On 2019-09-13 16:14, Kaz Kylheku wrote:
> On 2019-09-13 12:11, Wayne Davison wrote:
>> On Fri, Sep 13, 2019 at 4:27 AM wrote:
>>> In Linux [times()] returns a time value and return code of 0:
>>
>> The Linux man page for times() mentions this special behavior, how it
>> isn't portable, and even adv
tl...@twcny.rr.com writes:
> The code below returns -1. It shouldn't.
This is hopefully fixed in the 3.1.0-05 test release of Cygwin.
Regards,
Achim.
--
+<[Q+ Matrix-12 WAVE#46+305 Neuron microQkb Andromeda XTk Blofeld]>+
SD adaptations for Waldorf Q V3.00R3 and Q+ V3.54R2:
http://Synth.Strome
On 2019-09-13 12:11, Wayne Davison wrote:
On Fri, Sep 13, 2019 at 4:27 AM wrote:
In Linux [times()] returns a time value and return code of 0:
The Linux man page for times() mentions this special behavior, how it
isn't portable, and even advises against using the function:
"On Linux, the buf
On Fri, Sep 13, 2019 at 4:27 AM wrote:
> In Linux [times()] returns a time value and return code of 0:
The Linux man page for times() mentions this special behavior, how it
isn't portable, and even advises against using the function:
"On Linux, the buf argument can be specified as NULL, with the
: cygwin@cygwin.com
Subject: Re: Bug in TIME function
On 2019-09-12 12:05, tl...@twcny.rr.com wrote:
> The code below returns -1. It shouldn't.
> #include
> #include
> int main(int argc, char *argv[])
> {
> printf("return value %ld\n", (long)times((struct tms*)
On 2019-09-12 11:16, Kaz Kylheku wrote:
So even in light of the goal of Cygwin providing GNU/Linux
compatibility
beyond POSIX, there is no justification for supporting times(0).
What I wrote here is not true; on Linux, this is a system call, which
provides detection of some kinds of bad pointe
On 2019-09-12 12:05, tl...@twcny.rr.com wrote:
> The code below returns -1. It shouldn't.
> #include
> #include
> int main(int argc, char *argv[])
> {
> printf("return value %ld\n", (long)times((struct tms*)0));
> return 0;
> }
It should.
The times(3) function requires a pointer to object st
On 2019-09-12 11:05, tl...@twcny.rr.com wrote:
The code below returns -1. It shouldn't.
Says who?
I don't see anything in the specification which says that a null pointer
argument is allowed:
https://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/9699919799/functions/times.html
Passing a null pointer to an
The code below returns -1. It shouldn't.
#include
#include
int main(int argc, char *argv[])
{
printf("return value %ld\n", (long)times((struct tms*)0));
return 0;
}
--
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
Docume
9 matches
Mail list logo
