Hi folks,
I'd like to create a 1.7.19 Cygwin package soon. It doesn't fix all
problems introduced in 1.7.18, but it should fix at least some of
them and, hopefully, don't make anything worse. The SIGUSR1 problem
reported a few weeks ago is not yet fixed, though.
So I'd like to ask you to give
Corinna Vinschen wrote:
On Jul 14 11:42, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
On Jul 14 11:32, Angelo Graziosi wrote:
Christopher Faylor wrote:
I've just created a snapshot which may, barring any conflagrations, be
very close to what will show up as 1.5.21. If there are no major
regressions from 1.5.20,
On Fri, Jul 14, 2006 at 12:16:12PM +0200, Angelo Graziosi wrote:
>Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>
>> Well, Monday. Isn't that explicit enough? Do you also need the year?
>
>
>The original post (http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2006-07/msg00188.html) was
>dated 20060707.
>
>Perhaps it would be sufficient a 1
On Jul 14 12:16, Angelo Graziosi wrote:
>
> Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>
> > Well, Monday. Isn't that explicit enough? Do you also need the year?
>
>
> The original post (http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2006-07/msg00188.html) was
> dated 20060707.
>
> Perhaps it would be sufficient a 1.5.20-2 that
Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> Well, Monday. Isn't that explicit enough? Do you also need the year?
The original post (http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2006-07/msg00188.html) was
dated 20060707.
Perhaps it would be sufficient a 1.5.20-2 that fix this
http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2006-07/msg00145.html.
On Jul 14 11:42, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> On Jul 14 11:32, Angelo Graziosi wrote:
> >
> >
> > Christopher Faylor wrote:
> >
> > > I've just created a snapshot which may, barring any conflagrations, be
> > > very close to what will show up as 1.5.21. If there are no major
> > > regressions from
On Jul 14 11:32, Angelo Graziosi wrote:
>
>
> Christopher Faylor wrote:
>
> > I've just created a snapshot which may, barring any conflagrations, be
> > very close to what will show up as 1.5.21. If there are no major
> > regressions from 1.5.20, I plan on releasing cygwin 1.5.21 on Monday.
>
Christopher Faylor wrote:
> I've just created a snapshot which may, barring any conflagrations, be
> very close to what will show up as 1.5.21. If there are no major
> regressions from 1.5.20, I plan on releasing cygwin 1.5.21 on Monday.
Which Monday ?
Cheers,
Angelo.
--
Unsubscribe
On Jul 7 12:11, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> I've just created a snapshot which may, barring any conflagrations, be
> very close to what will show up as 1.5.21. If there are no major
> regressions from 1.5.20, I plan on releasing cygwin 1.5.21 on Monday.
>
> The fixes that I can infer from the Ch
I've just created a snapshot which may, barring any conflagrations, be
very close to what will show up as 1.5.21. If there are no major
regressions from 1.5.20, I plan on releasing cygwin 1.5.21 on Monday.
The fixes that I can infer from the ChangeLog are:
- block current signal while executin
On Fri, May 20, 2005 at 01:33:29AM +0200, Gerrit P. Haase wrote:
>[EMAIL PROTECTED] /
>$ ls -l /usr/bin/cygcheck.exe
>-rwxr-xr-x 1 gerrit Dom?nen-Admins 2833975 May 19 07:46
>/usr/bin/cygcheck.exe*
>
>And I get a crash when I run `cygcheck -svr'.
Corinna guided me towards reproducing this proble
> Just for the records: It should also fix the socket problem on
> postgresql, loosing the socket file attributes on touch().
Yes, I had the same problem with screen, and it is fixed in 2005-05-17.
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports: http://
Gerrit P. Haase wrote:
Christopher Faylor wrote:
On Fri, May 20, 2005 at 01:38:58AM +0200, Gerrit P. Haase wrote:
Gerrit P. Haase wrote:
Christopher Faylor wrote:
On Fri, May 20, 2005 at 12:05:06AM +0200, Gerrit P. Haase wrote:
Gerrit P. Haase wrote:
Corinna Vinschen wrote:
We would like to release
Christopher Faylor wrote:
On Fri, May 20, 2005 at 01:38:58AM +0200, Gerrit P. Haase wrote:
Gerrit P. Haase wrote:
Christopher Faylor wrote:
On Fri, May 20, 2005 at 12:05:06AM +0200, Gerrit P. Haase wrote:
Gerrit P. Haase wrote:
Corinna Vinschen wrote:
We would like to release 1.5.17 soon.
Plea
On Thu, May 19, 2005 at 10:22:13PM -0400, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>On Fri, May 20, 2005 at 04:17:48AM +0200, Krzysztof Duleba wrote:
>>Christopher Faylor wrote:
>>
>>> >> Program exited normally.
>>> >> (gdb)
>>> >
>>> >Well, that's the funny thing about Cygwin's gdb.
>>>
>>>No, that's the funny
On Fri, May 20, 2005 at 04:17:48AM +0200, Krzysztof Duleba wrote:
>Christopher Faylor wrote:
>
>> >> Program exited normally.
>> >> (gdb)
>> >
>> >Well, that's the funny thing about Cygwin's gdb.
>>
>>No, that's the funny thing about debugging in general. There's nothing
>>special about cygwin's
Christopher Faylor wrote:
> >> Program exited normally.
> >> (gdb)
> >
> >Well, that's the funny thing about Cygwin's gdb.
>
> No, that's the funny thing about debugging in general. There's nothing
> special about cygwin's gdb.
Really? I'd expect something more like this:
(gdb) run
Starting pr
On Fri, May 20, 2005 at 01:38:58AM +0200, Gerrit P. Haase wrote:
>Gerrit P. Haase wrote:
>
>>Christopher Faylor wrote:
>>
>>>On Fri, May 20, 2005 at 12:05:06AM +0200, Gerrit P. Haase wrote:
>>>
Gerrit P. Haase wrote:
>Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>
>
>>We would like to release 1
On Fri, May 20, 2005 at 02:28:41AM +0200, Krzysztof Duleba wrote:
>Gerrit P. Haase wrote:
>>
>> Ah, and the funny thing, it works well when running under gdb:
>>
>> This GDB was configured as "i686-pc-cygwin"...
>> (gdb) run -svr
>> Starting program: /usr/bin/cygcheck.exe -svr
>> warning: LDR: Auto
Gerrit P. Haase wrote:
>
> Ah, and the funny thing, it works well when running under gdb:
>
> This GDB was configured as "i686-pc-cygwin"...
> (gdb) run -svr
> Starting program: /usr/bin/cygcheck.exe -svr
> warning: LDR: Automatic DLL Relocation in cygcheck.exe
>
> warning: LDR: Dll GDI32.dll base
Gerrit P. Haase wrote:
Christopher Faylor wrote:
On Fri, May 20, 2005 at 12:05:06AM +0200, Gerrit P. Haase wrote:
Gerrit P. Haase wrote:
Corinna Vinschen wrote:
We would like to release 1.5.17 soon.
Please try the latest snapshot, 2005-May-17, from
http://cygwin.com/snapshots/
[...]
Please test
Christopher Faylor wrote:
On Fri, May 20, 2005 at 12:05:06AM +0200, Gerrit P. Haase wrote:
Gerrit P. Haase wrote:
Corinna Vinschen wrote:
We would like to release 1.5.17 soon.
Please try the latest snapshot, 2005-May-17, from
http://cygwin.com/snapshots/
[...]
Please test,
Corinna
I tried the
On Fri, May 20, 2005 at 12:05:06AM +0200, Gerrit P. Haase wrote:
>Gerrit P. Haase wrote:
>>Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>>
>>>We would like to release 1.5.17 soon.
>>>
>>>Please try the latest snapshot, 2005-May-17, from
>>>http://cygwin.com/snapshots/
>>
>>
>>[...]
>>
>>>Please test,
>>>Corinna
>>
>>
Gerrit P. Haase wrote:
Corinna Vinschen wrote:
We would like to release 1.5.17 soon.
Please try the latest snapshot, 2005-May-17, from
http://cygwin.com/snapshots/
[...]
Please test,
Corinna
I tried the snapshot from 2005-05-19 and my postgres problems are fixed
now (was broken after the upgrade
Corinna Vinschen wrote:
We would like to release 1.5.17 soon.
Please try the latest snapshot, 2005-May-17, from http://cygwin.com/snapshots/
[...]
Please test,
Corinna
I tried the snapshot from 2005-05-19 and my postgres problems are fixed
now (was broken after the upgrade to 1.5.16 recently).
Gerr
Corinna Vinschen wrote:
We would like to release 1.5.17 soon.
Please try the latest snapshot, 2005-May-17, from http://cygwin.com/snapshots/
$ ls //
using Ctrl-C if the ls call takes too long.
I have looked at the file_chooser (win32 gui) demo from
the fltk package.
When you enter // as path in t
On Wed, May 18, 2005 at 09:12:20AM +0800, Carlo Florendo wrote:
>Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>>We would like to release 1.5.17 soon.
>>
>>Please try the latest snapshot, 2005-May-17, from
>>http://cygwin.com/snapshots/
>>
>>This snapshot should solve two problems with cygcheck and strace. The
>>previ
Reini Urban wrote:
> Just for the records: It should also fix the socket problem on
> postgresql, loosing the socket file attributes on touch().
Well, it's been fixed since 2005-05-10 snapshot, thanks to Corinna.
Regards
Krzysztof Duleba
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubsc
Corinna Vinschen schrieb:
We would like to release 1.5.17 soon.
Please try the latest snapshot, 2005-May-17, from http://cygwin.com/snapshots/
This snapshot should solve two problems with cygcheck and strace. The
previous snapshots would not print anything on 9x and might end up reporting
a broken
We would like to release 1.5.17 soon.
Please try the latest snapshot, 2005-May-17, from http://cygwin.com/snapshots/
This snapshot should solve two problems with cygcheck and strace. The
previous snapshots would not print anything on 9x and might end up reporting
a broken installation on NT syst
[snip uberslow network traverse]
>
> I don't know if there is a reasonable way to speed this up,
> because you want to ensure that //machine exists before
> allowing `cd //machine' to succeed, but don't want to go
> stat'ing every machine on the network when doing a readdir() on //.
>
I can
On May 16 14:36, Eric Blake wrote:
> Corinna Vinschen cygwin.com> writes:
>
> >
> > We would like to release 1.5.17 soon.
> >
> > Please try the latest snapshot, 2005-May-13, from
> > http://cygwin.com/snapshots/
> >
> > Additional to a couple of bugfixes there's also a new feature which need
Corinna Vinschen cygwin.com> writes:
>
> We would like to release 1.5.17 soon.
>
> Please try the latest snapshot, 2005-May-13, from http://cygwin.com/snapshots/
>
> Additional to a couple of bugfixes there's also a new feature which needs a
> bit of testing. You can now list servers in the m
> This is per the Single Unix Specification; three or more slashes are
> required to be equivalent to one slash, while two slashes are
> explicitly reserved for operating system dependent behaviour (in
> cygwin's case, //server).
Thanks for the clarification Yitzchak - that does make sense.
So, a
On Mon, May 16, 2005 at 11:03:32AM +1000, Sonam Chauhan wrote:
> Corinna Vinschen said:
> > You can now list servers in the machine's domain/workgroup with
> >
> > $ ls //
>
> Since some (most?) Unix shells have a "convenience feature" to reinterpret
> multiple forward slashes as a single slash,
Original Message-
From: Corinna Vinschen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, 14 May 2005 8:07 AM
To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Subject: Please test latest snapshot
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.
On May 15 02:32, Eric Blake wrote:
> $ cygcheck -c cygwin
> $ echo $?
> 0
> $ strace cygcheck -c cygwin
> Cygwin Package Information
> Package VersionStatus
> cygwin 1.5.16-1 OK
> $ strace --help
> $ strace strace --help | head -n 1
> Usage: strace [OPTIONS]
> > Also, it appears that cygcheck is doing work, but not printing any output.
>
> -v, please. It prints a lot of stuff for me.
>
On my 266 MHz Win98 machine (yes, I know it is old, but it makes a great
regression tester):
$ mount -m
mount -f -s -b "d:/cygwin/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts" "/usr/X1
On May 14 19:44, Eric Blake wrote:
> > Additional to a couple of bugfixes there's also a new feature which needs a
> > bit of testing. You can now list servers in the machine's domain/workgroup
> > with
> >
> > $ ls //
> >
> > and accessible disk shares on a server with
> >
> > $ ls //serve
> Additional to a couple of bugfixes there's also a new feature which needs a
> bit of testing. You can now list servers in the machine's domain/workgroup
> with
>
> $ ls //
>
> and accessible disk shares on a server with
>
> $ ls //server
AWESOME! Thanks for doing this; it even worked on
We would like to release 1.5.17 soon.
Please try the latest snapshot, 2005-May-13, from http://cygwin.com/snapshots/
Additional to a couple of bugfixes there's also a new feature which needs a
bit of testing. You can now list servers in the machine's domain/workgroup
with
$ ls //
and accessi
41 matches
Mail list logo
