Andrey Repin yandex.ru> writes:
>> I don't like using the back ticks myself because of its atrocious
>> readability, but I'm not religious about it.
>
> Then don't use them. Use "$( )" instead. Aside readability issues,
> it also solve nesting and quoting problems.
So much better...thanks, Andre
Greetings, Paul!
> I don't like using the back ticks myself because of its atrocious
> readability, but I'm not religious about it.
Then don't use them. Use "$( )" instead. Aside readability issues, it also
solve nesting and quoting problems.
--
WBR,
Andrey Repin (anrdae...@yandex.ru) 08.01.201
Bob McGowan symantec.com> writes:
| Back to Paul's problem, getting a list of the actual filenames, as
| they actually exist in the filesystem, can be handled by 'find', I
| think. At least it worked in my simple test setup, above.
|
| $ find . -name abc
| ./abc
| $ find . -name 'abc*'
| ./abc
|
On 1/7/15, 8:07 AM, "Paul" wrote:
>Buchbinder, Barry (NIH/NIAID) [E] niaid.nih.gov> writes:
>>Paul sent the following at Tuesday, January 06, 2015 7:12 PM
>>> I'm wading through many files in two file trees. In particular, I'm
>>> looking at corresponding directories in the two trees where "diff
Buchbinder, Barry (NIH/NIAID) [E] niaid.nih.gov> writes:
>Paul sent the following at Tuesday, January 06, 2015 7:12 PM
>> I'm wading through many files in two file trees. In particular, I'm
>> looking at corresponding directories in the two trees where "diff
>> -qr" revealed differences. I want th
Andrey Repin yandex.ru> writes:
>> I'm wading through many files in two file trees. In particular,
>> I'm looking at corresponding directories in the two trees where
>> "diff -qr" revealed differences. I want the absolute truth of what
>> the filename is with minimal distrations about how to ach
> From: Tom Robinson
>
> If you don't want to specify the extension, can you specify as asterisk?
>
> [3236 CBGSAS04:~/Documents]$ touch name.exe
>
> [3237 CBGSAS04:~/Documents]$ ls -l name
> -rw-r--r--+ 1 cbg.tom Domain Users 0 Jan 7 09:34 name
>
> [3238 CBGSAS04:~/Documents]$ ls -l name.exe
Paul sent the following at Tuesday, January 06, 2015 7:12 PM
>I'm wading through many files in two file trees. In particular, I'm
>looking at corresponding directories in the two trees where "diff -qr"
>revealed differences. I want the absolute truth of what the filename is
>with minimal distractio
Greetings, Paul!
>>> ...if I have ~/bin/pdfcrop.exe, the command "ls ~/bin/pdfcrop"
>>> shows pdfcrop rather than pdfcrop.exe. Is there any way to force
>>> ls to show the full filename (including extension) if it matched
>>> the ls argument, even if the ls argument doesn't specify the
>>> extens
Andrey Repin yandex.ru> writes:
>> ...if I have ~/bin/pdfcrop.exe, the command "ls ~/bin/pdfcrop"
>> shows pdfcrop rather than pdfcrop.exe. Is there any way to force
>> ls to show the full filename (including extension) if it matched
>> the ls argument, even if the ls argument doesn't specify the
Greetings, Paul!
> Right now, if I have ~/bin/pdfcrop.exe, the command "ls ~/bin/pdfcrop"
> shows pdfcrop rather than pdfcrop.exe. Is there any way to force ls
> to show the full filename (including extension) if it matched the ls
> argument, even if the ls argument doesn't specify the extension?
On 01/06/2015 02:28 PM, Paul wrote:
> Paul gmail.com> writes:
>> Both solutions are great. I'll set the --append-exe in my bash
>> aliases, and for systems outside of my normal working environment
>> (e.g., working with someone on their unix sessions), I know I can
>> force display of .exe using
Paul gmail.com> writes:
> Both solutions are great. I'll set the --append-exe in my bash
> aliases, and for systems outside of my normal working environment
> (e.g., working with someone on their unix sessions), I know I can
> force display of .exe using asterisk.
Drat. If I pipe files to 'xargs
Tom Robinson gmail.com> writes:
>If you don't want to specify the extension, can you specify as
>asterisk?
>
>[3236 CBGSAS04:~/Documents]$ touch name.exe
>
>[3237 CBGSAS04:~/Documents]$ ls -l name
>-rw-r--r--+ 1 cbg.tom Domain Users 0 Jan 7 09:34 name
>
>[3238 CBGSAS04:~/Documents]$ ls -l name.ex
On 2015-01-06 13:34, Paul wrote:
Right now, if I have ~/bin/pdfcrop.exe, the command "ls ~/bin/pdfcrop"
shows pdfcrop rather than pdfcrop.exe. Is there any way to force ls
to show the full filename (including extension) if it matched the ls
argument, even if the ls argument doesn't specify the e
If you don't want to specify the extension, can you specify as asterisk?
[3236 CBGSAS04:~/Documents]$ touch name.exe
[3237 CBGSAS04:~/Documents]$ ls -l name
-rw-r--r--+ 1 cbg.tom Domain Users 0 Jan 7 09:34 name
[3238 CBGSAS04:~/Documents]$ ls -l name.exe
-rw-r--r--+ 1 cbg.tom Domain Users 0 Jan
Right now, if I have ~/bin/pdfcrop.exe, the command "ls ~/bin/pdfcrop"
shows pdfcrop rather than pdfcrop.exe. Is there any way to force ls
to show the full filename (including extension) if it matched the ls
argument, even if the ls argument doesn't specify the extension? I
read http://cygwin.com
17 matches
Mail list logo
