Arash Partow wrote:
> What kernel version and what NPTL version do you have installed?
Kernel version 2.6.10 and glibc 2.3.2 as packaged by Debian unstable. I
don't know whether they configure glibc for LinuxThreads or NPTL for
this package.
Under FreeBSD-5.4 I get the following:
$ ./example1
Hi Brian,
What kernel version and what NPTL version do you have installed?
Kind regards
Arash Partow
__
Be one who knows what they don't know,
Instead of being one who knows not what they don't know,
Thinking they know everything about all thi
Arash Partow wrote:
> I've done a clean install of cygwin with dll 1.5.18 and also tried
> snapshots from 2nd, 4th and 5th. Unfortunetly issues relating to
> threading and memory leaks as described in the following post - still
> exists:
>
> http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/2005-06/msg00186.ht
On Wed, Jul 06, 2005 at 04:17:34AM +, Arash Partow wrote:
>I have the mutex set to default mode, and after a few seconds of the
>test running mutexes locking unlocking, all of a sudden the mutexes
>stop locking, and basically report back EBUSY from pthread_mutex_lock.
The message that you are
Hi Chris,
Actually things are getting slightly worse, basically same test scenario
(not the full blown app you keep on mentioning), but this time mutex
locks are failing + the ye-olde massive memory leaks.
I have the mutex set to default mode, and after a few seconds of the
test running mutexes
On Wed, Jul 06, 2005 at 01:36:54AM +, Arash Partow wrote:
>I've done a clean install of cygwin with dll 1.5.18 and also tried
>snapshots from 2nd, 4th and 5th. Unfortunetly issues relating to
>threading and memory leaks as described in the following post - still
>exists:
>
>http://sources.redh
Hi Chris,
I've done a clean install of cygwin with dll 1.5.18 and also tried
snapshots from 2nd, 4th and 5th. Unfortunetly issues relating to
threading and memory leaks as described in the following post - still
exists:
http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/2005-06/msg00186.html
Regards
Ar
Yeah, I tried the June 30th snapshot.
On Jul 1, 2005, at 1:21 PM, Christopher Faylor wrote:
On Fri, Jul 01, 2005 at 01:09:21PM -0700, Peter Rehley wrote:
My tests indicated that the changes are working correctly.
You did try the snapshot, right? I neglected to mention that I had to
make some
On Fri, Jul 01, 2005 at 04:21:20PM -0400, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>On Fri, Jul 01, 2005 at 01:09:21PM -0700, Peter Rehley wrote:
>>My tests indicated that the changes are working correctly.
>
>You did try the snapshot, right? I neglected to mention that I had to
>make some corresponding changes
On Fri, Jul 01, 2005 at 01:09:21PM -0700, Peter Rehley wrote:
>My tests indicated that the changes are working correctly.
You did try the snapshot, right? I neglected to mention that I had to
make some corresponding changes to the DLL beyond the below changes.
I don't know exactly when I did that
My tests indicated that the changes are working correctly.
Peter
On Jun 30, 2005, at 8:23 PM, Christopher Faylor wrote:
We're coming close to a 1.5.18 release. Please try the latest snapshot
at http://cygwin.com/snapshots/ and help verify that there are no
regresions against 1.5.17.
I'm part
We're coming close to a 1.5.18 release. Please try the latest snapshot
at http://cygwin.com/snapshots/ and help verify that there are no
regresions against 1.5.17.
I'm particularly interested in hearing if the changes made (at users's
requests) to the default mutex handling in pthread.h are worki
12 matches
Mail list logo
