sten.kristian.ivars...@gmail.com wrote:
[snip]
I'm going to follow up on cygwin-developers.
Great, I'll read about it there
Does anyone know anything about the progress of this issue ?
I'm afraid there has not been any progress. We weren't able to find a solution
u
[snip]
> > I'm going to follow up on cygwin-developers.
>
> Great, I'll read about it there
Does anyone know anything about the progress of this issue ?
Best regards,
Kristian
> Keep up the good work
>
> Best regards,
> Kristian
>
> > Ken
--
Problem reports: https://cygwin.com/probl
> >> [snip]
> >>
> I tried SOCK_STREAM (and SOCK_SEQPACKET I think) for CYGWIN 3.2.0
> but that didn't work at all
>
> As far as I understand, both all types on pretty much all
> implementations preserves message ordering though
>
> I haven't tried SOCK_STREAM and
On 4/15/2021 11:01 AM, Ken Brown via Cygwin wrote:
On 4/15/2021 9:15 AM, sten.kristian.ivars...@gmail.com wrote:
[snip]
I tried SOCK_STREAM (and SOCK_SEQPACKET I think) for CYGWIN 3.2.0 but
that didn't work at all
As far as I understand, both all types on pretty much all
implementations prese
On 4/15/2021 9:15 AM, sten.kristian.ivars...@gmail.com wrote:
[snip]
I tried SOCK_STREAM (and SOCK_SEQPACKET I think) for CYGWIN 3.2.0 but
that didn't work at all
As far as I understand, both all types on pretty much all
implementations preserves message ordering though
I haven't tried SOCK_S
[snip]
> > I tried SOCK_STREAM (and SOCK_SEQPACKET I think) for CYGWIN 3.2.0 but
> > that didn't work at all
> >
> > As far as I understand, both all types on pretty much all
> > implementations preserves message ordering though
> >
> > I haven't tried SOCK_STREAM and/or SOCK_SEQPACKET with the
>
On 4/14/2021 1:14 PM, sten.kristian.ivars...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Ken
Using AF_UNIX/SOCK_DGRAM with current version (3.2.0)
seems
to
drop messages or at least they are not received in the same
order they are sent
[snip]
Thanks for the test case. I can confirm the problem. I'm not
famil
> >> Hi Ken
> >>
> >>> Using AF_UNIX/SOCK_DGRAM with current version (3.2.0)
> seems
> >>> to
> >>> drop messages or at least they are not received in the same
> >>> order they are sent
> >>>
> >>> [snip]
> >>>
> Thanks for the test case. I can confirm
On 4/13/2021 6:43 PM, Ken Brown via Cygwin wrote:
On 4/13/2021 10:47 AM, Ken Brown via Cygwin wrote:
On 4/13/2021 10:06 AM, sten.kristian.ivars...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Ken
Using AF_UNIX/SOCK_DGRAM with current version (3.2.0) seems
to
drop messages or at least they are not received in the sa
On 4/13/2021 10:47 AM, Ken Brown via Cygwin wrote:
On 4/13/2021 10:06 AM, sten.kristian.ivars...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Ken
Using AF_UNIX/SOCK_DGRAM with current version (3.2.0) seems
to
drop messages or at least they are not received in the same
order they are sent
[snip]
Thanks for the t
On 4/13/2021 10:06 AM, sten.kristian.ivars...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Ken
Using AF_UNIX/SOCK_DGRAM with current version (3.2.0) seems
to
drop messages or at least they are not received in the same
order they are sent
[snip]
Thanks for the test case. I can confirm the problem. I'm not
famil
Hi Ken
> Using AF_UNIX/SOCK_DGRAM with current version (3.2.0) seems
> to
> drop messages or at least they are not received in the same
> order they are sent
>
> [snip]
>
> > Thanks for the test case. I can confirm the problem. I'm not
> > famil
On 4/8/2021 3:47 PM, sten.kristian.ivars...@gmail.com wrote:
Using AF_UNIX/SOCK_DGRAM with current version (3.2.0) seems
to
drop messages or at least they are not received in the same
order they are sent
[snip]
Thanks for the test case. I can confirm the problem. I'm not
familiar enough
> > Using AF_UNIX/SOCK_DGRAM with current version (3.2.0) seems
> > to
> > drop messages or at least they are not received in the same
> > order they are sent
> >
> > [snip]
> >
> > > Thanks for the test case. I can confirm the problem. I'm not
> > >
> Using AF_UNIX/SOCK_DGRAM with current version (3.2.0) seems
> to
> drop messages or at least they are not received in the same
> order they are sent
>
> [snip]
>
> > Thanks for the test case. I can confirm the problem. I'm not
> > familiar enou
On 4/6/2021 10:50 AM, sten.kristian.ivars...@gmail.com wrote:
Using AF_UNIX/SOCK_DGRAM with current version (3.2.0) seems to
drop messages or at least they are not received in the same order
they are sent
[snip]
Thanks for the test case. I can confirm the problem. I'm not
familiar enough
On 4/6/2021 10:50 AM, sten.kristian.ivars...@gmail.com wrote:
Using AF_UNIX/SOCK_DGRAM with current version (3.2.0) seems to
drop messages or at least they are not received in the same order
they are sent
[snip]
Thanks for the test case. I can confirm the problem. I'm not
familiar enough
On 4/6/2021 3:52 AM, Noel Grandin wrote:
On 2021/04/01 6:02 pm, Ken Brown via Cygwin wrote:
Here's the issue, briefly. The communication is done via a Windows named
pipe. The receiver creates the pipe when it creates and binds its socket. It
creates only one pipe instance. The sender conne
> >> Using AF_UNIX/SOCK_DGRAM with current version (3.2.0) seems to
> >> drop messages or at least they are not received in the same order
> >> they are sent
> >>
> >> [snip]
> >>
> >>> Thanks for the test case. I can confirm the problem. I'm not
> >>> familiar enough with the curre
On 2021/04/01 6:02 pm, Ken Brown via Cygwin wrote:
Here's the issue, briefly. The communication is done via a Windows named pipe. The receiver creates the pipe when it
creates and binds its socket. It creates only one pipe instance. The sender connects to the pipe, writes, and closes
its h
n 3/31/2021 11:07 AM, Ken Brown via Cygwin wrote:
On 3/31/2021 4:24 AM, sten.kristian.ivars...@gmail.com wrote:
[snip]
Using AF_UNIX/SOCK_DGRAM with current version (3.2.0) seems to drop
messages or at least they are not received in the same order they
are sent
[snip]
Thanks for the test c
On 3/31/2021 4:24 AM, sten.kristian.ivars...@gmail.com wrote:
[snip]
Using AF_UNIX/SOCK_DGRAM with current version (3.2.0) seems to drop
messages or at least they are not received in the same order they
are sent
[snip]
Thanks for the test case. I can confirm the problem. I'm not familiar
[snip]
> >>> Using AF_UNIX/SOCK_DGRAM with current version (3.2.0) seems to drop
> >>> messages or at least they are not received in the same order they
> >>> are sent
[snip]
> Thanks for the test case. I can confirm the problem. I'm not familiar enough
> with the current AF_UNIX implementati
On 3/24/2021 5:18 AM, Kristian Ivarsson via Cygwin wrote:
Hi Glenn
Thanks for the reply, so more below
Hi all
Using AF_UNIX/SOCK_DGRAM with current version (3.2.0) seems to drop messages
or at least they are not received in the same order they are sent
Attached C:ish (with C++ threads tho
Hi Glenn
Thanks for the reply, so more below
> > Hi all
> >
> > Using AF_UNIX/SOCK_DGRAM with current version (3.2.0) seems to drop
> > messages or at least they are not received in the same order they are sent
> >
> > Attached C:ish (with C++ threads though) sample program that essentially
On Tue, Mar 23, 2021 at 04:37:52PM +0100, Kristian Ivarsson via Cygwin wrote:
> Hi all
>
> Using AF_UNIX/SOCK_DGRAM with current version (3.2.0) seems to drop messages
> or at least they are not received in the same order they are sent
>
> Attached C:ish (with C++ threads though) sample program
26 matches
Mail list logo
