Re: Link count wierdness

2014-07-18 Thread Christopher Faylor
On Fri, Jul 18, 2014 at 06:30:05AM +0200, Achim Gratz wrote: >Christopher Faylor writes: >> git isn't ready yet unfortunately. Can't you just download a recent >> snapshot? That should be good enough. > >I can download and install snapshots just fine. I'm running snapshots >for quite some time a

Re: Link count wierdness

2014-07-17 Thread Andrey Repin
Greetings, Achim Gratz! >> git isn't ready yet unfortunately. Can't you just download a recent >> snapshot? That should be good enough. > I can download and install snapshots just fine. I'm running snapshots > for quite some time already so there'd be nothing new on that front. >> FWIW, CVS i

Re: Link count wierdness

2014-07-17 Thread Achim Gratz
Christopher Faylor writes: > git isn't ready yet unfortunately. Can't you just download a recent > snapshot? That should be good enough. I can download and install snapshots just fine. I'm running snapshots for quite some time already so there'd be nothing new on that front. > FWIW, CVS is blo

Re: Link count wierdness

2014-07-17 Thread Christopher Faylor
On Thu, Jul 17, 2014 at 09:43:40PM +0200, Achim Gratz wrote: >Corinna Vinschen writes: >> Netapp inode numbers are not reliable and thus the number of links isn't >> either. There's a check in Cygwin which is the result of the early >> Cygwin 1.7 development. It does not report the number of hard

Re: Link count wierdness

2014-07-17 Thread Achim Gratz
Corinna Vinschen writes: > Netapp inode numbers are not reliable and thus the number of links isn't > either. There's a check in Cygwin which is the result of the early > Cygwin 1.7 development. It does not report the number of hardlinks > and it fakes the inode numbers on netapp filesystems. Ah

Re: Link count wierdness

2014-07-17 Thread Corinna Vinschen
On Jul 17 20:09, Achim Gratz wrote: > > I have come across an interesting problem with the link count on a > NetApp volume(*). While hardlinks can be created just fine and work as > you'd expect (changing one file changes all the linked files), the link > count that gets reported for each of the

Link count wierdness

2014-07-17 Thread Achim Gratz
I have come across an interesting problem with the link count on a NetApp volume(*). While hardlinks can be created just fine and work as you'd expect (changing one file changes all the linked files), the link count that gets reported for each of the linked files is always 1. ONe of those NetApp