Corinna Vinschen wrote: > Well, Monday. Isn't that explicit enough? Do you also need the year?
The original post (http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2006-07/msg00188.html) was dated 20060707. Perhaps it would be sufficient a 1.5.20-2 that fix this http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2006-07/msg00145.html. In any case thanks a lot, Angelo. -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
