Re: Java alternatives (was Re: Updated: stable compiler package gcc4-4.3.4-3)

2010-01-18 Thread Dave Korn
Yaakov (Cygwin/X) wrote: > On 10/01/2010 21:37, Dave Korn wrote: >> BTW I'm going to ship AWT with the next GCJ, if that's of any interest to >> anyone. It builds and appears to be passing the mauve testsuite, so >> that's probably worth chucking over the wall and letting people start >> playing

Re: Java alternatives (was Re: Updated: stable compiler package gcc4-4.3.4-3)

2010-01-10 Thread Yaakov (Cygwin/X)
On 10/01/2010 21:37, Dave Korn wrote: BTW I'm going to ship AWT with the next GCJ, if that's of any interest to anyone. It builds and appears to be passing the mauve testsuite, so that's probably worth chucking over the wall and letting people start playing with. Good idea, but a heads-up;

Re: Java alternatives (was Re: Updated: stable compiler package gcc4-4.3.4-3)

2010-01-10 Thread Dave Korn
Yaakov (Cygwin/X) wrote: Happy New Year, since then, BTW :) pardon me for taking a little time to reply. > On 11/12/2009 14:58, Dave Korn wrote: >> As part of its infrastructure, GCJ uses the Eclipse Compiler for Java >> (ECJ) > I still don't understand what the problem/worry is with licensin

Java alternatives (was Re: Updated: stable compiler package gcc4-4.3.4-3)

2009-12-28 Thread Yaakov (Cygwin/X)
On 11/12/2009 14:58, Dave Korn wrote: As part of its infrastructure, GCJ uses the Eclipse Compiler for Java (ECJ) to compile .java sources files to bytecode .class files. ECJ is shipped as a JAR file, and is not supplied in this distribution (pending resolution of licensing status and any self-h