Re: Problem reporting (was 1.5.21-1: CIFS symlinks on network share break Cygwin)

2006-10-25 Thread Christopher Faylor
On Wed, Oct 25, 2006 at 06:28:37PM -0400, Larry Hall (Cygwin) wrote: >Christopher Faylor wrote: >>On Wed, Oct 25, 2006 at 03:07:19PM -0500, DePriest, Jason R. wrote: >>>On 10/25/06, DePriest, Jason R. <> wrote: On 10/25/06, Larry Hall (Cygwin) <> wrote: >Certainly this and quoting raw email

Re: Problem reporting (was 1.5.21-1: CIFS symlinks on network share break Cygwin)

2006-10-25 Thread Larry Hall (Cygwin)
Christopher Faylor wrote: On Wed, Oct 25, 2006 at 03:07:19PM -0500, DePriest, Jason R. wrote: On 10/25/06, DePriest, Jason R. <> wrote: On 10/25/06, Larry Hall (Cygwin) <> wrote: Certainly this and quoting raw email addresses could be offered as guidelines in .

Re: Problem reporting (was 1.5.21-1: CIFS symlinks on network share break Cygwin)

2006-10-25 Thread Christopher Faylor
On Wed, Oct 25, 2006 at 03:07:19PM -0500, DePriest, Jason R. wrote: >On 10/25/06, DePriest, Jason R. <> wrote: >>On 10/25/06, Larry Hall (Cygwin) <> wrote: >>> Certainly this and quoting raw email addresses could be offered as >>> guidelines in . Care to offer a >>

Problem reporting (was 1.5.21-1: CIFS symlinks on network share break Cygwin)

2006-10-25 Thread DePriest, Jason R.
On 10/25/06, DePriest, Jason R. <> wrote: On 10/25/06, Larry Hall (Cygwin) <> wrote: > Certainly this and quoting raw email addresses could be offered as > guidelines in . Care to offer a > patch The "submitting a patch" guidelines seem to refer to program patch