Hi,
By seeing these hot discussions of -mno-cygwin swich I started a canadian
cross for building a mingw hosted SH targetted cross compiler on cygwin
environment. I am stuck with the following problem.
Will be very thankful if anybody guides me on this?
Regards,
Anita
- Original Message
> Subject: Re: Potential problems with Cygwin GCC and -mno-cygwin switch
> Date: Tue, 8 Jan 2002 17:29:14 -0500
> From: "Soren Andersen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> On 26 Dec 2001 at 20:33, Jon Leichter wrote:
>
> > I have a
Soren, you may find this an interesting read.
http://www.tuxedo.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html. It attempts to
explain some of the motivations behind a few (not all) of the brusque
behaviours exhibited by many hacker communities (and those lead by
hackers even if not exclusively composed there
cgf wrote:
> Hmm. Have you been reading the mingw mailing lists? That wasn't clear. I
> don't see any messages from you but I've only been archiving them since
> August or so.
And ... does that (august of 2001) seem like a long time ago, to you? So
that you can feel pretty confident about bei
On Tue, Jan 08, 2002 at 08:55:12PM -0500, Soren Andersen wrote:
>On 8 Jan 2002 at 19:14, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>>They don't seem to have anyone like me, for instance. :-)
>
>I don't know what to make of that, precisely. It doesn't seem to me
>that you manifest particularly obnoxious behavior
Christopher Faylor wrote:
> Off the top of my head, there are a few issues with mingw support in
> cygwin gcc (I think most if not all have already been mentioned):
>
> 1) It's supported by me currently. While I have no problem with mingw as
>an entity, it's not my project, and maintaining
Christopher Faylor wrote
> I've been reading the mingw mailing lists for a while and I really don't
> see anything like this. Most of the replies are very courteous.
>
> They don't seem to have anyone like me, for instance. :-)
Speaking of single-handedly destroying the open source movement
On 8 Jan 2002 at 19:14, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 08, 2002 at 05:29:14PM -0500, Soren Andersen wrote:
> >This lack of sponsorship maybe is also part of the noted tendency for
> >minGW priciple persons to manifest some, uhh, let's say testiness.
>
> I've been reading the mingw maili
On Tue, Jan 08, 2002 at 05:29:14PM -0500, Soren Andersen wrote:
>This lack of sponsorship maybe is also part of the noted tendency for
>minGW priciple persons to manifest some, uhh, let's say testiness.
I've been reading the mingw mailing lists for a while and I really don't
see anything like thi
On 26 Dec 2001 at 20:33, Jon Leichter wrote:
> It's been a long time since I was active on this list. I have not used
> Cygwin for over a year, until recently. I see that Cygwin has been updated
> quite a bit since I last used it. It's very nice to see these new features.
Me too (well that made
Lapo Luchini wrote:
>>Yeah, and we can kiss that pesky "UNIX emulation" claim of cygwin's
>>goodbye, too. Somehow, I don't think that you'll find many library
>>files in /usr/lib/cygwin on, say, HP/UX, Linux, Tru64, etc.
>>
>>This method solves a "problem" for -mno-cygwin at the expense of
>>imp
> Yeah, and we can kiss that pesky "UNIX emulation" claim of cygwin's
> goodbye, too. Somehow, I don't think that you'll find many library
> files in /usr/lib/cygwin on, say, HP/UX, Linux, Tru64, etc.
>
> This method solves a "problem" for -mno-cygwin at the expense of
> impacting many other pack
> - Original Message -
> From: "Jon Leichter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > However , once gcc's specs are changedm linking with the libraries
> they
> > > provide will fail - which is what I was talking about.
> >
> > Hmm... I'm not sure why this would be the case. I have relocated my
> > lib
- Original Message -
From: "Jon Leichter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > However , once gcc's specs are changedm linking with the libraries
they
> > provide will fail - which is what I was talking about.
>
> Hmm... I'm not sure why this would be the case. I have relocated my
> libraries, and I ha
On Thu, Dec 27, 2001 at 06:46:25PM -0800, Jon Leichter wrote:
>>From: Robert Collins [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>>However , once gcc's specs are changed linking with the libraries they
>>provide will fail - which is what I was talking about.
>
>Hmm... I'm not sure why this would be the case. I h
> -Original Message-
> From: Robert Collins [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2001 6:35 PM
> To: Jon Leichter
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Potential problems with Cygwin GCC and -mno-cygwin switch
>
> However , once gcc's sp
- Original Message -
From: "Jon Leichter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> I was not talking about pre-packaged Cygwin binaries. And I still
claim that
> even after you install Cygwin packages, they will operate if you
relocate
> the libraries in /usr/lib. This is because the Cygwin binaries depend
o
depend on
DLLs accessible via the PATH, which are NOT relocated from /usr/bin.
Jon
> -Original Message-
> From: Robert Collins [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2001 6:23 PM
> To: Jon Leichter
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Potential problems w
- Original Message -
From: "Jon Leichter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Most libraries included with packages install in /usr/local/lib
(opposed to
> /usr/lib). As for libraries that it may depend upon, as long as my GCC
specs
> file knows where to find libraries, I don't see a problem.
Please ch
Sorry Chris... just some final words...
> -Original Message-
> From: Robert Collins [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2001 5:28 AM
> To: Jon Leichter; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Potential problems with Cygwin GCC and -mno-cygwin switch
>
On Thu, Dec 27, 2001 at 12:02:46PM -0500, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>On Fri, Dec 28, 2001 at 12:28:22AM +1100, Robert Collins wrote:
>>> =
>>>
>>>3) There's a problem with Cygwin-specific libraries residing in
>>>/usr/lib. ... I, of course, updated the specs file to accomodate
>>>this.
On Fri, Dec 28, 2001 at 12:28:22AM +1100, Robert Collins wrote:
>> =
>>
>>3) There's a problem with Cygwin-specific libraries residing in
>>/usr/lib. ... I, of course, updated the specs file to accomodate
>>this. My environment now works flawlessly. When OpenLDAP looks for
>>libncurses
- Original Message -
From: "Jon Leichter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> 1) MinGW support in Cygwin GCC is flaky and buggy
That pages suggests that is _has been_ f & b - and it has. It's better
now than it ever has been, and still has ... quirks.
> 2) MinGW support in Cygwin GCC will possibly be
Hello all.
It's been a long time since I was active on this list. I have not used
Cygwin for over a year, until recently. I see that Cygwin has been updated
quite a bit since I last used it. It's very nice to see these new features.
I have a couple of issues to discuss about Cygwin GCC and it's
24 matches
Mail list logo
