Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Updated: bash-4.1.13-6

2014-09-29 Thread Eric Blake
On 09/29/2014 04:52 PM, Buchbinder, Barry (NIH/NIAID) [E] wrote: >> These functions contain '-' in their name; that's a limitation of >> the downstream forked patch I applied early to get 4.1.13-6 out the >> door. Upstream solved it in a nicer manner, so you can once again have >> functions with '-

RE: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Updated: bash-4.1.13-6

2014-09-29 Thread Buchbinder, Barry (NIH/NIAID) [E]
Eric Blake sent the following at Monday, September 29, 2014 5:29 PM >On 09/29/2014 03:23 PM, Buchbinder, Barry (NIH/NIAID) [E] wrote: >> Eric Blake (cygwin) sent the following at Saturday, September 27, 2014 2:14 >> AM >> >> Using the new version of bash, two scripts that I use have both started

Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Updated: bash-4.1.13-6

2014-09-29 Thread Eric Blake
On 09/29/2014 03:23 PM, Buchbinder, Barry (NIH/NIAID) [E] wrote: > Eric Blake (cygwin) sent the following at Saturday, September 27, 2014 2:14 AM > > Using the new version of bash, two scripts that I use have both started > giving me > the following error message(s). > > /usr/bin/bash: error imp

RE: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Updated: bash-4.1.13-6

2014-09-29 Thread Buchbinder, Barry (NIH/NIAID) [E]
Eric Blake (cygwin) sent the following at Saturday, September 27, 2014 2:14 AM Using the new version of bash, two scripts that I use have both started giving me the following error message(s). /usr/bin/bash: error importing function definition for `BASH_FUNC_make-log' /usr/bin/bash: error import

Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Updated: bash-4.1.13-6

2014-09-29 Thread Achim Gratz
Eric Blake writes: > On 09/29/2014 10:14 AM, Achim Gratz wrote: >> Eric Blake (cygwin) writes: >>> A new release of bash, 4.1.13-6, has been uploaded and will soon reach a >>> mirror near you; leaving the previous version at 4.12-5. >> >> Just out of curiosity, why is this release version -6 inste

Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Updated: bash-4.1.13-6

2014-09-29 Thread Eric Blake
On 09/29/2014 10:14 AM, Achim Gratz wrote: > Eric Blake (cygwin) writes: >> A new release of bash, 4.1.13-6, has been uploaded and will soon reach a >> mirror near you; leaving the previous version at 4.12-5. > > Just out of curiosity, why is this release version -6 instead of -1? Because of how

Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Updated: bash-4.1.13-6

2014-09-29 Thread Achim Gratz
Eric Blake (cygwin) writes: > A new release of bash, 4.1.13-6, has been uploaded and will soon reach a > mirror near you; leaving the previous version at 4.12-5. Just out of curiosity, why is this release version -6 instead of -1? Regards, Achim. -- +<[Q+ Matrix-12 WAVE#46+305 Neuron microQkb A

Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Updated: bash-4.1.13-6

2014-09-29 Thread Yaakov Selkowitz
On 2014-09-29 09:18, Buchbinder, Barry (NIH/NIAID) [E] wrote: Eric Blake (cygwin) sent the following at Saturday, September 27, 2014 2:14 AM I also turned on the (undocumented) 'bash --wordexp' mode (actually, that happened in 4.1.12-5, although I failed to mention it at the time), which allows

RE: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Updated: bash-4.1.13-6

2014-09-29 Thread Buchbinder, Barry (NIH/NIAID) [E]
Eric Blake (cygwin) sent the following at Saturday, September 27, 2014 2:14 AM >I also turned on the (undocumented) 'bash --wordexp' mode (actually, >that happened in 4.1.12-5, although I failed to mention it at the time), >which allows the C library call wordexp() to now function. From a user sta