On Mon, 21 Jul 2003, Henry Da Costa wrote:
> Larry Hall wrote:
> > Why do you only have the executable? Also, why can't the provider of
> > this executable give you with the support you need? Strictly
> > speaking, if the provider hasn't purchased a commercial license from
> > Red Hat, they are
On Mon, 21 Jul 2003, Max Bowsher wrote:
> Henry Da Costa wrote:
> > Hello Mr. Faylor,
>
> You have sent this message to a public mailing list.
>
> > I hope you can help me. I'm looking for a complete Cygwin version 1.3.20
> > set of packages but have so far bee
Larry Hall wrote:
> Why do you only have the executable? Also, why can't the provider of
> this executable give you with the support you need? Strictly
> speaking, if the provider hasn't purchased a commercial license from
> Red Hat, they are legally bound by the GPL. If they aren't providing
>
Henry Da Costa wrote:
Elfyn McBratney wrote:
I will add this though: If you have a program that worked on 1.3.20*
which does
not work on 1.3.22* it's more productive to try and find out the cause
of the
problem rather than going back in time. If it turns out to be a
problem in the
Cygwin DLL, m
Elfyn McBratney wrote:
> I will add this though: If you have a program that worked on 1.3.20*
which does
> not work on 1.3.22* it's more productive to try and find out the cause
of the
> problem rather than going back in time. If it turns out to be a
problem in the
> Cygwin DLL, matbe the royal we
should have
> been more vigilant.
Perhaps reading that pege in it's entirity (I mean the bottom of) would have
helped.
> > The phrase "complete Cygwin version 1.3.20 set of packages" is
> meaningless.
> > A Cygwin DLL version number does not uniquely identify a set of
Max Bowsher wrote:
> You have sent this message to a public mailing list.
Thanks for replying. I didn't realize that the "Christopher Faylor" link
at http://www.cygwin.com/ led to the cygwin mailing list. I should have
been more vigilant.
> The phrase "complete Cy
Henry Da Costa wrote:
> Hello Mr. Faylor,
You have sent this message to a public mailing list.
> I hope you can help me. I'm looking for a complete Cygwin version 1.3.20
> set of packages but have so far been unable to find it.
The phrase "complete Cygwin version 1.3.20
Hello Mr. Faylor,
I hope you can help me. I'm looking for a complete Cygwin version 1.3.20
set of packages but have so far been unable to find it. I need that
particular version of Cygwin because other versions including the latest
one give us an error when used from a development tool for
9 matches
Mail list logo
