At 10:09 PM 3/31/2005, Larry Hall wrote:
> At 01:48 PM 3/31/2005, you wrote:
> >Hi,
> >
> >With cygwin1.dll version 1.5.13 exit codes to Windows (I use W2K and XP)
have
> >changed by a factor of 256 (shift of 8 bits) as mentioned in the 2 messages
> >cited below. I have processes running under Wi
AVT-Wien wrote:
> With cygwin1.dll version 1.5.13 exit codes to Windows (I use W2K and XP) have
> changed by a factor of 256 (shift of 8 bits) as mentioned in the 2 messages
> cited below. I have processes running under Windows shells that run several
> days, doing a lot of steps (both unix tools
At 01:48 PM 3/31/2005, you wrote:
>Hi,
>
>With cygwin1.dll version 1.5.13 exit codes to Windows (I use W2K and XP) have
>changed by a factor of 256 (shift of 8 bits) as mentioned in the 2 messages
>cited below. I have processes running under Windows shells that run several
>days, doing a lot of ste
Hi,
With cygwin1.dll version 1.5.13 exit codes to Windows (I use W2K and XP) have
changed by a factor of 256 (shift of 8 bits) as mentioned in the 2 messages
cited below. I have processes running under Windows shells that run several
days, doing a lot of steps (both unix tools like gawk, head, sor
Brian Bruns wrote:
> Yeah, I know of that post. I'm still _highly_ confused as to this -
> chalk it up to the fact I'm more used to dealing with return codes in
> Linux, so forgive my ignorance. I'm also not the greatest programmer
> in the world.
>
> Your telling me an exit code of 1 inside of
On Wed, Mar 02, 2005 at 03:58:22PM -0500, Brian Bruns wrote:
>On Wednesday, March 02, 2005 3:45 PM [EST], Christopher Faylor wrote:
>> http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/2005-01/msg01382.html
>
>Yeah, I know of that post. I'm still _highly_ confused as to this -
>chalk it up to the fact I'm more
On Wednesday, March 02, 2005 3:45 PM [EST], Christopher Faylor wrote:
>
> http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/2005-01/msg01382.html
>
Yeah, I know of that post. I'm still _highly_ confused as to this -
chalk it up to the fact I'm more used to dealing with return codes in
Linux, so forgive my ig
On Wed, Mar 02, 2005 at 03:30:00PM -0500, Brian Bruns wrote:
>Sorry to bring this up again, but I'm having issues again with Cygwin
>not passing error level codes back to the cmd shell.
>
>Example, when clamscan finds a virus, it issues a return code of 1.
>Inside of a Cygwin env it returns fine.
>
Hey all,
Sorry to bring this up again, but I'm having issues again with Cygwin
not passing error level codes back to the cmd shell.
Example, when clamscan finds a virus, it issues a return code of 1.
Inside of a Cygwin env it returns fine.
../test/clam.exe: ClamAV-Test-File FOUN
9 matches
Mail list logo
