Christopher Faylor wrote
> I've been reading the mingw mailing lists for a while and I really don't > see anything like this. Most of the replies are very courteous. > > They don't seem to have anyone like me, for instance. :-) Speaking of single-handedly destroying the open source movement, <G>, check out the summary of last week's linux-kernel mailing list over here: http://kt.zork.net/kernel-traffic/latest.html (Jan 7) Talk about acrimony -- and that's between the core developers -- Rik van Riel wrote the (old) VM, Al Viro is active in the virtual file system layer, Andre' is the [lone] open source representative on the ATA standards definition committee, and then of course there's Linus. Some juicy quotes: Which, btw, explains why I don't consider you a kernel maintainer, Rik, and I don't tend to apply any patches at all from you. -- Linus [Linus,] please pass your crack pipe arounds so the rest of us idiots can see your vision or lack of .. -- Andre' Hendrick [to Andre']: I've long since noticed that we cannot communicate...If you have patches, please talk to Jens, tell him what the issues are, and I know I can communicate with him. -- Linus And there was lots of complaining about the lack of "quality" of the posts on lkml. It ain't just cygwin@. And it ain't just cgf. --Chuck -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
