Re: Hang with 20051018 (3rd version) snapshot while building OOo

Christopher Faylor wrote: > On Mon, Nov 21, 2005 at 01:08:25PM -0500, Volker Quetschke wrote: (snip) > I sent the above message on 20051116. The was a brief problem in the > 20051114 snapshot which was fixed. I don't know if that is what you saw > or not but I'm really only interested in the most

Re: Hang with 20051018 (3rd version) snapshot while building OOo

On Mon, Nov 21, 2005 at 01:08:25PM -0500, Volker Quetschke wrote: >Christopher Faylor wrote: >> On Tue, Nov 15, 2005 at 09:12:42AM -0500, Volker Quetschke wrote: >(snips) >>>Took a little longer, not to reproduce but to send, this time: >>> >> >> Ok. St

Re: Hang with 20051018 (3rd version) snapshot while building OOo

Hi! Christopher Faylor wrote: > On Tue, Nov 15, 2005 at 09:12:42AM -0500, Volker Quetschke wrote: (snips) >>Took a little longer, not to reproduce but to send, this time: >> > > Ok. Still hanging in the same place. > > I've taken one more shot in the

Re: Hang with 20051018 (3rd version) snapshot while building OOo

On Tue, Nov 15, 2005 at 09:12:42AM -0500, Volker Quetschke wrote: >(snip) >>>It's still hanging in a multimedia timer call, which is "interesting". >>> >>>The latest snapshot comments out the part of the code which sets the >>>timer resolution, on the off chance that setting it to 1ms is what is >>

Re: Hang with 20051018 (3rd version) snapshot while building OOo

(snip) It's still hanging in a multimedia timer call, which is "interesting". The latest snapshot comments out the part of the code which sets the timer resolution, on the off chance that setting it to 1ms is what is causing the problem. It's a long shot but please try out the latest snapshot.

Re: Hang with 20051018 (3rd version) snapshot while building OOo

> (snip) >>Unfortunately it still does hang. See here: >> for details. > > It's still hanging in a multimedia timer call, which is "interesting". > > The latest snapshot comments out the part of the code which sets the > timer resolution, on the off cha

Re: Hang with 20051018 (3rd version) snapshot while building OOo

On Nov 7 11:18, Volker Quetschke wrote: > (snip) > >>>There's a new snapshot with even more debugging available now. > >> > >>Here is the new strace: > > > > That one showed that cygwin was hanging in a windows function that > > shouldn't really hang.

Re: Hang with 20051018 (3rd version) snapshot while building OOo

On Mon, Nov 07, 2005 at 11:18:24AM -0500, Volker Quetschke wrote: >(snip) There's a new snapshot with even more debugging available now. >>> >>>Here is the new strace: >> >> That one showed that cygwin was hanging in a windows function that >> should

Re: Hang with 20051018 (3rd version) snapshot while building OOo

(snip) >>>There's a new snapshot with even more debugging available now. >> >>Here is the new strace: > > That one showed that cygwin was hanging in a windows function that > shouldn't really hang. I can't explain why but the new snapshot avoids > calli

Re: Hang with 20051018 (3rd version) snapshot while building OOo

Hi, Christopher Faylor wrote: [snip] > Actually, to clarify, I can explain why the new snapshot avoids calling [more snip] I just want to give you a bit of encouragement, in that at least I follow closely, this (rather long, necessarily so) thread, I really hope that it gets solved, just as a fi

Re: Hang with 20051018 (3rd version) snapshot while building OOo

On Sat, Nov 05, 2005 at 01:05:36AM -0500, Christopher Faylor wrote: >On Fri, Nov 04, 2005 at 02:15:10PM -0500, Volker Quetschke wrote: Even though it is the correct snapshot I didn't see many of your debug statements in the strace. >>> >>>Yes. So much for that theory. >>> >>>There's a new

Re: Hang with 20051018 (3rd version) snapshot while building OOo

On Fri, Nov 04, 2005 at 02:15:10PM -0500, Volker Quetschke wrote: >(snip) >>>Even though it is the correct snapshot I didn't see many of your >>>debug statements in the strace. >> >> Yes. So much for that theory. >> >> There's a new snapshot with even more debugging available now. > >Here is the

Re: Hang with 20051018 (3rd version) snapshot while building OOo

(snip) >>Even though it is the correct snapshot I didn't see many of your >>debug statements in the strace. > > Yes. So much for that theory. > > There's a new snapshot with even more debugging available now. Here is the new strace: Volker -- PGP/G

Re: Hang with 20051018 (3rd version) snapshot while building OOo

On Fri, Nov 04, 2005 at 10:44:56AM -0500, Volker Quetschke wrote: >(snip) >Corinna has informed me that I added the debugging output to the wrong >place >so I'm generating a new snapshot with the right debugging. Please use the >November 3 snapshot in your tests. >(snip) >> GAH! W

Re: Hang with 20051018 (3rd version) snapshot while building OOo

(snip) Corinna has informed me that I added the debugging output to the wrong place so I'm generating a new snapshot with the right debugging. Please use the November 3 snapshot in your tests. (snip) > GAH! What a stupid mistake. I made a change and didn't check it. There > was a rea

Re: Hang with 20051018 (3rd version) snapshot while building OOo

On Thu, Nov 03, 2005 at 06:46:31PM -0500, Volker Quetschke wrote: >Volker Quetschke wrote: >> (snip) >> >>>Corinna has informed me that I added the debugging output to the wrong place >>>so I'm generating a new snapshot with the right debugging. Please use the >>>November 3 snapshot in your tests

Re: Hang with 20051018 (3rd version) snapshot while building OOo

Volker Quetschke wrote: > (snip) > >>Corinna has informed me that I added the debugging output to the wrong place >>so I'm generating a new snapshot with the right debugging. Please use the >>November 3 snapshot in your tests. > > Just FYI, I tried the 20051102 snapshot and strace doesn't seem t

Re: Hang with 20051018 (3rd version) snapshot while building OOo

(snip) > Corinna has informed me that I added the debugging output to the wrong place > so I'm generating a new snapshot with the right debugging. Please use the > November 3 snapshot in your tests. Just FYI, I tried the 20051102 snapshot and strace doesn't seem to work at all in that version. Fo

Re: Hang with 20051018 (3rd version) snapshot while building OOo

On Thu, Nov 03, 2005 at 12:00:00AM -0500, Christopher Faylor wrote: >On Wed, Nov 02, 2005 at 02:49:50PM -0500, Volker Quetschke wrote: >>Hi! >> >>(snip) No, talktome has nothing to do with wait. That's the interface which is called when (among other things) you look at things in /proc. >>>

Re: Hang with 20051018 (3rd version) snapshot while building OOo

On Wed, Nov 02, 2005 at 02:49:50PM -0500, Volker Quetschke wrote: >Hi! > >(snip) >>>No, talktome has nothing to do with wait. That's the interface which is >>>called when (among other things) you look at things in /proc. >> >> Could you try today's snapshot (when it shows up)? It has more debugg

Re: Hang with 20051018 (3rd version) snapshot while building OOo

Hi! (snip) >>No, talktome has nothing to do with wait. That's the interface which is >>called when (among other things) you look at things in /proc. > > Could you try today's snapshot (when it shows up)? It has more debugging > which might help show where the hang is occurring. Here it is:

Re: Hang with 20051018 (3rd version) snapshot while building OOo

On Tue, Nov 01, 2005 at 05:40:30PM -0500, Christopher Faylor wrote: >On Tue, Nov 01, 2005 at 05:15:31PM -0500, Volker Quetschke wrote: >>Volker Quetschke wrote: >>> OK, here is the full version: >>> >>> >>> It contains the usual cygchec

Re: Hang with 20051018 (3rd version) snapshot while building OOo

On Tue, Nov 01, 2005 at 05:15:31PM -0500, Volker Quetschke wrote: >Volker Quetschke wrote: >> OK, here is the full version: >> >> >> It contains the usual cygcheck and ps output plus: >> >> strace.log_while - the strace file until i

Re: Hang with 20051018 (3rd version) snapshot while building OOo

Volker Quetschke wrote: > OK, here is the full version: > > > It contains the usual cygcheck and ps output plus: > > strace.log_while - the strace file until it hangs > strace.log- the complete strace including the previou

Re: Hang with 20051018 (3rd version) snapshot while building OOo

Volker Quetschke wrote: >> Are you sure that attaching to the process with strace isn't what >> actually >> what caused the process to start up? I don't see any 1 minute delays in >> the strace log. > > We got a strace file that includes the gap. See: > an

Re: Hang with 20051018 (3rd version) snapshot while building OOo

Hi! Are you sure that attaching to the process with strace isn't what actually what caused the process to start up? I don't see any 1 minute delays in the strace log. We got a strace file that includes the gap. See: and search for: 110111469 110230380

Re: Hang with 20051018 (3rd version) snapshot while building OOo

On Thu, Oct 27, 2005 at 01:04:25PM -0400, Volker Quetschke wrote: >(BIG-SNIP) >>>I only paste/attach the 20051024 info, if there is interest I can also send >>>the 20051023 info. >>>(snip) >> >> I would like to see the old strace and any other straces you have to see >> if there's any pattern to s

Re: Hang with 20051018 (3rd version) snapshot while building OOo

(BIG-SNIP) >>I only paste/attach the 20051024 info, if there is interest I can also send >>the 20051023 info. >>(snip) > > I would like to see the old strace and any other straces you have to see > if there's any pattern to something I'm noticing. I got a few more, but before spamming this list wi

Re: Hang with 20051018 (3rd version) snapshot while building OOo

On Tue, Oct 25, 2005 at 12:07:21PM -0400, Volker Quetschke wrote: >Christopher Faylor wrote: >>>Volker Quetschke wrote: Christopher Faylor wrote: >On Wed, Oct 19, 2005 at 03:45:30PM -0400, Volker Quetschke wrote: >(snip) >Given the number of changes that have been made to cygwin, pa

Re: Hang with 20051018 (3rd version) snapshot while building OOo

On Thu, Oct 20, 2005 at 08:48:05AM -0400, Volker Quetschke wrote: >Volker Quetschke wrote: >>Christopher Faylor wrote: >>>On Wed, Oct 19, 2005 at 03:45:30PM -0400, Volker Quetschke wrote: >>>(snip) >>>Given the number of changes that have been made to cygwin, particularly >>>in /proc handling, it's

Re: Hang with 20051018 (3rd version) snapshot while building OOo

On Thu, Oct 20, 2005 at 08:48:05AM -0400, Volker Quetschke wrote: >Volker Quetschke wrote: >>Christopher Faylor wrote: >>>On Wed, Oct 19, 2005 at 03:45:30PM -0400, Volker Quetschke wrote: >>>(snip) >>>Given the number of changes that have been made to cygwin, particularly >>>in /proc handling, it's

Re: Hang with 20051018 (3rd version) snapshot while building OOo

Volker Quetschke wrote: Christopher Faylor wrote: On Wed, Oct 19, 2005 at 03:45:30PM -0400, Volker Quetschke wrote: (snip) Given the number of changes that have been made to cygwin, particularly in /proc handling, it's very difficult for me to believe that you are not seeing *any* differences in

Re: Hang with 20051018 (3rd version) snapshot while building OOo

Volker Quetschke wrote: > Having said that, I never realized that before, maybe the problem really > lies in this special command. I mean due to some historic quirks every > makefile in the OOo tree has a line that sets a macro to the current path > using that command, but there are still lots of o

Re: Hang with 20051018 (3rd version) snapshot while building OOo

Christopher Faylor wrote: > On Wed, Oct 19, 2005 at 03:45:30PM -0400, Volker Quetschke wrote: > (snip) >>Basically we still see the same problem as in >>. >> >>The build hangs in a tcsh like this: >>(snip) >>And by attaching strace to the hung pid

Re: Hang with 20051018 (3rd version) snapshot while building OOo

On Wed, Oct 19, 2005 at 03:45:30PM -0400, Volker Quetschke wrote: >Testing my favorite testcase takes a while, especially if I'm still >not able to reproduce on one of my systems. This is for the third >version of yesterdays snapshot (20051018) . > >Basically we still see the same problem as in > <