On 2019-09-12 11:16, Kaz Kylheku wrote:
So even in light of the goal of Cygwin providing GNU/Linux
compatibility
beyond POSIX, there is no justification for supporting times(0).
What I wrote here is not true; on Linux, this is a system call, which
provides detection of some kinds of bad pointers, turning them into
-1/EFAULT.
--
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
